Islamabad, June 7, 2025 – The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has imposed the penalty of censure on a customs appraising officer after an inquiry found him guilty of inefficiency during an official examination process.
According to an FBR circular dated June 5, 2025, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against Ali Raza, a BS-16 appraising officer posted at the Collectorate of Customs Appraisement (West), Lahore. The officer faced charges of inefficiency, misconduct, and corruption related to his examination report of Goods Declaration No. LAWl-HC-1866, dated September 28, 2024.
Muhammad Rizwan, a BS-19 officer, was appointed as the inquiry officer to assess the matter. After thoroughly appraising the evidence, he concluded in his report dated May 27, 2025, that while charges of misconduct and corruption were not substantiated, the charge of inefficiency stood proven. He recommended the minor penalty of censure.
Following the report, a show-cause notice was issued to the appraising officer on June 2, 2025. In his reply submitted a day later, the officer denied all allegations and requested a personal hearing. This was granted on June 5, 2025, under Rule-17 of the Civil Servants (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules, 2020.
During the hearing, the officer explained that it was his first week in the Examination Hall and the report in question was his first assignment. He claimed he made multiple attempts to seek guidance from senior officers but received no assistance. Ultimately, he submitted the report based on his understanding, as it was not feasible to delay the process indefinitely. He emphasized that the error was unintentional and that the later re-examination, which detected duty and tax discrepancies, was based on issues he had already raised.
The departmental representative, Assistant Collector Ms. Sara Batool, acknowledged the officer’s inexperience but maintained that his inefficiency was evident.
The FBR Member (Admn/HR), acting as the authority in the case, reviewed the records and testimonies. While noting the officer’s lack of experience, the authority agreed with the inquiry findings and approved the recommendation of censure.
As a result, the appraising officer’s performance allowance has been suspended for six months. He may reapply afterward, subject to reevaluation. The officer also has the right to appeal this decision within 30 days under the Civil Servants (Appeals) Rules, 1977.
This marks a clear example of the FBR holding its officers accountable and actively appraising their conduct to ensure transparency and efficiency within its ranks.