Tag: Income Tax Ordinance 2001

Section 225 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 grants the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) the authority to continue or initiate proceedings against companies undergoing liquidation without the need for leave from the Court.

(more…)

Section 224 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 explicitly declares that any proceedings before the Commissioner, Commissioner (Appeals), or Appellate Tribunal are to be treated as judicial proceedings.

(more…)

Section 223 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 allowed a taxpayer to nominate a representative for an appearance on his/her behalf before the tax authorities.

The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) issued the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 updated up to June 30, 2021. The Ordinance incorporated amendments brought through Finance Act, 2021.

Following is the text of Section 223 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001:

223. Appearance by authorised representative. — (1) Any taxpayer who is entitled or required to attend before the Commissioner, the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Appellate Tribunal in connection with any proceeding under this Ordinance may, except when required under section 176 to attend personally, attend by an authorised representative.

(2) For the purposes of this section and subject to sub-section (3), an authorised representative of a taxpayer shall be a person who is a representative of the person under section 172 and any of the following persons, namely:–

(a) A relative of the taxpayer;

(b) a current full-time employee of the taxpayer;

(c) any officer of a scheduled bank with which the taxpayer maintains a current account or has other regular dealings;

(d) any legal practitioner entitled to practice in any Civil Court in Pakistan;

(e) any accountant; or

(f) any income tax practitioner.

(3) For the purposes of this section —

(a) no person who has been dismissed or removed from service in the Income Tax Department shall be entitled to represent a taxpayer under sub-section (1);

(b) no person having resigned from service after having been employed in the Income Tax Department for not less than two years shall be entitled to represent a taxpayer under sub-section (1) for a period of two years from the date of resignation;

(c) no person having retired from service in the Income Tax Department shall be entitled to represent a taxpayer under sub-

section (1) for a period of one year from the date of retirement in any case in which the person had made or approved, as the case may be, any order of assessment, refund or appeal within one year before the date of retirement; or

(d) no person who has become insolvent shall be entitled to represent a taxpayer under sub-section (1) for so long as the insolvency continues;

(e) no person who has been convicted of an offence in relation to any income tax proceedings under this Ordinance shall be entitled to represent a taxpayer under sub-section (1) for such period as the Commissioner may, by order in writing, determine.

(4) Where any legal practitioner or accountant is found guilty of misconduct in a professional capacity by any authority entitled to take disciplinary action against the legal practitioner or accountant, an order passed by that authority shall have effect in relation to any right to represent a taxpayer under sub-section (1) as it has in relation to the person’s right to practice as a legal practitioner or accountant.

(5) Where any person (other than a person to whom sub-section (4) applies) is found guilty of misconduct in relation to any income tax proceeding, the Commissioner may, by an order in writing, direct that the person cease to represent a taxpayer under sub-section (1) before the Commissioner, Commissioner (Appeals) or Appellate Tribunal.

(6) The Commissioner shall not make an order under clause (e) of sub-section (3) or sub-section (5) in respect of any person, unless the Commissioner has given the person a reasonable opportunity to be heard.

(7) Any person against whom an order under clause (e) of sub-section (3) or sub-section (5) has been made may, within thirty days of service of notice of the order, appeal to the Board to have the order cancelled.

(8) The Board may admit an appeal after the expiration of the period specified in sub-section (7) if satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from lodging the appeal within the period.

(9) No order made under clause (e) of sub-section (3) or sub-section (5) shall take effect until thirty days after notice of the order is served on the person or, where an appeal has been lodged under sub-section (7), until the disposal of the appeal.

(10) The Board may make rules under section 237 for the registration of income tax practitioners and related matters, including establishing a code of conduct for such practitioners.

(11) In this section –

“accountant” means –

(a) a chartered accountant within the meaning of the Chartered Accountants Ordinance, 1961 (X of 1961);

(b) a cost and management accountant within the meaning of the Cost and Management Accountants Act, 1966 (XIV of 1966); or

(c) a member of any association of accountants recognised for the purposes of this section by the Board; and

“income tax practitioner” means a person who is registered as such by the Board, being a person who possesses such qualifications as may be prescribed for the purposes of this section or who has retired after putting in satisfactory service in the Income Tax Department for a period of not less than ten years in a post or posts not below that of Income Tax Officer.

(Disclaimer: The text of the above section is only for information. Team PkRevenue.com makes all efforts to provide the correct version of the text. However, the team PkRevenue.com is not responsible for any error or omission.)

Commissioner may appoint expert for audit, valuation

Section 222 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 empowered a commissioner of Inland Revenue to appoint an expert for the purpose of audit or valuation.

The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) issued the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 updated up to June 30, 2021. The Ordinance incorporated amendments brought through Finance Act, 2021.

Following is the text of Section 222 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001:

222. Appointment of expert. — The Commissioner may appoint any expert as the Commissioner considers necessary for the purposes of this Ordinance, including for the purposes of audit or valuation.

222A. Fee and service charges.- (1) The Board with the approval of Federal Minister-in-charge may, be notification in the official Gazette, and subject to such conditions, limitations or restrictions as it may deem fit to impose, levy fee and services charges for valuation or in respect of any other service or control mechanism provided by any formation under the control of the Board, including ventures of public-private partnership at such rates as may be specified in the notification.

(2) The Board may authorize and prescribe the manner in which fee and service charges collected including by ventures of public-private partnership under this section are expended.

(Disclaimer: The text of the above section is only for information. Team PkRevenue.com makes all efforts to provide the correct version of the text. However, the team PkRevenue.com is not responsible for any error or omission.)

Commissioner can rectify mistakes apparent from record

Section 221 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 describes that the commissioner can rectify any mistakes apparent from the record.

The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) issued the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 updated up to June 30, 2021. The Ordinance incorporated amendments brought through Finance Act, 2021.

Following is the text of Section 221 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001:

221. Rectification of mistakes.— (1) The Commissioner, the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Appellate Tribunal may, by an order in writing, amend any order passed by him to rectify any mistake apparent from the record on his or its own motion or any mistake brought to his or its notice by a taxpayer or, in the case of the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Appellate Tribunal, the Commissioner.

(1A) The Commissioner may, by an order in writing, amend any order passed under the repealed Ordinance by the Deputy Commissioner, or an Income Tax Panel, as defined in section 2 of the repealed Ordinance to rectify any mistake apparent from the record on his own motion or any mistake brought to his notice by a taxpayer and the provisions of sub-section (2), sub-section (3) and sub-section (4) shall apply in like manner as these apply to an order under sub-section (1).

(2) No order under sub-section (1) which has the effect of increasing an assessment, reducing a refund or otherwise applying adversely to the taxpayer shall be made unless the taxpayer has been given a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

(3) Where a mistake apparent on the record is brought to the notice of the Commissioner or Commissioner (Appeals), as the case may be, and no order has been made under sub-section (1) before the expiration of the financial year next following the date on which the mistake was brought to their notice, the mistake shall be treated as rectified and all the provisions of this Ordinance shall have effect accordingly.

(4) No order under sub-section (1) may be made after five years from the date of the order sought to be rectified.

(Disclaimer: The text of the above section is only for information. Team PkRevenue.com makes all efforts to provide the correct version of the text. However, the team PkRevenue.com is not responsible for any error or omission.)

Receipts for amounts paid under section 220

Section 220 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, explicitly states that the Commissioner is obligated to provide a receipt for any tax or amount paid under this ordinance.

(more…)

Section 219 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 now dictates that the amount of tax or refund should be computed to the nearest rupee, with fractions less than fifty paisa disregarded and those equal to or exceeding fifty paisa treated as one rupee.

(more…)

Section 218 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 describes service of notices and other documents. The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) issued the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 updated up to June 30, 2021.

(more…)

The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has detailed the authentication procedures for forms, notices, and other documents as per Section 217 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.

(more…)

Section 216A of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 describes the proceedings against authority and persons.

The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) issued the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 updated up to June 30, 2021. The Ordinance incorporated amendments brought through Finance Act, 2021.

Following is the text of Section 216A of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001:

216A. Proceeding against authority and persons.- (1) Subject to section 227, the Board shall prescribe rules for initiating criminal proceedings against any authority mentioned in section 207 and officer of the Directorate General mentioned in Part II and Part III of Chapter XI including any person subordinate to the aforesaid authorities or officers of the Directorates General who wilfully and deliberately commits or omits an act which results in under benefit or advantage to the authority or the officer or official or to any other person.

(2) Where proceedings under sub-section (1) have been initiated against the authority or officer or official, the Board shall simultaneously intimate the relevant Government agency to initiate criminal proceedings against the person referred to in sub-section (1)

(3) The proceedings under this section shall be without prejudice to any other liability that the authority or officer or official or the person may incur under any other law for the time being in force.

(Disclaimer: The text of the above section is only for information. Team PkRevenue.com makes all efforts to provide the correct version of the text. However, the team PkRevenue.com is not responsible for any error or omission.)

Disclosure of information by public servant in tax matters