KARACHI: Following are the exchange rates of foreign currencies in Pak Rupee (PKR) on October 5, 2021 (The rates are updated at 12:42 AM):
Currency
Buying
Selling
Australian Dollar
123.10
125.10
Bahrain Dinar
386.70
388.46
Canadian Dollar
135.60
137.60
China Yuan
23.75
23.90
Danish Krone
23.45
23.75
Euro
198.60
200.10
Hong Kong Dollar
16.65
16.90
Indian Rupee
2.03
2.10
Japanese Yen
1.41
1.44
Kuwaiti Dinar
481.60
484.10
Malaysian Ringgit
36.45
36.80
NewZealand $
96.30
97
Norwegians Krone
17.50
17.75
Omani Riyal
392.70
394.70
Qatari Riyal
39.80
40.40
Saudi Riyal
45.05
45.55
Singapore Dollar
122.60
124.10
Swedish Korona
18.30
18.55
Swiss Franc
159.80
160.70
Thai Bhat
4.80
4.90
U.A.E Dirham
46.55
47.05
UK Pound Sterling
232.10
234.60
US Dollar
172.40
173.40
Disclaimer: Team PKRevenue.com provides the available rates of the open market, which are subject to change every hour. Team PKRevenue.com provides the available exchange rates at the time of posting the story. So the team is not responsible for any inaccuracy of the data.
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s trade deficit has doubled in first quarter (July – September) 2021/2022 owing to sharp increase in import bill, according to data released by the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) on Monday.
The trade deficit has ballooned by 100.62 per cent to $11.66 billion during the first quarter of the current fiscal year as compared with the deficit of $5.81 billion in the corresponding quarter of the last fiscal year.
The import bill posted an unprecedented growth of 65 per cent to $18.63 billion during the first quarter of the current fiscal year as compared with $11.28 billion in the corresponding quarter of the last fiscal year.
The exports of the country registered 27 per cent growth to $6.96 billion during July – September 2021 as compared with $5.47 billion in the same period of the last fiscal year.
The trade deficit on year on year (YoY) basis in September 2021 widened by 70 per cent to $4.1 billion as compared with the deficit of $2.41 billion. The import bill recorded an increase of 50.78 per cent to $6.48 billion in September 2021 as compared with $4.29 billion in the same month of the last year.
The exports also exhibited a growth of 26.13 per cent to $2.38 billion in September 2021 as compared with $1.88 billion in the same month of the last year.
KARACHI: The Pak Rupee (PKR) fell to a new record low against the dollar at Rs170.80 on Monday. The high demand for import and corporate payments kept the local unit under pressure.
Currency experts attributed the fresh low of rupee to the opening of the market after two weekly-holiday. They further said that higher import bill also escalated the demand for the dollar.
The rupee hit all-time low at Rs170.66 against the dollar on September 30, 2021.
The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) last week announced measures to discourage imports and support balance of payment. However, these measures have failed so far to support the local currency.
Section 227A and Section 227B of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 have laid down procedure for reward to officials of Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) and whistleblowers in recovery of tax evaded amount.
227A. Reward to officers and officials of Inland Revenue.— (1) In cases (i) involving concealment or evasion of income tax and other taxes, cash reward shall, only after realization of part or whole of the taxes involved in such cases, be sanctioned to the officers and officials of Inland Revenue for their meritorious conduct in such cases and (ii) for other meritorious services and to the informer providing credible information leading to such detection.
(2) The Board may, by notification in the official Gazette, prescribe the procedure in this behalf and also specify the apportionment of reward sanctioned under this section for individual performance or to collective welfare of the officers and officials of Inland Revenue.
227B. Reward to whistleblowers.—(1) The Board may sanction reward to whistleblowers in cases of concealment or evasion of income tax, fraud, corruption or misconduct providing credible information leading to such detection of tax.
(2) The Board may, by notification in the official Gazette, prescribe the procedure in this behalf and also specify the apportionment of reward sanctioned under this section for whistleblowers.
(3) The claim for reward by the whistleblower shall be rejected, if—
(a) the information provided is of no value;
(aa) the information is not supported by any evidence;
(b) the Board already had the information;
(c) the information was available in public records; or
(d) no collection of taxes is made from the information provided
from which the Board can pay the reward.
(4) For the purpose of this section, “whistleblower” means a person who reports concealment or evasion of income tax leading to detection or collection of taxes, fraud, corruption or misconduct, to the competent authority having power to take action against the person or an income tax authority committing fraud, corruption, misconduct, or involved in concealment or evasion of taxes.”
Following are the text of Section 227C, Section 227D and Section 227E:
227C. Restriction on purchase of certain assets. [this section has been deleted through Finance Act, 2019]
227D.- Automated impersonal tax regime.- (1) The Board may design an alternate impersonal taxation regime whereby personal interaction will be minimized.
(2) The Board may, by notification in the official Gazette, prescribe the procedure in this behalf.
(3) This section shall be applicable only for low risk and compliant taxpayers as may be prescribed.
227E. E-hearing.— (1) The Board may design and prescribe e-hearing module for the purpose of conducting hearings, granting opportunity of being heard and electronically receiving any information for the purpose of this Ordinance.
(2) The recording of e-hearing proceedings shall be admissible as evidence before any forum or court of law for the purpose of this Ordinance.
(3) The Board may make rules for the purpose of this section.
(Disclaimer: The text of the above section is only for information. Team PkRevenue.com makes all efforts to provide the correct version of the text. However, the team PkRevenue.com is not responsible for any error or omission.)
Section 227 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 has explained that no suit or other legal proceedings would be brought in any civil court against any order made under this ordinance.
227. Bar of suits in Civil Courts.— (1) No suit or other legal proceeding shall be brought in any Civil Court against any order made or any notice issued under this Ordinance, and no prosecution, suit or other proceedings shall be made against any person for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done under this Ordinance or any rules or orders made or notices issued thereunder.
“Explanation.—For the removal of doubt, it is clarified that Civil Court includes any court exercising power of the civil court.”
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, no investigation or inquiry shall be undertaken or initiated by any governmental agency against any officer or official for anything done in his official capacity under this Ordinance, rules, instructions or direction made or issued there-under without the prior approval of the Board.
(Disclaimer: The text of the above section is only for information. Team PkRevenue.com makes all efforts to provide the correct version of the text. However, the team PkRevenue.com is not responsible for any error or omission.)
226. Computation of limitation period.—In computing the period of limitation, there shall be excluded –
(a) in the case of an appeal or an application under this Ordinance, the day on which the order complained of was served and, if the taxpayer was not furnished with a copy of the order when the notice of the order was served on the taxpayer, the time requisite for obtaining a copy of such order; and
(b) in the case of an assessment or other proceeding under this Ordinance,—
(i) the period, if any, for which such proceedings were stayed by any Court, Appellate Tribunal or any other authority; or
(ii) the period, if any, for which any proceeding for the tax year remained pending before any Court, Appellate Tribunal or any other authority.
(Disclaimer: The text of the above section is only for information. Team PkRevenue.com makes all efforts to provide the correct version of the text. However, the team PkRevenue.com is not responsible for any error or omission.)
Section 225 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 grants the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) the authority to continue or initiate proceedings against companies undergoing liquidation without the need for leave from the Court.
221. Rectification of mistakes.— (1) The Commissioner, the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Appellate Tribunal may, by an order in writing, amend any order passed by him to rectify any mistake apparent from the record on his or its own motion or any mistake brought to his or its notice by a taxpayer or, in the case of the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Appellate Tribunal, the Commissioner.
(1A) The Commissioner may, by an order in writing, amend any order passed under the repealed Ordinance by the Deputy Commissioner, or an Income Tax Panel, as defined in section 2 of the repealed Ordinance to rectify any mistake apparent from the record on his own motion or any mistake brought to his notice by a taxpayer and the provisions of sub-section (2), sub-section (3) and sub-section (4) shall apply in like manner as these apply to an order under sub-section (1).
(2) No order under sub-section (1) which has the effect of increasing an assessment, reducing a refund or otherwise applying adversely to the taxpayer shall be made unless the taxpayer has been given a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
(3) Where a mistake apparent on the record is brought to the notice of the Commissioner or Commissioner (Appeals), as the case may be, and no order has been made under sub-section (1) before the expiration of the financial year next following the date on which the mistake was brought to their notice, the mistake shall be treated as rectified and all the provisions of this Ordinance shall have effect accordingly.
(4) No order under sub-section (1) may be made after five years from the date of the order sought to be rectified.
(Disclaimer: The text of the above section is only for information. Team PkRevenue.com makes all efforts to provide the correct version of the text. However, the team PkRevenue.com is not responsible for any error or omission.)
