Category: Taxation

Stay updated on taxation news, tax laws, FBR policies, compliance, audits, income tax, sales tax, and fiscal developments in Pakistan.

  • Sindh Revenue Board suspends sales tax registration of 18 construction companies

    Sindh Revenue Board suspends sales tax registration of 18 construction companies

    KARACHI: Sindh Revenue Board (SRB) has suspended registration of 18 construction companies for defaulting tax payments and failure to file monthly sales tax returns.

    The SRB has directed the companies to make compliance with the provincial tax laws by March 12, 2020 otherwise their cases would be proceeded for cancellation.

    Following companies have been suspended for non-compliance:

    01. M/S CATALYST ENGINEERING SERVICES

    02. M/S START CONSTRUNCTION COMPANY

    03. M/S. A.H BUILDERS & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

    04. M/S. ROCCRETE CONSTRUCTION & CO

    05. M/S. GUL MEMON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR)

    06. M/S. JD BUILDERS

    07. M/S ABDULLAH RAHOO & COMPANY

    08. M/S MUHAMMAD AYOOB ENTERPRISES

    09. M/S MALIK NAVEED CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

    10. M/S SHOUKAT ALI & COMPANY

    11. M/S MUMTAZ ALI KHUSKH (GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR)

    12. M/S JUMAN S/O ALLAH BACHAIO SHEEDI

    13. M/S RAMEEZ RAJA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

    14. M/S A.KAREEM & SONS

    15. M/S MALIK MUHAMMAD SAEED GOVT & CIVIL CONTRACTOR

    16. M/S REMIX CONSTRUCTION

    17. M/S BISMILL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTING COMPANY

    18. M/S MEHRAJ COMPANY

    During suspension period the companies are unable to deal with registered persons and also not able to get government contracts.

  • Tax collection from profit on banking deposits jumps up by 185%

    Tax collection from profit on banking deposits jumps up by 185%

    KARACHI: The collection of withholding tax from profit on banking deposits surged by 185 percent during first eight months (July – February) 2019/2020 owing to higher interest rates maintained by the central bank.

    The withholding tax collection from profit on debt (banking deposits) increased to Rs43.75 billion during first eight months of current fiscal year as compared with Rs15.32 billion in the same period of the last fiscal year.

    The sources in Regional Tax Office (RTO)-II, Karachi, a revenue collecting arm of the FBR said that that due to prevailing high rate ofinterest attracted bank deposits.

    The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) has keptpolicy rate unchanged at 13.25 percent. The policy rate was gradually increasing since August 2018 when the rate was 7.5 percent.

    The sources explained that under Section 151(1)(b) withholding tax is collected on profit on debt paid by banking companies or financial institutions on account or deposit maintained.

    Every banking company is required to collect 10 percent of the gross yield/profit paid up to Rs500,000 or 15 percent of the gross yield / profit paid exceeding amount Rs500,000 at the time the profit on debt is credited to the account of the recipient or is actually paid, whichever is earlier.

    The sources said that it is mandatory for the banks to collect double the amount of withholding tax from those persons receiving profit on debt but not on the Active Taxpayers List (ATL).

    The government through Finance Act, 2019 introduced 10th Schedule to the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 to enhance the rate of withholding tax by 100 percent on certain transactions.

    The measure has been taken to force persons making large transactions and paying withholding tax on such transactions but remained outside the tax net.

    The sources said that after the implementation of the 10th Schedule the pace of return filing for Tax Year 2018 increased in order to avoid paying 100 percent higher rate of withholding tax.

  • FBR allows tier-1 retailers to integrate POSs by March 30

    FBR allows tier-1 retailers to integrate POSs by March 30

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has allowed big retailers to integrate their point of sale (POS) with FBR’s online system by March 31, 2020 in order to avoid legal action.

    The FBR on Monday extended the date of online integration of Tier-1 retailers.

    The FBR said that it had condoned the time limit as provided in Sales Tax Rules, 2006 up to March 31, 2020, for online integration of tier-1 retailers’ POSs with board’s computerized system for real-time reporting of sales.

    However, this permission is subject to condition that the teir-1 retailers should furnish in writing their willingness to integrated all their POSs in terms of the rules to respective Regional Tax Offices (RTOs)/Large Taxpayers Units (LTUs) by March 15, 2020.

    Previously, the deadline was expired on December 15, 2019 which was given by the FBR to tier-1 retailers to integrate their POSs with the FBR online system.

    All tier-1 retailers are required to integrate all their POSs with FBR’s computerized system.

    Tier-1 retailer is defined in section 2(43A) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, to be a person who falls in any of the following categories:

    (a) a retailer operating as a unit of a national or international chain of stores;

    (b) a retailer operating in an air-conditioned shopping mall, plaza or centre, excluding kiosks;

    (c) a retailer whose cumulative electricity bill during the immediately preceding twelve consecutive months exceeds Rupees twelve hundred thousand;

    (d) a wholesaler-cum-retailer, engaged in bulk import and supply of consumer goods on wholesale basis to the retailers as well as on retail basis to the general body of the consumers”; and

    (e) a retailer, whose shop measures one thousand square feet in area or more.

  • Tax collection from property purchase falls amid FBR action against black money

    Tax collection from property purchase falls amid FBR action against black money

    KARACHI: The collection of withholding tax on purchase of immovable properties fell by 12 percent owing to fall in prices after slowdown in economy and enforcement of legal provisions by Federal Board of Revenue (FBR).

    Sources in local tax office in Karachi said that the collection of the tax office fell to Rs390 million during first eight months (July-February) of current fiscal year as compared with Rs443 million in the same period of the last fiscal year.

    The sources said that slowdown in economy had restrained people from purchasing or transfer immovable properties. Further the enforcing legal provision related to curb black money also prevented investment in the real estate business, they added.

    The sources said besides these issues the ongoing hearing related to illegal constructions in Karachi city at the level of Supreme Court of Pakistan also impacted the purchase of immovable properties.

    They said that the decline in collection of withholding income tax was also due to deteriorating in open market prices due to fear of action against black money.

    It is reported that the real estate business in Pakistan is one of the biggest avenue for the black money.

    The withholding tax on purchase of immovable property is one percent of the declared value on the basis of FBR valuation table. However, the tax rate is two percent if the buyer is not on the active taxpayers list (ATL).

    However, changes in the law enable the tax authorities to examine the declared value by a purchaser and on non-satisfaction the tax authorities may assess the property on fair market value.

    The sources said that the real estate business was also afraid as tax authorities had started obtaining information from bank regarding payment for the purchase of immovable properties.

    Besides, the tax authorities are also obtaining information of buyers of immovable properties from provincial property registrars on real-time basis.

    The sources said that the tax machinery was finalized strategy to take harsh action against black money invested in real estate business in the wake of significant shortfall in revenue collection.

  • All members of AOP responsible to pay tax default

    All members of AOP responsible to pay tax default

    KARACHI: Any tax payable by an Association of Persons (AOP) was not recovered in such case every person of the AOP shall be jointly and severally responsible for payment of the tax due.

    Officials of Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) said that through Finance Act, 2019 the amendment made to Section 139 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 to make responsible every person of an AOP for default payment.

    The Section 139 says:

    Section 139: Collection of tax in the case of private companies and associations of persons

    (1) Notwithstanding anything in the Companies Ordinance, 1984 (XLVII of 1984), where any tax payable by a private company (including a private company that has been wound up or gone into liquidation) in respect of any tax year cannot be recovered from the company, every person who was, at any time in that tax year —

    (a) a director of the company, other than an employed director; or

    (b) a shareholder in the company owning not less than ten per cent of the paid-up capital of the company, shall be jointly and severally liable for payment of the tax due by the company.

    (2) Any director who pays tax under sub-section (1) shall be entitled to recover the tax paid from the company or a share of the tax from any other director.

    (3) A shareholder who pays tax under sub-section (1) shall be entitled to recover the tax paid from the company or from any other shareholder to whom clause (b) of sub-section (1) applies in proportion to the shares owned by that other shareholder.

    (4) Notwithstanding anything in any law, where any tax payable by a member of an association of persons in respect of the member’s share of the income of the association in respect of any tax year cannot be recovered from the member, the association shall be liable for the tax due by the member.

    (5) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law, for the time being in force, where any tax payable by an association of persons in respect of any tax year cannot be recovered from the association of persons, every person who was, at any time in that year, a member of the association of persons, shall be jointly and severally liable for payment of the tax due by the association of persons.

    (6) Any member who pays tax under sub-section (5) shall be entitled to recover the tax paid from the association of persons or a share of the tax from any other member.

    (7) The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to any amount due under this section as if it were tax due under an assessment order.

  • Immovable property purchase made mandatory through banking channel

    Immovable property purchase made mandatory through banking channel

    KARACHI: Tax authorities have said that payment for purchase of immovable properties above Rs5 million is mandatory to be paid through banking channel. (more…)

  • MCC Hyderabad announces auction of non-duty paid vehicles on March 11

    MCC Hyderabad announces auction of non-duty paid vehicles on March 11

    KARACHI: Model Customs Collectorate (MCC) Hyderabad announced auction of non-duty paid motor vehicles to be held on March 11, 2020.

    Following vehicles will be offered for auction:

    1. Foreign Origin Non-duty paid vehicle Toyota Hilux Surf Jeep, bearing Reg. No. LEB-13-9976, Chassis No VZN185-9025060, HP-2928 Cc and Model-1999 as per registration documents.

    2. F/o NDP Vehicle Toyota Land Cruiser, Reg. No JAC-538, Chassis No. KZJ171-0003200, HP-3000 Cc and Model-1994.

    3. F/o NDP Vehicle Crown Saloon Car, Reg. No IDH-4761, Chassis No. JZS171-0047197, HP-2491 Cc and Model-2000.

    4. F/o NDP Vehicle Premio Car, Reg. No ALP-100, Chassis No. NZT240-0049126, HP-1496 Cc and Model-2003.

    5. F/o NDP Vehicle Suzuki Swift Car, Reg. No AJK-763, Chassis No. ZC11S-400757, HP-1500 Cc and Model-2007.

    6. F/o NDP Vehicle Toyota Surf Jeep, Reg. No JAG-011, Chassis No. RZN185-9032054, HP-2700 Cc and Model-1996.

    7. F/o NDP Vehicle Hyundai Santafe, Reg. No CC-6931, Chassis No. KMHSH81 WP7U180273, HP-2199 Cc and Model-2007.

    8. F/o NDP Vehicle Toyota X Corolla Car, Reg. No ABB-726, Chassis No. NZE121-3021675, HP-1500 Cc and Model-2000.

    9. F/o NDP Vehicle Mitsubishi Pajero Jeep, Reg. No BC-8608, Chassis No. V45-4503036, HP-3475 Cc and Model-1998.

    10. F/o NDP Vehicle Toyota Premio Car, Reg. No ALV-497, Chassis No. ZZT240-5002997, HP-1794 Cc and Model-2003.

    11. F/o NDP Vehicle Passo Car, Reg. No AXM-699, Chassis No. KGC10-0018901, HP-990 Cc and Model-2004.

    12. F/o NDP Vehicle Passo Car, Reg. No AQY-343, Chassis No. KGC10-00206481, HP-990 Cc and Model-2004.

    13. F/o NDP Vehicle Passo Car, Reg. No AWD-086, Chassis No. KGC10-0016090, HP-990 Cc and Model-2004.

    14. F/o NDP Vehicle Passo Car, Reg. No AXP-145, Chassis No. KGC10-0088259, HP-990 Cc and Model-2006.

    15. F/o NDP Vehicle Toyota Camery Car, Reg. No AJR-272, Chassis No. JTDBE38K70-3011979, HP-2400 Cc and Model-2005.

    16. F/o NDP Vehicle Toyota Surf Jeep, Reg. No BF-2555, Chassis No. RZN185-9020573, HP-2700 Cc and Model-1998.

    17. F/o NDP Vehicle Toyota Grand E Mark II Car, Reg. No AFD-292, Chassis No. JZX110-6250280, HP-2500 Cc and Model-2003.

    18. F/o NDP Vehicle Toyota VITZ Car, Reg. No AJV-132, Chassis No. SCP10-3056334, HP-1000 Cc and Model-1999.

  • High valued building at PECHS detected as benami; FBR attaches, initiates proceedings

    High valued building at PECHS detected as benami; FBR attaches, initiates proceedings

    KARACHI: Anti-Benami Initiative Zone-III Karachi of Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has detected residential cum commercial high valued building as benami property, which is located in posh area of the city.

    According to details, the anti-benami zone investigated the source of income for the purchase of the property and discovered that the owners or benamidars were never in financial position to purchase the said immovable properties.

    The sources said that the zone provisionally attached the property and launched investigation to dig out the beneficial owners.

    The zone while exercising powers under Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 2017 issued notices to the benamidars of plot Nos. 167C and 168C Commercial Area, Block 2 PECHS after having sufficient reasons to believe that the land was benami.

    The notices were sent to Muhamma Yaseen benamidar of plot no. 167C and Kashif Hasan benamidar of plot no. 168C to provide all relevant documents for the purchase of property and source of income besides producing record of submitted annual income tax returns.

    Meanwhile, during the provisional attachment the benamidars and others have been prohibited and restrained from transferring of immovable properties or subjecting the same to a charge in any manner and that all persons have been prohibited from taking any benefit under such transfer or charge.

    The sources said that the one building was constructed by joining both the plots. Therefore, it was believed that there would be one beneficial persons in both the plots.

  • FBR may invoke provisions for third party recovery

    FBR may invoke provisions for third party recovery

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) may invoke provisions related to third party recovery of tax defaulted by a taxpayer.

    FBR sources said that the tax authorities may invoke Section 140 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 in order to make recovery from a defaulter.

    The FBR recently notified draft rules through SRO 111(I)/2020 dated February 14, 2020 to implement Section 140 of the Ordinance.

    As per the draft rules the tax authorities would be empowered to recover tax from a defaulter through third party, who owes money to the defaulted taxpayer.

    The sources said that the FBR soon issue the notification to make draft rules to part of the statute.

    The FBR is facing huge revenue shortfall for achieving this revenue collection target. Therefore, the tax machinery may apply all possible ways to recovery outstanding amount.

    The Section 140 explains the procedure of recovery through third party.

    Section 140: Recovery of tax from persons holding money on behalf of a taxpayer

    Sub-Section (1): For the purpose of recovering any tax due by a taxpayer, the Commissioner may, by notice, in writing, require any person –

    (a) owing or who may owe money to the taxpayer; or

    (b) holding or who may hold money for, or on account of the taxpayer;

    (c) holding or who may hold money on account of some other person for payment to the taxpayer; or

    (d) having authority of some other person to pay money to the taxpayer, to pay to the Commissioner so much of the money as set out in the notice by the date set out in the notice:

    “Provided that the Commissioner shall not issue notice under this sub-section for recovery of any tax due from a taxpayer if the said taxpayer has filed an appeal under section 127 in respect of the order under which the tax sought to be recovered has become payable and the appeal has not been decided by the Commissioner (Appeals), subject to the condition that ten per cent of the said amount of tax due has been paid by the taxpayer.”

    Sub-Section (2): Subject to sub-section (3), the amount set out in a notice under sub-section (1) —

    (a) where the amount of the money is equal to or less than the amount of tax due by the taxpayer, shall not exceed the amount of the money; or

    (b) in any other case, shall be so much of the money as is sufficient to pay the amount of tax due by the taxpayer.

    Sub-Section (3): Where a person is liable to make a series of payments (such as salary) to a taxpayer, a notice under sub-section (1) may specify an amount to be paid out of each payment until the amount of tax due by the taxpayer has been paid.

    Sub-Section (4): The date for payment specified in a notice under sub-section (1) shall not be a date before the money becomes payable to the taxpayer or held on the taxpayer’s behalf.

    Sub-Section (5): The provisions of sections 160, 161, 162 and 163, so far as may be, shall apply to an amount due under this section as if the amount were required to be deducted from a payment under Division III of Part V of this Chapter.

    Sub-Section (6): Any person who has paid any amount in compliance with a notice under sub-section (1) shall be treated as having paid such amount under the authority of the taxpayer and the receipt of the Commissioner constitutes a good and sufficient discharge of the liability of such person to the taxpayer to the extent of the amount referred to in such receipt.

    Sub-Section (10): In this section, “person” includes any Court, Tribunal or any other authority.

  • Sindh collects Rs4.77 billion as motor vehicle tax

    Sindh collects Rs4.77 billion as motor vehicle tax

    KARACHI: The Sindh government has collected Rs4.77 billion as motor vehicle tax during first eight months (July – February) 2019/2020.

    This was informed at a meeting presided over by Provincial Minister for Excise and Taxation – Narcotics Control and Parliamentary Affairs Mukesh Kumar Chawla on Friday.

    At the meeting the provincial minister directed the officers to ensure timely and complete recovery of taxes and especially to speed up the collection of property tax and motor vehicle tax.

    The meeting was also attended by Secretary Excise and Taxation & Narcotics Control Abdul Rahim Sheikh, Director General Shoaib Ahmed Siddiqui and other officers.

    Briefing the meeting, Director General Excise and Taxation & Narcotics Control Shoaib Ahmed Siddiqui said that Rs. 651.480 million was collected in the month of February in term of motor vehicle tax.

    He further stated that Rs. 4036.314 million from Karachi, Rs 340.999 million from Hyderabad and Rs 199.325 million from Sukkur while Rs 74.183 million was received from Shaheed Benazirbad, Rs 75.943 million from Larkana and Rs 43.399 million from Mirpur Khas as motor vehicle tax.

    Addressing the meeting, Provincial Minister Mukesh Kumar Chawla directed the officers to pay special attention to motor vehicle tax collection and a comprehensive road checking campaign should be launched as soon as possible to collect the tax from the tax defaulting vehicles.

    He said that officers who failed to meet the tax targets would be taken to task and no negligence would be tolerated in the collection of taxes.