Tag: major penalty

  • Customs chemical examiner awarded ‘removal from service’

    Customs chemical examiner awarded ‘removal from service’

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has awarded major penalty of ‘removal from service’ upon a chemical examiner of Pakistan Customs Service (PCS) on the charges of misconduct and inefficiency.

    According to details received on Monday, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against Tahir Jamal, Deputy Assistant Chemical Examiner (BS-16), Collectorate of Customs Appraisement-West, Karachi under the Civil Servants (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules, 2020.

    READ MORE: President Alvi retains major penalty on NAB official

    Saad Atta Rabbani, Additional Collector (BS-19), Collectorate of Customs Appraisement (West), Karachi was appointed as Inquiry Officer vide Order of Inquiry dated August 04, 2021 who conducted inquiry under the Civil Servants (Efficiency & discipline) Rules, 2020 and submitted inquiry report to the FBR on January 05, 2022 with the findings and conclusion that the charges of “Inefficiency” and “Misconduct” stand fully established against the accused officer.

    On the basis of Inquiry Report, a Show Cause Notice was issued on March 31, 2022 to Tahir Jamal, Deputy Assistant Chemical Examiner (BS-16), Collectorate of Customs Appraisement (West), Karachi.

    READ MORE: Customs officer awarded ‘major penalty’ for corruption

    He submitted reply to the Show Cause Notice, which was received in the Board on April 15, 2022, wherein he stated that the Order of Inquiry dated August 04, 2021 is illegal and requires to be withdrawn.

    He further stated that he has challenged the Order of Inquiry by filing an appeal before the Federal Service Tribunal (FST). He also requested for personal hearing enabling him to explain his case in person as well.

    The Member (Admn/HR) / Authority afforded an opportunity of personal hearing to the accused on May 23, 2022.

    The Member (Admn/ HR) / Authority having carefully considered the record of the case, the Inquiry Report, reply to the Show Cause Notice and the submissions made by the accused during the personal hearing, has found no solid evidence and merits in the stance of the accused for submitting wrong/misleading laboratory test reports and remaining away from office w.e.f. August 07, 2018 till date.

    READ MORE: FBR terminates job of IRS officer on misconduct

    Accordingly, the Member (Admn/ HR) / Authority has observed that charges of “Inefficiency” and “misconduct” under Rule 3(a) and (b) of Civil Servants (E&D) Rules, 2020 stand established against the accused.

    The Authority has, therefore, imposed major penalty of “Removal from Service” upon Tahir Jamal, Deputy Assistant Chemical Examiner (BS-16), Collectorate of Customs Appraisement (West), Karachi under Rule 4(3)(d) of the Civil Servants (E&D) Rules, 2020.

    He will have a right to file appeal against this Order to the Appellate Authority under Civil Servants (Appeals) Rules, 1977 within a period of 30 days from the date of communication of this Notification.

    READ MORE: Customs officer awarded ‘dismissal from service’

  • President Alvi retains major penalty on NAB official

    President Alvi retains major penalty on NAB official

    ISLAMABAD: The President of Pakistan, Dr. Arif Alvi, has rejected the appeal of a NAB official to set aside the major penalty awarded to him over unlawful communication of official information for benefits of corruption.

    He also directed NAB to proceed against other officers involved in such cases and if found guilty punish them for doing corruption within the very institution that was responsible for controlling corruption.

    READ MORE: President Alvi directs bank to refund unfair recovery

    Noman Iqbal, Assistant Private Secretary (BS-16) had been awarded the major penalty of “reduction to a lower post for a period of five years” after it was proven that he copied and shared official information with unauthorized individuals.

    National Accountability Bureau (NAB), Karachi had conducted a fact-finding inquiry, based on a source report, under which confidential record was found in the mobile phone of appellant, which he was otherwise not authorized to hold.

    READ MORE: President Alvi rejects FBR plea in maladministration cases

    NAB had recommended initiating disciplinary proceedings against Iqbal. Initially, the matter was probed by Chairman Inspection and Monitoring Team, NAB (HQ), which revealed that Iqbal was involved in unlawful communication of official information inside and outside NAB in connivance with two other officials of NAB, Karachi.

    An inquiry committee was also constituted to probe into the matter that found the appellant guilty on charges of “misconduct” and “disclosure of official secrets”.

    A forensic analysis of appellant’s phone also found chats and documents which proved that he had copied and shared information with unauthorized individuals. Afterwards, Iqbal was awarded the penalty of reduction to a lower post for five years and two other officers involved were also penalized.

    READ MORE: Dr. Alvi orders action over misconduct with 82-year taxpayer

    Iqbal then submitted an appeal to the President, being the Appellate Authority, under NAB Employees Services Rules (TCS-2002) to set aside the major penalty.

    Chairman NAB through a summary, circulated through the Ministry of Law and Justice and endorsed by the Prime Minister, requested that the appeal of Iqbal may be rejected. President Dr Arif Alvi upheld the original decision on the grounds that Iqbal had not provided any cogent reason or additional justification to recall the earlier decision of major penalty.

    READ MORE: Dr. Alvi rejects banker’s plea in woman harassment case

    He emphasized that for such individuals this penalty does not do justice and wished that the punishment should have been harsher. “I direct NAB to complete the investigation against other officers involved and if found guilty punish them for the wrong done to the country and tarnishing its image,” the President noted while rejecting the appeal.

  • Customs officer awarded ‘major penalty’ for corruption

    Customs officer awarded ‘major penalty’ for corruption

    ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has imposed major penalty of ‘dismissal from service’ upon an officer of Pakistan Customs on the charges of corruption, misconduct and inefficiency.

    (more…)
  • Customs officer awarded ‘dismissal from service’

    Customs officer awarded ‘dismissal from service’

    ISLAMABAD: An officer of Pakistan Customs has been awarded the major penalty of ‘dismissal from service’ on charges of inefficiency and misconduct.

    According to an official order issued by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) on Wednesday, disciplinary proceedings under the Government Servants (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules, 1973 were initiated against Ghulam Hussain Khoso, Inspector (BS-16) posted in Collectorate of Customs (Enforcement), Quetta through a charge sheet issued on June 20, 2020 on account of ‘Inefficiency’ and ‘Misconduct’ under Rule-3(a)&(b) of the Government Servants (E&D) Rules, 1973.

    READ MORE: Customs I&I impounds smuggled fabric in Islamabad

    Akbar Jan, the then Deputy Collector (PCS/BS-18), Model Customs Collectorate (Enforcement & Compliance), Quetta was appointed as Inquiry Officer to conduct inquiry into the case on account of acts of omission and commission as detailed in the Charge Sheet / Statement of Allegations.

    The inquiry officer submitted the report dated October 09, 2020. According to the report the charges of inefficiency and misconduct were established against the accused officer.

    READ MORE: MCC Gwadar seizes huge quantity of methamphetamine

    Accordingly, the Collector, Collectorate of Customs (Enforcement), Quetta / Authorized Officer served Show Cause Notice dated November 26, 2020 upon the accused.

    Upon receipt of reply to the Show Cause Notice, the accused was granted personal hearings on December 14, 2020, December 22, 2020 and December 31, 2020 to show cause in his defence.

    READ MORE: Peshawar Customs seizes narcotics worth Rs80 million

    The authorized officer, after considering the inquiry report, reply to Show Cause Notice and oral submissions made during the personal hearings, found the accused guilty of “Inefficiency” & “Misconduct” under Rule-3(a)&(b) of the Government Servants (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules, 1973 and recommended to the Authority i.e Member (Administration/Human Resource), FBR to impose major penalty of “Dismissal from Service” upon the accused officer as prescribed under Rule-4(1)(b)(iv) of the Government Servants (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules, 1973.

    READ MORE: Gwadar Customs seizes opium worth Rs80 million

    The Member (Admn/HR) / Authority after having considered all aspects of the case and submissions made by the accused during the personal hearing granted to him by the Authority, has imposed major penalty of “Dismissal from Service” upon Ghulam Hussain Khoso, Inspector (BS-16), Collectorate of Customs Enforcement, Quetta under Rule-4(1)(b)(iv) of the Government Servants (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules, 1973.

    The accused shall have the right of appeal as admissible under the Civil Servants (Appeal) Rules, 1977, according to the FBR.

    READ MORE: FBR invites applications for 952 vacant posts in Pakistan Customs

  • FBR terminates job of IRS officer on misconduct

    FBR terminates job of IRS officer on misconduct

    ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has terminated the job of BS-17 official of Inland Revenue Service (IRS) on the charges of misconduct.

    The FBR issued an office order on Friday to notify the major penalty of ‘dismissal from service’ upon the officer.

    READ MORE: Senior FBR auditor awarded ‘dismissal from service’ for corruption

    The FBR said that disciplinary proceedings were initiated against Masud Humayun (IRS/BS-17/Prob), posted as Assistant Director, Additional Directorate of Internal Audit (IR) Gujranwala on account of multiple offences including exchange of Answer Book, cheating, lying, deceitful conduct and manhandling of the examination supervisor, a BS-19 officer while taking paper of FPO Exam i.e. Principle of Accountancy and unauthorized absence w.e.f. 17.08.2020; constituting “inefficiency” and “misconduct” in terms the Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 2020.

    READ MORE: Customs official awarded ‘dismissal from service’ for misconduct

    The Revenue Secretary/Chairman, FBR, while dispensing with holding of formal inquiry under Civil Servants (E&D) Rules, 2020, issued an Order under Rule7 along with Show Cause Notice dated October 12, 2021. However, no reply, to the said show cause notice (within the stipulated time) was received.

    The FBR chairman Chairman after examining the facts and legal position of the case, found the accused officer guilty of the charges of “inefficiency” and “misconduct” levelled against him.

    READ MORE: Three FBR officials awarded ‘dismissal from service’ for misconduct

    The FBR chairman after having considered all aspects of the case, has decided to impose major penalty of “dismissal from service” upon Masud Humayun (IRS-BS-17/Prob) under the Civil Servants (E&D) Rules, 2020.

    The period of his unauthorized absence from duty w.e.f. August 17, 2020 shall be treated as extraordinary leave without pay.

    Masud Humayun / the accused officer, shall have the right to file departmental appeal within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of issuance of this notification.

    READ MORE: FBR auditor awarded dismissal from service for availing NAB plea bargain

  • Senior FBR auditor awarded ‘dismissal from service’ for corruption

    Senior FBR auditor awarded ‘dismissal from service’ for corruption

    ISLAMABAD: A senior auditor of Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has been awarded major penalty of ‘dismissal from service’ on allegations of corruption, misconduct and inefficiency.

    The FBR on Friday through a notification said that disciplinary proceedings under Government Servants (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules, 1973 were initiated against Gulraiz Ahmad Raza, Senior Auditor (BS-16), while he was posted in Regional Tax Office-III, Karachi (Now RTO-II, Karachi) through charge sheet issued on January 05, 2016.

    READ MORE: Customs official awarded ‘dismissal from service’ for misconduct

    Abdul Rehman Khilji, then Additional Commissioner, CTO Karachi was appointed as Inquiry Officer to conduct inquiry on account of acts of omission and commission committed by the accused officer; constituting  Inefficiency,  Misconduct and Corruption.

    The inquiry report proved the charges levelled against the officer.

    On the basis of the inquiry report, show cause notice No. 2(856)/2010-MIR-III/104869-R dated 19.07.2021 was issued to the accused officer by the Authorized Officer i.e. Chief (HRM-IR) with the directions to submit reply by 09.08.2021. Later on, upon the request of the accused officer date of submission of reply was extended up to 10.10.2021.

    READ MORE: FBR auditor awarded dismissal from service for availing NAB plea bargain

    In his reply to the show cause notice vide letter dated 07.09.2021, the accused officer neither commented upon the merits of the case nor submitted any reply to the charges but only requested for provision of previous inquiry report which was regretted vide letter 2(856)/2010-MIR-III/155893-R dated 27.09.2021.

    He was also granted an opportunity of personal hearing vide No. 2(856)/2010-MIR-III/155893-R dated 27.09.2021 on 18.10.2021. Nevertheless, the accused did not avail the opportunity of personal hearing and did not show up on the due date of hearing.

    It is pertinent to mention that clarification was sought from Establishment Division as to whether who would be Authorized Officer for the inquiries initiated before 08.06.2017.

    READ MORE: Single sales tax return to eliminate fake, flying invoices

    Establishment Division being custodian of the Civil Servants Act & Rules made thereunder vide Sr.13(10) of schedule II of the Rules of Business 1973 advised vide their O.M. No. 16/18/2000-R-II dated 03.06.2021 that pending cases initiated under Board’s Notification dated 20.04.2010 would continue to be processed by the same Authorized Officer and Authority.

    In light of the above and on the basis of the report of the Inquiry Officer, the Authorized Officer, as notified vide Board’s Notification No. 1014-M.III/2010 dated 20.04.2010, under rule 5(1)(iv) of the Government Servants (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules, 1973, recommended to the Authority i.e. Member (Admn/HR) for imposition of one of the major penalties, as defined in Rule 4(1)(b)(ii),(iii) & (iv) of the rules ibid upon the accused officer.

    READ MORE: Annual sales tax collection from imports climbs up 27%

    Now, therefore, the Authority, after considering the facts of the case, has imposed the major penalty of “Dismissal from Service” under Rule 4(1)(b)(iv) of the Government Servants (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules, 1973 upon Gulraiz Ahmad Raza, Senior Auditor (BS-16), FBR (Hq), Islamabad.

    Gulraiz Ahmad Raza shall have the right of appeal, as admissible under the Civil Servants (Appeals) Rules, 1977.

  • IRS officer awarded major penalty for corruption

    IRS officer awarded major penalty for corruption

    ISLAMABAD: An officer of the Inland Revenue Service (IRS) has been awarded a major penalty of ‘dismissal from service’ after the officer was found guilty of corruption and misconduct.

    The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) on a complaint of a taxpayer initiated an inquiry against Syed Zubair Shah, a BS-19 officer of IRS.

    M/s. Pak Steel Re-Rolling Mills, Islamabad lodged a complaint against the IRS officer last year.

    The FBR appointed Ms. Qaisara Fatima (IRS/BS-20) as Inquiry Officer to probe the charges against the accused officer. The inquiry officer submitted a report on December 04, 2020 with the findings that the charges of corruption and misconduct were proved against the officer.

    On the basis of the inquiry report, a Show Cause Notice was issued on 22.12.2020 to the accused officer with the directions to show cause within seven (07) days of the receipt as to why one or more penalties including Major Penalty of “Dismissal from Service” under Government Servants (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules, 1973 may not be imposed upon him.

    The accused officer furnished a reply to the Show Cause Notice and denied charges leveled against him and sought an opportunity of personal hearing which was granted by the Authorized Officer on 21.01.2021.

    The accused officer challenged the evidence and the Authorized Officer directed the Inquiry Officer to get a forensic audit conducted from the Cyber Crime Wing of FIA. The Inquiry Officer repeatedly directed the accused officer to get his voice recorded for purpose of his voice samples to be produced before FIA authorities; however, there the accused was reluctant and avoided getting his voice recorded. Accordingly, to decide the case another opportunity for a personal hearing was granted by the Authorized Officer on 08.11.2021.

    Moreover, the inquiry officer sent the evidence for a forensic audit to the FIA, which contained the voice of the accused and Chief Accountant of M/s. Pak Steel Re-Rolling Mills, Islamabad. The report received from FIA on the telephonic conversation clearly states that spectrogram analysis of audio files obtained from the cell phone of the complainant depicts no sudden variations in pitch and frequency. Therefore, the FIA’s report regarding the conversation recorded on the CD (evidence) confirmed the voice/conversation of the accused officer with the complainant.

    After examining the record of the case, written reply of the accused officer including a reply to the Show Cause Notice and findings of the inquiry officer, the Authorized Officer recommended imposition of a major penalty of “dismissal from service” under Rule 4(1)(b)(iv) of Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973 upon Syed Zubair Shah (IRS/BS-19).

    The Competent Authority, i.e Secretary Revenue Division after considering all the aspects and material relating to the case, defense of the accused officer including a reply to the Show Cause Notice, findings of the inquiry officer, and recommendations of the Authorized officer, has decided to impose a major penalty of “dismissal from service” under Rule 4(1)(b)(iv) of Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973 upon Syed Zubair Shah (IRS/BS-19) presently posted as Secretary (Admin Pool), Federal Board of Revenue (HQ), Islamabad (under suspension).

    In light of the above, a major penalty of “dismissal from service” is imposed upon Syed Zubair Shah (IRS/BS-19), Secretary (Admin Pool), Federal Board of Revenue (HQ), Islamabad as laid down in sub-clause (iv) of clause (b) of sub Rule (1) of Rule 4 of the Government Servants (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules, 1973 with immediate effect.

    Syed Zubair Shah (IRS/BS-19), shall have the right to appeal to the Appellate Authority under Civil Servants (Appeals) Rules, 1977 within a period of 30 days from the date of communication of this Notification, as provided under the relevant Rules.

  • Senior tax auditor awarded ‘dismissal from service’

    Senior tax auditor awarded ‘dismissal from service’

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has imposed major penalty of ‘dismissal from service’ upon a senior tax auditor for misconduct.

    Syed Ali Hussain, Senior Auditor (BS-16), Large Taxpayers Office, has been removed from service for absence from office without authorized leave.

    According to an office order issued on Wednesday, the FBR said disciplinary proceedings were initiated against Syed Ali Hussain, Senior Auditor (BS-16), Large Taxpayers Office, Lahore under Government Servants (Efficiency & Discipline), Rules 1973 on charges of “Misconduct” in terms of Rule 3(b) ibid.

    The Chief Commissioner, Large Taxpayers Office, Lahore being Authorized officer appointed Dr. Muhammad Sarmad Qureshi, then Commissioner-IR, (Legal Zone) Large Taxpayers Office, Lahore as Inquiry Officer. Charge Sheet and Statement of Allegations were issued on 01.02.2021 on following charges:

    i. Syed Ali Hussain, Senior Auditor, Large Taxpayers Office, Lahore (the then Large Taxpayers Unit, Lahore) was allowed casual leave for 5 days from 05.11.2018 to 09.11.2018 and he was due in office on 12.11.20108 after the weekly holidays on Saturday and Sunday i.e. 10th and 11th November, 2018. As such he is absent from duty since 12.11.2018.

    ii. He willfully travelled outside Pakistan frequently without prior approval and sanction of ex-Pakistan leave from the Competent Authority during the period.

    iii. Passport No. JR5159161 was issued to him on 27th July, 2016 showing his profession as “Government Employee” but he applied on 18th October, 2018 for the modification of his passport, on the basis of production of fake resignation letter at the time of interview and willfully got a modified passport bearing No. JR5159162 showing his profession as “Other”.

    iv. He sent an application through Mr. Atif Noor on 25th April, 2019 requesting for leave for 4 weeks alongwith OPD slip dated 25th April, 2019 showing that he was examined by the Medical Officer of Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore who recommended complete bed rest for 4 weeks whereas Syed Ali Hussain was out of Pakistan on 25th April, 2019.

    In spite of proper service of Charge Sheet and Statement of Allegations sent through UMS followed by final hearing notice sent through UMS and service by hand upon his brother namely Syed SajjadHaider s/o Syed Mehboob Ali CNIC 35202-2414918-1 at House No. 1-A, Qureshi Street No. 44, Sanda Kalan, Lahore on 09.03.2021 which was also affix at the same premises, the accused failed to respond.

    Keeping in view the constant non-compliance from accused, a Show Cause Notice dated 17.03.2021 and the corrigendum was published in the “Daily Pakistan”& “Business Recorder” dated 16.04.2021 and 25.04.2021 respectively. In absence of any defence the inquiry officer concluded that all charges levelled against the accused are established and submitted the inquiry report dated 08.06.2021 to the Authorized Officer.

    Chief Commissioner, Large Taxpayers Office, Lahore being Authorized Officer in this case, after considering all aspect of the case was of the view that the charges of “Misconduct” against the officer stand established. The Authorized Officer i.e. Chief Commissioner, LTO Lahore therefore recommended imposition of the Major Penalty of “Dismissal from Service” upon the accused in terms of Rule 5(1)(iv) read with 4(1)(b)(iv) of the Government Servants (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules, 1973.

    The authority i.e. (Admn/HR) FBR has imposed the Major Penalty of “Dismissal from Service” upon the accused under Rule Rule 5(1)(iv) read with 4(1)(b)(iv) of the Government Servants (Efficiency & Discipline), Rules 1973 with immediate effect. Period of absence from duty w.e.f. 12.11.2018 till dismissal shall be treated as extraordinary leave (EOL), without pay.

    Syed Ali Hussain, Senior Auditor (BS-16), shall have right of appeal to the appellate Authority under Civil Servants (Appeal) Rules, 1977 within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of communication of this notification / order.

  • Tax auditor awarded major penalty for misconduct

    Tax auditor awarded major penalty for misconduct

    In a recent development, the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has awarded with a major penalty to a tax auditor, Sardar Abdul Rab Nashtar, Assistant Director (Audit) of the Inland Revenue Service (IRS).

    (more…)
  • IR officer awarded major penalty of removal from service

    IR officer awarded major penalty of removal from service

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has imposed major penalty of ‘removal from service’ an officer of BS-18 Inland Revenue Service (IRS) for misconduct.

    According to a notification issued by the FBR stated that disciplinary proceedings were initiated against Syed Nasir Jamal Shah (IRS/BS-18) Deputy Commissioner-IR, Corporate Tax Office, Lahore under Rule 7 of Civil Servants (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules, 2020 on account of unauthorized absence from duty w.e.f. September 28, 2020; through Direct Show Cause Notice dated January 11, 2021 on the charges of misconduct.

    Syed Nasir Jamal Shah (IRS/BS-18) furnished reply to the show cause notice wherein the officer stated that he applied for leave of 400 days and submitted application to the Commissioner-IR, CTO, Lahore on November 03, 2020 for onward submission to the Member (Admn), FBR, Islamabad and the same was forwarded to the Board on November 09, 2020.

    The officer further stated that the allegation of absence without any intimation is based on some omission in record. The accused officer also requested for opportunity of personal hearing before finalization of the proceedings. Secretary, Revenue Division/Chairman, FBR being Authority in the instant case appointed Member (Admn/HR) as Hearing Officer to grant personal hearing to the accused officer under Rule 17 of Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 2020.

    Hearing Officer/Member (Admn/HR) granted personal hearing to the accused officer on March 15, 2021. During the course of personal hearing the accused officer was asked to put forward his defence, but the accused officer did not have anything substantial to elaborate in his defence.

    The contentions of the officer that his higher officers in CTO, Lahore were aware of his leave submission was also found unsatisfactory in purview of the prevailing instruct ions of the government which are very clear i.e. the officer cannot absent himself until and unless the leave applied by the officer is approved by the Competent Authority.

    Reference in this regard is made to Establishment Division’s O.M No.1/34/57-ME dated 12-11-1957 which states that “a government servant should not absent himself from office without leave”.

    Furthermore, Establishment Division’s O.M.No.6/3/81-RI(DI) dated 26-07-1981 states that “a civil servant continues to be in service till his resignation is accepted and cannot absent himself from his duties without proper leave” Establishment Division’s O.M No.15/6/85-R.2 dated 03-03-1986 states that “if a civil servants absents himself from duty, till his resignation is accepted by the Competent Authority, he is liable to be proceeded against under the (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules which may also result in dismissal from Government Service”. Moreover, leave application of Syed Nasir Jamal Shah (IRS/BS-18) was silent about date of availing of the requested leave.

    The failure to comply with the instructions of the government construes misconduct on part of the officer. Furthermore, during the case of personal hearing the accused officer failed to bring up justification/reasons to defend his unauthorized absence from duty. Attitude and conduct of the accused officer was highly casual and irresponsible.

    Information collected from field revealed that he is running his own academy in Lahore, doing business and is not at all interested in government service and keeping this as a standby option.

    After considering the charges framed in the Show Cause Notice and available record including the reply furnished by the accused officer, the Hearing Officer came to the conclusion that the accused officer has nothing new to add in his defence.

    Hearing Officer/Member (Admn/HR) forwarded the case record to the Authority i.e. Secretary, Revenue Division/Chairman, FBR for decision.

    Secretary, Revenue Division/Chairman, FBR being Authority in the instant case has decided the major penalty of “Removal from Service” upon Syed Nasir Jamal Shah (IRS/BS-18) Deputy Commissioner-IR, Corporate Tax Office, Lahore under rule 4(3)(d) of Civil Servants (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules, 2020 with immediate effect.

    The period of unauthorized absence from duty w.e.f. 28.09.2020 of Syed Nasir Jamal Shah (IRS/BS-18) shall be treated as Extra Ordinary Leave (without pay). Outstanding dues/recoverable amount shall be recovered from Syed Nasir Jamal Shah (IRS/BS-18).

    Syed Nasir Jamal Shah (IRS/BS-18) shall have a right to appeal to the Appellate Authority under Civil Servants (Appeal) Rules, 1977 within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of communication of this notification.