Section 177 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 empowers tax authorities to examine taxpayers’ records, conduct electronic audits, use sectoral benchmarks and order specialised audits, subject to prescribed conditions.

The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has outlined the income tax audit framework applicable for Tax Year 2027, detailing the powers of tax commissioners to examine taxpayers’ financial records, determine taxable income and order specialised audits under Section 177 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.

READ MORE: FBR issues procedure for sales tax payment in instalment on imported mobile phones

The FBR issued the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, updated up to June 30, 2026, for Tax Year 2027, covering the period from July 1, 2026, to June 30, 2027.

Under Section 177, the Commissioner Inland Revenue may require taxpayers to produce records and documents, including books of accounts maintained under the ordinance or any other applicable law, for the purpose of auditing their income tax affairs.

Where records are maintained electronically, taxpayers must provide access to the relevant systems and software, enabling the commissioner or an authorised officer to examine the information. Tax authorities may also obtain duly attested hard copies of electronic records for investigations and proceedings under the ordinance.

However, the commissioner must record written reasons before requesting a taxpayer’s records and communicate those reasons to the taxpayer when issuing the request. The provision also establishes a six-year limit, stating that records relating to a tax year cannot be requested after six years have expired from the end of that tax year.

Electronic audits and sectoral benchmarks

After obtaining the necessary records, or where the required records have not been maintained, the commissioner may audit a taxpayer’s income tax affairs. The examination can cover accounts, expenditure, assets and liabilities, and authorities may request additional information and documents where considered necessary.

Section 177 also permits audit proceedings to be conducted electronically through video links or other facilities prescribed by the FBR.

The law sets out consequences for taxpayers who fail to maintain or provide adequate documentation. Where a taxpayer does not furnish records, submits incomplete books of accounts or cannot sufficiently explain defects in the documentation, the commissioner may conclude that taxable income has not been correctly declared.

In such circumstances, taxable income is to be determined using sectoral benchmark ratios prescribed by the FBR.

These benchmarks may include financial ratios, production ratios, gross profit ratios, net profit ratios, recovery ratios and wastage ratios. The framework allows the tax authorities to use standard business-sector indicators when the taxpayer’s records are missing, incomplete or inadequately explained.

Audit reports and amended assessments

Following the completion of an audit, the commissioner must obtain the taxpayer’s explanation regarding the issues raised before issuing an audit report containing the observations and findings.

After issuing the report, the commissioner may amend the taxpayer’s assessment under Section 122(1) or Section 122(4), as applicable, provided the taxpayer is given an opportunity to be heard under Section 122(9).

The provisions therefore establish a process for examining discrepancies, considering the taxpayer’s explanation and taking further assessment action where warranted.

Specialised audits and professional valuations

Section 177 allows the commissioner to require additional professional examinations where the nature, complexity or volume of accounts, doubts about their correctness, the multiplicity of transactions or the specialised nature of a business makes such action necessary.

With the previous approval of the Chief Commissioner and after giving the taxpayer a reasonable opportunity to be heard, the commissioner may direct the taxpayer to arrange one or more of the following:

• Re-audit of accounts by an accountant.

• Revaluation of inventory by a cost accountant.

• Determination of actuarial values in the accounts by an actuary.

The relevant professional must provide a signed and verified report, including answers to specific questions raised by the commissioner.

The commissioner nominates the accountant, cost accountant or actuary from a panel nominated by the FBR. Under the stated proviso, a registered person may object to the initial nomination of an accountant or cost accountant within 15 days. If the commissioner accepts the objection, another professional may be nominated.

The law also clarifies that a taxpayer audited in one year may be audited again in subsequent years where reasonable grounds exist.

Chartered accountants and special audit panels

The FBR may appoint firms of chartered accountants or cost and management accountants to audit the income tax affairs of individuals or classes of persons. The scope of each audit is determined by the Board or the commissioner on a case-by-case basis.

Employees of appointed firms may also be authorised in writing to exercise specified powers under Sections 175 and 176 for audit purposes.

Section 177 further empowers the FBR to establish special audit panels comprising two or more members. These may include Inland Revenue officers, chartered accountant firms, cost and management accountant firms, foreign experts, specialists and tax audit experts deployed through international tax organisations or foreign tax authorities.

Where a panel member is not an Inland Revenue officer, the law requires a confidentiality agreement between the FBR and the relevant individual, organisation or tax authority.

Each special audit panel must be headed by an Inland Revenue officer. The powers under Sections 175 and 176 may be exercised for these audits only by Inland Revenue officers serving on the panel and authorised by the commissioner.

The law also provides that an audit may continue if a panel member other than the chairman is absent. Such an absence alone does not invalidate the proceedings. The FBR may prescribe the panels’ constitution, procedures and working arrangements.

Consequences of failing to provide records

Section 177 contains provisions allowing the commissioner to proceed with a best-judgement assessment under Section 121 where a taxpayer fails to produce required accounts, documents, electronic records, machines or other evidence for an audit conducted by the commissioner, an appointed professional firm or a special audit panel.

In such cases, the assessment treated as having been made on the basis of the taxpayer’s filed or revised return is stated to have no legal effect.

The ordinance also clarifies that the commissioner’s powers under Section 177 operate independently of the FBR’s powers under Section 214C. The latter does not restrict the commissioner’s authority to request records or conduct an audit under Section 177.

The provisions collectively establish the legal framework for income tax audits during Tax Year 2027, covering documentation requirements, electronic examinations, sectoral income benchmarks, professional re-audits, special audit panels and the consequences of non-compliance.

Taxpayers should ensure that their accounting records are complete, accessible and properly maintained, while responding to audit requests and explaining discrepancies in accordance with the applicable legal requirements.

READ MORE: FBR empowered to enter premises without prior notice in Tax Year 2027