Tag: budget proposals

  • PBC presents tax proposals for reducing cost of doing business

    PBC presents tax proposals for reducing cost of doing business

    KARACHI: Pakistan Business Council (PBC) has suggested measures for reducing cost of doing business and promoting manufacturing and industrialization.

    In its tax proposals for budget 20119/2020, the PBC suggested following measures for reducing cost of doing business:

    Exemption from collection of Withholding tax under section 148 at import stage & exemption for manufacturing concerns under Section 153

    Procedures and rules for obtaining exemption certificates for import of plant & machinery and Raw material by tax payers have serious restrictions which causes hardship.

    Proposed Change

    Corporate manufacturing sector should be excluded from the purview of income tax withholding at import stage under section 148 as well as from tax deduction on local supply under section 153. Similar exemption is already given to the greenfield industries through the Finance Supplementary Second Amendment Act 2019 announced in March 2019. The same exemption, however, is not available, for the brownfield expansion.

    Moreover, all the companies engaged in manufacturing should be exempt from withholding of tax under section 153. Similar exemption is available for Sales Tax in the Sales Tax Special Procedure (Withholding) Rules, 2007 via SRO 586 dated July 1, 2017.

    Alternatively, issuance of exemption certificate from withholding under section 148 and 153 should automatically trigger on the FBR portal based on payment of quarterly advance tax under section 147 to avoid harassment of genuine taxpayers. This will enable taxpayers to avoid creating huge tax refunds and focus on more expansion.

    Rationale for Change

    This would increase the investments for brownfield capacity expansion as well and would provide a meaningful relief (similar to greenfield expansion) with regard to BMR and extension/ expansion. Further, it will also attract foreign direct investment in the form of new expansion ventures as well as partnerships and hence will also result in export growth.

    Estimate and Payment of Advance Tax Section 147

    The time for making the estimate of income has been changed by the Finance Act, 2015 from ‘before the last installment is due’. 50 percent of the difference is required to be paid along with the 2nd installment and 50 percent of the difference with 3rd and 4th installments in two equal installments.

    Furthermore; Finance Act, 2018 has required the taxpayer to submit the actual turnover of completed quarters of the tax year with estimate (submitted earlier) and reasons for variations thereto along with documentary evidences. The Commissioner is now also empowered to reject the estimate, if he is not satisfied by the reasons and evidence of such variation.

    Proposal

    We recommend that this sub-section be restored to its original position (before finance bill 2018-19) whereby the taxpayers can file its best judged estimate without any questioning by the tax department. Moreover; section 205 (1B) relating to default surcharge becomes redundant if inquiry is made at the end of every quarter.

    Rationale

    This amendment / addition to the existing provisions of advance tax estimates may lead to unnecessary harassment of the advance income Tax payers, who are usually from the organized corporate sector for the simple fact that it is totally impracticable to provide detailed documentary evidences of the ‘estimated expenses or deductions’ which are to happen in the future and have to be worked out by the tax payer based on the business forecasts and projections.

    Section 147(6), as amended vide Finance Act, 2018, also empowers the Commissioner to consider rejection of the estimate, if the above information is not made available by the tax payer; which is a very harsh and authoritative provision, since the tax payer is always in the best position to make their own estimates since he /she knows their business.

    Alternate Corporate Tax

    Under Section 113, corporates are subject to one of three income tax regimes-Alternate Corporate Tax (ACT), Minimum Turnover Tax or Normal Tax Regime.

    Proposal

    ACT is a major hindrance towards capital investment as newly incorporated companies or those companies, which make huge capital investments for expansion, extension or BMR are not practically able to get the benefits of initial allowance owing to the fact that such allowance is available only against the taxable income whereas in case of huge capital investment resulting in higher initial allowance and consequently lower taxable income, tax payer usually falls under the ACT regime against which the benefit of adjustment of initial allowance is not available.

    Rationale

    It results in triple jeopardy (after NTR and Minimum Tax under section 113) and is most likely to be not accepted by Court as only one capacity tax is possible as per the constitution read with SCP order in case of Elahi Cotton.

    Moreover, real benefit of initial allowance/ first year allowance is not available owing to the applicability of ACT.

    SRO 250 dated February 26, 2019

    SRO has been introduced for the electronic monitoring and tracking of the goods mentioned therein i.e. goods of tobacco, beverages, sugar, fertilizer and cement industries. Fee for the operation of this SRO will be recovered by the licensee (private firms) from the companies in the above mentioned industries.

    Proposal

    This SRO should be amended suitably to ensure that the Administrative cost of operation /activities in this SRO should not be borne by the manufacturers of goods.

    Rationale

    It is mentioned in the SRO that the cost of activities in relation to this SRO will be borne by the manufacturers of goods. This is against the main objective of the current government to provide ease of doing business for the manufacturing industries since, as per this SRO, the teams operating this electronic monitoring equipment will sit at the manufacturing premises of the companies and the cost of the operating such equipment along with licensee marking fee will be recovered from the manufacturing companies.

    Rule 43, Income Tax Rule 2002

    Presently the taxpayer has to deposit the withholding tax deducted fortnightly, i.e. within seven days from the end of each week ending on every Sunday.

    In addition, certain WHT agents do not deposit on time and some agents do not deposit at all. This also includes agencies /govt. Organizations in respect of WHT, where CPR is not provided hence revenue leakages to government in the absence of WHT deposit.

    On the other hand, where WHT is deducted by agencies /govt. Organizations but do not provide system (IRIS) generated CPR as they do not enter in the system. Therefore assesse cannot get input benefit due to non-availability of CPR from IRIS system on account of WHT in spite.

    Proposal

    Timeline of 7 to 13 days be extended to one week after the month. IRIS system should be applicable for all withholding agent including agencies /government organizations and CPR in respect of WHT Facing authority be available from IRIS.

    Rationale

    Ease of doing business and facilitate withholding tax agents. Control Revenue leakage as well assesse can claim input tax properly thus neither it is loss to authority nor the assesse. In the absence of non-availiblity of CPR, this is an extra cost for doing business.

    Section 8(1)(j)

    introduced through Finance Act, 2015, where in a restriction has been imposed on claiming input on services which are not allowed in provincial sales tax on services Act(s).

    Proposal

    Section 8(1)(j)of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 should be deleted.

    Rationale

    Since input tax sales tax on reduced rate services is not available for adjustment, this increases the cost of doing business. Currently there are more than 25 services under respective provincial sales tax on services Act(s).

    PBC is pursuing this matter with the provincial authorities also.

    Section 156-Prizes and winnings:

    Section 156 of the ITO 2001 requires a Company to deduct 20 percent tax on “prize offered by companies for promotion of sale”

    Prize and winnings-(1) Every person paying of prize bonds, or winning from a raffle, lottery, prize on winning a quiz, prize offered by companies for promotion of sale to end consumers, or cross-word puzzle shall deduct tax…………..

    The clear intention of this section is to capture tax through withholding at source from persons who are recipients of these prizes or winnings; the intention is not to tax any person who belongs to the supply chain of the companies who offer prize for promotion of sales. The income of the supply chain i.e. dealers, distributors is subjected to withholding tax in the shape of withholding taxes imposed under separate withholding regimes. It is therefore suggested that to clear any ambiguity in law regarding application of this section, it may be amended to add the term “end consumers” to oust any person in the supply chain from the ambit of this section.

    Section 153(1)(a)

    Section 153(1)(a) withholding income tax on supplies by distributors of FMCG products is two percent for companies and 2.5 percent for others. This rate is quite high for industries dealing in bulk commodities/large volume but low margin products.

    Proposal

    Rate for withholding tax on FMCG distributors should be aligned with section 113 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 i.e. Minimum tax on FMCG distributor is 0.2 percent.

    Rationale

    Current situation is leading to build up huge refunds / blockage of funds for the distributors since minimum tax charging rate is 0.2 percent whereas withholding is up to 2.5 percent.

    Due to amendments in the definition of withholding agents the tax withheld on the receipts of the distributors has increased significantly.

    Section 8B

    (1)Not withstanding anything contained in this Act, in relation to a tax period, a registered person shall not be allowed to adjust input tax in excess of ninety percent of the output tax for that period.

    Proposal

    (1) Not withstanding anything contained in this Act, in relation to a tax period, a registered person shall not be allowed to adjust input tax in excess of ninety-five percent of the output tax for that period.

    Rationale

    Will allow better management of cash flows

    Clause 18B of Part ii of the Second Schedule-Tax credit for Shariah Complaint Companies.

    Income Tax Ordinance on the one hand requires the corporate sector to fulfill the prescribed Shariah compliance criteria approved by SECP (as per Clause 18B of Part ii of the second schedule to the Tax Ordinance) whereas, on the other hand, Income Tax Rules, as prescribed by FBR (via Rule 231H )still remain applicable and are in conflict with the SECP Regulations.

    Further, Clause 18B of Part ii of the Second Schedule is reproduced below:

    The rate of tax as specified in Division II of Part I of the First Schedule shall be reduced by 2 percent in case of a company whose shares are traded on Stock Exchange if :

    (a)it fulfils prescribed Shariah compliant criteria approved by State Bank of Pakistan, Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan and the Board;

    (b)derives income from manufacturing activities only.

    (c)has declared taxable income for the last three consecutive tax years.

    (d)has issued dividend for the last five consecutive tax years.

    Proposal

    Since the SECP has notified Regulations for Shariah Compliant Companies, Rule 231H should be deleted.

    Further, Clause 18B be amended as below :The rate of tax as specified in Division ii of Part I of the first Schedule shall be reduced by 2 percent in case of a company whose shares are traded on stock exchange if:

    (a) it fulfils prescribed Shariah compliant criteria approved by Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan.

    (b) derives majority or more than 50 percent income from manufacturing activities.

    Rationale

    SECP being the Regulatory Authority for legislation and promulgation of Companies governance laws in Pakistan, holds the right infrastructure including a Shariah Compliance Department and the expertise to determine and regulate compliance with Shariah governance regulations, 2018.

    Reduced Rate of WHT on Export Proceeds

    At present, rate of tax deduction on export proceeds under section 154 is 1 percent which is same as for five export oriented sectors as well as for other than five sectors.

    Proposal

    In order to promote diversification of exports instead of relying on only five specified sectors, rate of tax on export proceeds should be reduced to 0.5 percent from 1 percent for sectors which are not covered under the five specified export oriented sectors.

    Rationale

    At present, sales tax 0 rating is available to five specified export oriented sectors on their input materials whereas such benefit is not available to other potential export sectors. Moreover, gas supply is also available to five specified sectors @ 600/MMBtu whereas rate of gas per MMBTU for non -conventional sector is Rs. 780 in addition to GIDC, which make potential export uncompetitive and consequently, Pakistan is unable to diversify export markets. In order to compensate such exporters and to promote export of other than five sectors, rate should be decreased to 0.5 percent for such sectors.

    Manufacturing Bond /DTRE rules are cumbersome and in certain cases lack clarity whereby many potential exporters can not avail them. Consequently, it results in LOST EXPORTS.

    Proposal

    Manufacturing bond/ DTRE rules need to be modified to make it easily accessible and lend full clarity to allow exporters to fulfill potential export orders.

    Rationale

    To increase exports by facilitating existing and potential exporters.

  • ACCA suggests making FBR immovable property values in line with fair market value to stop asset undervaluation

    ACCA suggests making FBR immovable property values in line with fair market value to stop asset undervaluation

    KARACHI: Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) Pakistan has urged the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to bring the immovable property values in line with fair market values to discourage under-valued asset declarations.

    (more…)
  • ICAP recommends harmonization of federal, provincial tax laws

    ICAP recommends harmonization of federal, provincial tax laws

    KARACHI: Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan (ICAP) has recommended harmonization of federal and provincial tax laws to facilitate the taxpayers.

    In its budget proposals for fiscal year 2019/2020 the ICAP suggested following measures for harmonization of federal and provincial taxes:

    Integration of Taxation Authorities for One-Window Solution

    The ICAP believes, there should be a strong integration of all revenue authorities in such a way that each authority would maintain its existence but should provide one-window solution for the taxpayer.

    This would be not only for enabling inter-adjustment of refunds, but also for one return for both the Federal and Provincial Taxes.

    In this regard, STRIVE should be implemented at provincial level also along with integration with the Federal return.

    The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) is practically not allowing refunds for Provincial sales tax, owing to settlement disputes / claims pending with the Provincial Tax Authorities.

    Further, unnecessary notices are issued against input tax claims, on account of non-verification of Provincial sales tax in FBR’s system.

    This issue needs to be taken up with the Provincial sales tax authorities for its resolution at the earliest.

    Federal and Provincial Policies – Enforcing Uniformity

    A policy board comprising Chairman of the FBR as well as the Provincial Boards should be formed to ensure uniformity in policies, tax rates and procedures of the Federal and Provincial Revenue Boards. Standard Schedule of services should also be introduced.

    Classification rules play a vital role and are generally crucial in the identification of a correct tariff heading for levying tax.

    The provincial statutes should provide classification of taxable services in a more consistent manner to provide clarity and help reducing unnecessary litigation.

    Sales Tax Rate to be Standardized

    Another key area for correction is different Sales Tax rates prevailing across provinces. For example, standard rate of sales tax in Punjab is 16 percent, which is high as compared to other provinces and, therefore, needs some standardization.

    Standard rate of Sales Tax should be reduced to 13 percent, in line with the SST to attract more taxpayers into the tax net; reduce cost of doing business; and bring equity with other provinces.

    Concept of Reverse Charge under Provincial Sales Tax on Services

    All Provincial Statues provide that service provided by a non-resident service provider is liable to tax under reverse charge mechanism i.e. in the hand of service recipient.

    A nonresident has been defined as a person who is not registered with the relevant provincial statute.

    Concept of reverse charge is used in many countries so that service exporters do not have to get themselves registered in the jurisdiction of the service importer.

    In Pakistan, inter-provincial transactions are not zero-rated, or exempt in the jurisdiction of origin.

    Accordingly, such a tax framework is tantamount to double taxation in case where service provider is located in other province of Pakistan, because the service provider becomes liable to tax in his/her respective Province; while the recipient of service becomes liable to tax in the Province of his/her residence.

    It is suggested that the reverse charge should be restricted to such cases where service provider is located outside Pakistan.

    Further, tax paid under the reverse charge mechanism should be allowed as an input tax.

    Export of Services

    Unlike STA, zero rating of services is not available in other provincial statutes in line with the best international practices.

    In PSTSA, zero rating is allowed on the basis of certain harsh conditionalities; while under SSTSA, such benefit is only extended to Accountants & Auditors and Software Consultants.

    Zero rating on export of all taxable services should be allowed without any conditionalities by all provinces in order to promote export of services in the international market, and to harmonize the service tax laws with the federal tax law; in line with the best international practices.

    Time to claim Input Tax

    Presently, the time to claim input tax credit in all provinces is six months, and that in PRA is four months from the end of the relevant tax period.

    Such period is insufficient and does not cater to business needs.

    It is, therefore, suggested that the time period for claiming input tax credit be consistent across all the Provincial Statutes and be also increased to one year.

    Single Base for Calculating Property Related Taxes

    It is proposed that a single base be defined to calculate all the Provincial and Federal taxes applicable on acquisition and disposal of property.

    This would help in documentation of the untaxed money parked in the real estate sector. Appropriate changes in the Constitution of Pakistan are also desired for the purpose.

    Sales Tax Withholding

    Except for Punjab, all the Provinces require withholding of sales tax for registered / active taxpayers as well. This results in unwarranted administrative and operational issues.

    In this regard, it is suggested that in all the Provinces, sales tax withholding be exempted in cases where service provider is registered. Where a service is provided by an unregistered person to the registered service recipient, the liability to pay the tax practically falls upon the

    person receiving the service in almost all cases.

    The whole amount of sales tax is required to be withheld from the payment made to the unregistered person.

    It is suggested that the rate of withholding tax for unregistered service providers may be reduced to 1 percent; in line with the Federal Sales Tax Rules.

  • Smuggling through ATT biggest threat to economic growth: PBC

    Smuggling through ATT biggest threat to economic growth: PBC

    KARACHI: Pakistan Business Council (PBC) in its budget proposals 2019/2020 has said that smuggling through Afghan Transit Trade is the biggest threat for economic growth of the country.

    “Smuggling through Afghan Transit Trade has always been the biggest threat for economic growth and hardly any sector has been left untouched by this menace,” the council said.

    Smuggled goods through the borders of Afghanistan, Iran, China, India and the Afghan Transit Trade from a chunk of the informal economy, volume of which ranges between 50-60 percent of the formal economy, the PCB said.

    “It is costing the national exchequer in billions. Markets across the country are flooded with smuggled goods and local industries are struggling for survival as smuggled goods are not only easily available everywhere but are also attracting the buyers who prefer foreign merchandise,” it said.

    The PBC suggested that goods moving under Afghan Transit Trade (ATT) from Pakistan to Afghanistan should be charged with duties and taxes under the Pakistani laws and the same should be transferred to Afghan government.

    Secondly, the duties and taxes so paid should be deposited with the State Bank in the US Dollar. Further, a quantitative restriction should be applied on goods moving under ATT on the basis of consumption.

    Giving rationale of the proposal, the PBC said that it would allow industry to fairly compete with unscrupulous imports, government to benefit from increased revenue.

    The PBC also suggested rationalizing import tariff to promote domestic manufacturing.

    The council said that the tariff structure had been distorted due to constant changes in the duty rates, the tariff structure was originally designed to support domestic manufacturing, however, changes in rates of import duties coupled with imposition of regulatory duty had led to situation where the tariff on finished products was less than that on the raw or intermediate goods.

    It said that a detailed tariff exercise with the objective of rationalizing the duty structure to promote domestic manufacturing was underway. Therefore, industry needs to be taken into confident in this matter.

  • Chartered Accountants declare documenting agriculture income must for tax reforms

    Chartered Accountants declare documenting agriculture income must for tax reforms

    KARACHI: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan (ICAP) has said that documentation of agriculture income is must for bringing tax reforms in the country.

    In its budget proposals for year 2019/2020 the ICAP said that there was a serious need of brining taxation of agriculture income under a more transparent and documented manner.

    “Capacity building of Provincial Authorities, in this regard, is required to be undertaken by the federal government,” it said.

    Though taxation of agricultural income may remain with the provinces under the Constitution but there is no bar on federal government in documenting agricultural income, so that the agricultural assets and income earned there from are identified and not used for under reporting and mis-declaration, it added.

    Following are the other proposals of the ICAP for tax reforms:

    Effective Utilization of Available Database

    The basic source for broadening of the existing Tax Base is financial transactions carried out by the persons who avoid filing tax returns.

    All major financial transactions require CNIC number and the FBR should remain in touch with these authorities/offices to collect information.

    The ICAP believes a proper mechanism is central to this issue and needs to be introduced in the law to bring the potential unregistered persons, whose information is already available in the shape of NTN/CNIC, through withholding provisions. Further, all the bank accounts (including existing bank accounts) should mandatorily be tagged with tax registration.

    As such, banks should only open accounts of traders and shopkeepers (including sole proprietors and association of persons) having trade license and / or proper tax registration.

    Additionally, commercial connections of gas and electricity provided to non-filer should also be discontinued.

    With the advent of global tightening on the grey/black portion of the economy as well as rising scrutiny on the untaxed offshore assets, we encourage setting up of separate

    Directorate for International Taxation and Special Unit (Automatic Exchange of Information – AEOI) for dealing with cases arising out of exchange of information.

    However, AEOI requires further strengthening of resources and integration with the local database for broadening of the tax base. All these requirements should appropriately be included and made part of the relevant laws.

    Facilitating / Rewarding Tax Payers to create an incentive culture

    In order to encourage and motivate taxpayers, we suggest some mechanism has to be developed to stop all types of unfair treatment with existing taxpayers e.g. explanation of each and every credit entry in the bank statements.

    In this regard, issuance of a Taxpayer Facilitation Card should help with a preferential treatment given to individual taxpayers paying taxes above a particular threshold in a year (say, tax of Rs 1 Million, or above).

    Filers should also, in letter and spirit, be given priority treatment at various infrastructural facilities e.g., at NADRA, excise and taxation when registering motor vehicles, courts of law, airports etc.

    Final Taxation based on Income Parity

    Presently, certain sectors / goods are being taxed under Presumptive / Value Added / Fixed Tax Schemes. It is proposed that all Presumptive / Value Addition / Fixed Tax Schemes be abolished and, all such sectors / goods may be brought under the uniform tax regime to promote the culture of income-based taxation rather than receipt-based taxation.

    Minimum Tax (MT) and Alternative Corporate Tax

    For rationalization of taxes, simplification as well as overall efficiency, we suggest only one type of Minimum Tax Regime should be applicable on the taxpayer.

    At present, additional MT Regimes in the form of ACT and MT on services are also applicable, which is undue and creates distortions.

    Alternatively, ACT should be made applicable on the companies after two years of date of incorporation or start of commercial production, whichever is later.

    In this regard, Small Companies should be exempt from ACT altogether. In case MT paid due to a tax loss for the year, it is proposed that the taxpayer be made entitled to carried-forward, and therefore should be able to adjust it against the tax liability for five succeeding tax years.

    In our view, applicability of 8 percent MT on services also stands unreasonable. There are already a number of exceptions created for this regime, which is resulting in discrimination.

    Simplification of Withholding Tax Regime

    The chartered accountants believe, for simplification purposes, there should be a minimum number of withholding taxes but with few standard rates for all withholding taxes.

    The differentiation should be on the basis of filer and non-filer only. All withholding taxes collected or deducted should be made available for adjustment.

    They suggest to reduce withholding tax provisions for “filers” while raising the rate of withholding taxes for non-filers at the same time.

    This would help “filers” to utilize resources for business purposes.

    Further, exemption certificates be issued for all sorts of withholding taxes to the filers by receiving advance tax on quarterly / monthly basis.

    Reforms in Sales Tax Filings

    In case of any omission or wrong declaration in the return, a registered person is required to obtain approval from the Commissioner Inland Revenue in order to enable him/her to revise his/her return.

    Previously, this option was provided through SRO 278(I)/2010 dated 28 April 2010, but revoked through SRO 487/2011 dated 3 June 2011 due to potential misuse of this facility by declaring nominal increase in tax liability in revised return.

    However, now owing to STRIVE, the manipulation chances are minimal.

    Further, serious reforms are required in respect of following:

    (i) Claim of input tax within six months, beyond which approvals are unnecessarily required;

    (ii) Refund claim under sections 10 and 68 beyond one year requires unnecessary approvals and condonation with no response time prescribed for Tax Officials;

    (iii) Automated system of applications for condonations under section 74 is required; and

    (iv) Automatic restoration of un-adjusted input tax is required if refund cheque is not issued.

    At present, refund claims result in removal of input tax from the system because of which taxpayer is unable to utilize input tax if refund cheque is not issued in time.

    Appellate Forums

    It is felt that the principles of justice are not met at the first level of appeal i.e. Commissioner-Appeals. In this regard, Commissioner-Appeals should be brought under the administrative control of the Federal Ministry of Law and the Appellate Tribunal under the control of the High Court of the respective jurisdiction.

    All decisions of Commissioner-Appeals and Appellate Tribunal should also be reported for transparency and improvement of confidence of the taxpayer in the taxation system of the country.

    It is also suggested that an officer once appointed as Commissioner-Appeal not be subsequently assigned any functions, powers and responsibilities of an office or authority subordinate to the Federal Board of Revenue.

    Relaxation in Levy of Advance Tax on Import of Raw Materials

    In order to minimize cost of production, we suggest, the Industrial undertakings be allowed to import raw material in the first year of production, without payment of any advance tax.

    For subsequent years, they may be allowed exemption against advance tax under Section 148 on import of raw material, as per actual requirement, instead of 125 percent quantity of the previous year.

    The tax scheme should also be rationalized with the taxation of the commercial importers, if opted for normal tax regime.

    Tax on Surplus of Not-for-Profit Organization

    It is recommended to abolish sub-section (1A) and (1B) of section 100C of the ITO, as it is directly causing hindrance to the welfare activities involving capital expenditure to be incurred over a period exceeding one year. This requires due attention.

    Alternatively, the limit of spending in a year on charitable and welfare activities from receipts during that year currently set at minimum 75 percent of such receipts, may be analyzed over a reasonable period (at least three years), to account for expenditures, which are inevitably spread over a period exceeding one year.

    Execution of Contract by a Non-Resident Supplier

    The Finance Act 2018 brought about certain amendments in the Income Tax laws to tax supply of goods by a non-resident in case of overall arrangements for Engineering, Procurement, Construction and Commissioning (EPCC), even if the supply is made outside of Pakistan.

    The said amendments, in our view, as introduced through the Finance Act 2018, are not consistent with the International Tax Laws. Therefore, it is suggested that the competent authority reconsider such amendments in order to align it with the International Tax Laws.

    Adjustable Input Tax

    Presently, Section 8B restricts the claim of input tax up to 90 percent of the output tax and requires mandatory payment of 10 percent.

    It is suggested that Section 8B may either be removed from the statute or, at least, the mandatory payment of 10 percent be reduced to 5 percent.

    The issue of bogus refund is reduced to certain extent after introduction of STRIVE.

    Capacity Building of Revenue Authorities

    Capacity building is immensely important for the tax-collecting institution to assume and effectively execute larger challenge of documenting the economy.

    In this regard, the FBR should also go for hiring of professional staffs (like CAs, ICMAPs, PIPFAs, etc.) both at Commissioner and operational level having sufficient experience e.g. 2-5 years for the relevant position.

    Documenting the Economy & Revamping the Tax Mechanism

    Though not preferred, but a one-time Amnesty Scheme may be considered for bringing the black money into the tax net.

    Sufficient time should be provided so that people properly understand and make maximum use of the scheme. This may give better results after recent introduction of AEOI and follow-up tax proceedings.

    Rationalization of Further Tax and Extra Tax Regime

    Extra tax at the rate of 2 percent is levied and collected by the manufacturers and importers on certain goods designated as specified goods under Chapter XIII of the Sales Tax Special Procedure Rules, 2007 and, are tabulated in Rule 58S. Subsequent supply of specified goods subject to Extra Tax at the rate of 2 percent is exempt from the payment of sales tax, including those as made by retailers as per Rule 58T(5).

    Accordingly, distributors, wholesalers or retailers of such goods cannot issue any tax invoice to their customers. In this regard, it is suggested that suitable amendments are made in the law to specifically exclude items subject to Extra tax from the ambit of Further Tax.

  • KTBA discusses tax proposals at pre-budget seminar

    KTBA discusses tax proposals at pre-budget seminar

    KARACHI: Karachi Tax Bar Association (KTBA) on Monday organized pre-budget seminar to recommend tax proposals for year 2019/2020.

    Ali A Rahim, Director, Bakertilly Chartered Accountants presented income tax recommendations for the upcoming budget.

    Rahim presented following recommendations:

    Depreciation on Musharika Assets Under Section 22(15)C

    Proposal: The depreciation on Musharika assets to be allowed retrospectively since inception.

    Set off of Losses against income from property Under Section 56

    Proposal: The position prior to amendment made through Finance Act, 2013 should be restored to allow set off against property income as well.

    Restriction on setting off of depreciation losses Under Section 57

    Proposal: The amendment brought through Finance Bill 2018 relating to unabsorbed depreciation and amortization is proposed to be deleted.

    Workers Welfare Fund and Workers Profit Participation Fund Under Section 60A & 60B

    In both the Law it is categorically stated that this shall be allowed if the payment is made to the Federal Government. Since the enactment of the 18th Amendment in 2010, the same is collected by the Provincial Government.

    Since, there is no mention of the payment to the Provincial authorities the same is being disallowed by the Income Tax Authorities.

    Proposal: It is therefore proposed that the payment made under the Provincial Laws may be incorporated in Section 60A and 60B.

    Tax Credit to persons registered under Sales Tax Act, 1990 Under Section 65A

    Tax credit of 2½ was available from tax year 2009 to Manufacturers registered under the Sales Tax, if 90% of the sales were to those persons registered in Sales Tax. In 2016 this was increased to 3%, to encourage persons towards documentation.

    However to reasons best known to the Government, this was deducted vide Finance Act, 2017

    Proposal: It is proposed that this section should be reincorporated in the tax Law.

    Non Recognition Rules Under Section 79(2)

    This section excludes any gain or loss arising from disposal of assets if certain conditions are fulfilled including gift of an assets to a relative.

    However, if the recipient is a non-resident at the time of the acquisition then the said person is not entitle to an exemption which is very unfair as now every family has persons living abroad.

    Proposal: It is therefore proposed that section 79(2) should be deleted.

    Adjustment of Minimum Tax payment in case of Tax Loss Under Section 113(2)(c)

    The following Explanation is proposed to be inserted:

    “Explanation –For the removal of doubt, it is declared that the expression “the excess amount of tax” apply to all cases where no tax is payable for any reason whatsoever including any loss of income, profits or gains or set-off of losses or unabsorbed depreciation of earlier years, exemption from tax and allowances and deductions admissible under any provision of this Ordinance.

    Appointment of the Appellate Tribunal Under Section 130

    Accountant members are posted in the Tribunal from the tax department and can be reposted back in the tax department and hence are very conservative when imparting Justice.

    Proposal: It is proposed that once an officer is posted to the Tribunal, he should then retire from there and should in no way go back to the tax department. This will go a long way in imparting Justice.

    Stay order by Tribunal should be valid till Disposal of its Appeal Under Section 131

    Proposal: It is proposed that the said amendment be deleted and the earlier position of law should be restored in the interest of natural justice so as to provide relief to the taxpayer.

    Tax deduction on Import of Plant and Machinery by Service Sector Under Section 148(7)

    It is proposed to insert the following in the list of exceptions provided under sub-section (7) of section 148:

    Equipment imported by service sector companies for their own use.

    Exemption from Income Tax on Imports to NPOs Under Section 148 SRO 947 of 2008

    It is proposed that such exemption is also extended at least to such non-profit organizations whose income is exempt in terms of Clause (66) of Part I of the Second Schedule.

    Excessive Tax Deduction from Salary Under Section 149

    It is proposed to:

    -replace section 64 with 62A of the Ordinance to allow tax credit on House Loan.

    -insertion of new clause to allow tax adjustment for deductible allowances on account of Zakat, Allowance for payment of Profit House Loan and Education expenses under Sections 60, 60C and 60D, respectively.

    -tax withheld and paid under any other Section of the Ordinance.

    Withholding on Local Royalty Under Section 153

    It is proposed that the separate flat rate of tax withholding is specified if royalty is paid to residents which should fall under Final Tax Regime.

    Deduction of tax Under Section 153

    No withholding in the case of registered persons [Filers]

    It is proposed to amend the Section 153 that the withholding agents should only deduct/collect tax in the cases of Non-Filers or Unregistered Services providers, Suppliers & Contractors.

    Automatic credit of tax deducted Under Section 153

    It is proposed that when the tax is deducted, credit of the same should automatically be given to the withholdee.

    Withholding on Rent in case of Multiple Years Under Section 155

    It is proposed to include an explanation under Section 155 that tax withholding is required on the basis of annual rent paid for a tax year at the applicable rates to each year.

    Time limit for Monitoring of Withholding of Income Tax Under Section 161 & 162

    It is proposed to insert the following provisions under Section 161/162:

    Proceedings for monitoring of withholding taxes should not be initiated for a tax year after expiry of 6 tax years

    Allow ability of Tax Payment as a Credit after Monitoring of Withholding of Taxes. Under Section 161 (1A)

    It is proposed that the withholder should be allowed to deposit the tax in the

    name of the parties whose withholding fell short.

    Bi-Annual Statements to be replaced with Monthly Withholding Statement Under Section 165

    It is proposed that the filing of biannual is replaced with monthly filing of withholding statement.

    Offences and Penalties Under Section 182(1)

    An explain was incorporated explaining “Tax Payable” and it stipulated to mean tax chargeable on the basis of the taxable income.

    The purpose of the penalty is to educate the taxpayers and the same should not be for the purpose of tax generation. In addition taxes deducted/paid, other then payment along with the return, is already with the Government, hence there is no loss of revenue.

    It is therefore proposed that penalty should be on the balance of tax payable along with the return and not the total tax liability.

    Returns Not filed within due date Under Section 182A

    A person filing the returns late by even 1 day will be treated as a non filers for the full year.

    There is already a provision in the Law under section 182 for imposition of penalty for late filers.

    Proposal: Section 182A should be withdrawn and the person filing the return late should also be considered as a filer, after payment of the penalty under section 182.

    Duplication of Advance tax on payment of foreign Education made through Credit Card or Debit Card or Prepaid Card Under Sections 236R & 236Y

    The provisions should be withdrawn in its entirety for filers.

  • ICAP submits tax proposals for ease of doing business

    ICAP submits tax proposals for ease of doing business

    KARACHI: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan (ICAP) has submitted tax proposals for budget 2019/2020 and suggested measures for ease of doing business.

    The ICAP suggested following tax proposals for ease of doing business:

    Facilitating Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)

    The ICAP said that SMEs serve as the backbone of the economy by playing the most vital role of production, employment generation etc. To facilitate their growth and ease of doing business, there is dire need for SME and retailers to have a separate and simplified income tax regime. It is proposed that, with simplified one-page return and minimum possible book-keeping requirement, the taxation regime should encourage SME/retailers for income based taxation.

    “It is proposed to exclude SMEs from the list of withholding tax regime specified within different sections of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Such simplified regime should also be aligned with the sales tax regime.”

    A special regime in the form of Ninth Schedule (as presented by Tax Reform Committee) should be adopted.

    Retailers falling under SRO 1125(I)/2011 dated December 31, 2011 are allowed reduced sales tax rate of six percent, if their sales transactions are integrated with the FBR system. Considering the effectiveness of this system and in order to curtail loss of revenue in other sectors due to under-reporting of revenue, option may be provided to all the retailers to install real-time sales reporting system and those availing such facility should be allowed to charge reduced rate of sales tax.

    Income Tax Credit for sales tax registered person:

    In this regard, Section 65A of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 is proposed to be reinstated with a higher rate of tax credit in order to encourage documentation in the economy and broadening of tax base.

    Moreover, condition of 90 percent supplies to registered persons should be reduced to 75 percent. Further, the restricted benefit of this tax credit to manufacturers should be extended to all persons registered under the Sales Tax Act, 1990.

    Promoting Local Industry, Brand Made in Pakistan for import substitute:

    A long term solution to reduce export-import gap, as also envisaged in the medium term economic framework, import substitution is one of the highest priorities for the government at the moment.

    In this regard, some of the steps proposed here should play a key role: a trade license mechanism should be introduced with a legal onus on the supply chain member to check that the goods are not from illegal or smuggled source.

    Radiography scanning of all inbound and outbound containers should be made mandatory to curb smuggling and plug revenue leakages. Import stage tax incidence on raw material should be reduced enough to provide manufacturers to bear the expense of value addition and local taxes.

    This would discourage import of finished goods, which can be manufactured in Pakistan and thus can reduce country’s reliance on imports, leading to saving of precious foreign exchange.

    Foreign exchange regime needs to be further strengthened to ensure that values are properly declared and taxes at import stage.

    Encourage Domestic and Foreign Investment

    At present, amongst other factors both the new local as well as foreign investors are reluctant to invest in manufacturing industry of Pakistan due to various impediments.

    These include collection of sales tax at 17 percent and income tax at 5.5 percent at import stage on plant and machinery and spare parts.

    In order to promote industrialization in the country, it is suggested that the exemption from tax collection at import stage on import of plant and machinery and spare parts by newly established manufacturing company/for expansion by the existing company should be allowed at least for five years from the date of incorporation of the new company/initiation of expansion projects by the existing company.

    This amendment will encourage new much needed investment in the manufacturing sector of the country without any additional cost / burden on the government’s exchequer as tax collected at import stage is already adjustable/refundable.

    Income Tax Exemption

    The ICAP proposed that restriction in respect of issuance of exemption certificate for new projects/capacity expansion/formula and process changes should be removed.

    Further, under the current law, tax exemption is conditional upon payment of tax on the basis of proceeding two years’ tax liability. The said condition, to meet the tax payment equal to previous tax years, is proposed to be abolished and the same should also be linked with the payment of advance tax liability for the respective period.

  • PBC suggests measures for broadening tax base by enhancing withholding tax rates on non-filers, unregistered persons

    PBC suggests measures for broadening tax base by enhancing withholding tax rates on non-filers, unregistered persons

    KARACHI: Pakistan Business Council (PBC) has suggested measures for broadening tax base through enhancing withholding tax rates on non-filers and unregistered persons in various sectors.

    The PBC – the advisory council of large corporate entities – in its budget proposals for 2019/2020 said that the concept of separate withholding tax rates for filers and non-filers was introduced as a measure for increasing documentation of the economy.

    “Though large amounts are being collected from non-filers, no effort has been made to increase the tax base. The non-filers for the most part have build the cost of this government levy into pricing and passed it on to their customers.”

    The PBC said that in order to broaden the tax base and to achieve increase in overall tax collection without burdening existing taxpayers, the policy to increase tax on non-filers / unregistered persons should be implemented specifically in the following cases:

    a. unregistered industrial / commercial entities (not having STRN) having bill amount in excess of Rs20,000 per month, extra sales tax should be increased from five percent to 20 percent.

    b. After collection of extra tax for a continuous period of six months, all these connections should be provisionally converted into NTN and STRN and return filing from these connections should be enforced.

    c. In case of provisional registration, utility companies should be directed to issue show cause notices where annual billing amount exceeds Rs2.4 million and directing provisionally registered persons to obtain permanent registration. In case of non-compliance, utility companies should be directed to disconnect utility connections.

    d. Moreover, in order to bring all commercial/industrial users in the tax net and to verify filer status, electric distribution companies should provide one year to all such consumers to get their NTN registered with electricity distribution companies. In case of failure to provide NTN, electricity connection should be disconnected. Considering the fact that all industrial/commercial connections will be linked with NTN, the tax department will then be in a better position to assess the electricity consumed by commercial/industrial users and corroborate the same with amount of sales/ production etc. reported in sales tax/income tax return.

    e. In order to bring all commercial/industrial users in the tax net and to verify filer status, electric distribution companies should provide one year to all such consumers to get their NTN registered with them. Thereafter, such commercial / industrial consumers without NTN should be charged advance income tax at 30 percent (from existing 12 percent) on their utility bills. Those with NTN but non-filer status should be charged at 20 percent withholding tax.

    f. Residential consumers should be made liable to provide NTN in case of electricity bill amount exceeds Rs1.2 million per year or levy advance income tax withholding of 20 percent.

    g. All exemption (like exemption on agriculture income) under the income tax law should only be made available to filers so that exempt income is also reported and wealth is reconciled.

    h. withholding tax on international business class tickets under Section 236L is same Rs16,000 for filer and non-filer, it should be increased to Rs50,000 for non-filers.

    i. Withholding tax at five percent or Rs20,000, whichever is higher, is applicable under Section 236D on all functions organized by filers as well as non-filers. Rate of withholding should be increased for non-filers to Rs100,000 as minimum and no withholding tax from filer.

    j. Function halls withholding tax on electric bills should be 30 percent which can be adjusted against tax liability by providing proof of tax deducted from their customers.

    k. Withholding income tax on interest income under section 151 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 is 10 percent for filer and 17.5 percent for non-filer. Rate should be increased to 30 percent for non-filers.

    l. Annual private motor vehicles tax under section 234 of the ordinance for non-filers is Rs15,000 for 1600 cc-1999cc and Rs30,000 for 2000cc and above. Rate for non-filers should be increased to Rs50,000 for 1600cc – 1999cc and Rs200,000 for 2000cc and above.

    m. Advance income tax is collected on sales of immovable property under Section 236, which is 2 percent for non-filers, should be increased for non-filers to 10 percent for properties of 900 square yards or more.

    n. Purchase of land (above specified limit) is only allowed by filers, however, holding of land and its sale by non-filers is still allowed. Holding of land by non-filers should be made more expensive by asking those authorities collecting property tax (cantonment boards/ societies/ registrars) to collect adjustable advance income tax, form non-filers, on behalf of the federal government as: Rs500,000 per year for 800 yards or more but less than 1800 yards; Rs1 million per year for 1800 yards and above.

  • PSX proposes reducing withholding tax to 2.5pc on income from margin financing transactions

    PSX proposes reducing withholding tax to 2.5pc on income from margin financing transactions

    KARACHI: Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) has recommended the tax authorities to reduce the withholding tax to 2.5 percent from 10 percent to develop the market and increase tax collection.

    In its budget proposals for 2019/2020, the stock market said that the proposed reduction in the rate of tax on margin financing transactions would help develop market and increase tax collection by Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) because 10 years back the size of similar market for margin transactions was several time higher.

    The PSX said that margin financing facility is made available to all members against net ready market purchases of their clients and proprietary positions.

    The National Clearing Company of Pakistan Limited (NCCPL) provides a system to margin financing participants for recording and settlement of margin financing transactions, with financing terms and conditions pre-determined by the margin financee and margin financier.

    Margin financing facility is made available only in eligible securities notified by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP).

    The PSX said that the present tax rate on gross income of the financier is 10 percent without deduction of any expenditure to earn such income.

    In most cases the funds are borrowed from financial institutions for such margin financing transactions, it added.

    The cost involved in margin financing includes financing cost payable to financial institution, trading, clearing and depository charges and other administrative cost which render that the amount deducted as advance tax could not be fully adjusted against the tax liability of most brokers leading towards claims for tax refunds that are not time bound.

    For the purpose of reducing withholding tax, the PSX proposed amendment to Division IIB of Part IV, First Schedule to Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 as: “The rate of deduction under section 233A shall be 2.5 percent of profit or mark-up or interest earned by the member, margin financier or securities lender.”

  • Commercial importers destroying domestic industry: PBC

    Commercial importers destroying domestic industry: PBC

    KARACHI: Pakistan Business Council (PBC) – the advisory forum of large corporate entities – has said that commercial importers are involved in massive under-invoicing and they are destroying the domestic industry.

    In its budget proposals for 2019/2020, the PBC recommended measures for documentation of economy to providing level playing field for domestic manufacturing.

    The PBC said that across the board massive under-invoicing and dumping of imported products had been increasing. “Information regarding values at which various customs check post clear import consignment is not publicly available. This encourages unscrupulous importers to under-declare the value of consignments to evade government revenues,” it added.

    It also pointed out that there are massive leakages in Afghan Transit Trade (ATT) and smuggled goods are being openly sold in all major shopping centers of the country. “Customs however is not willing to act against smuggled products citing lack of cooperation from local authorities,” it added.

    The PBC recommended:

    a. values at which import shipments are cleared through PRAL or CARE need to be publicly available.

    b. The government of Pakistan must insist of Electronic Data Interface (EDI), initially for both Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and non-FTA from China. “In future the requirement of EDI should be made compulsory for imports from FTA/ PTA partner countries.

    c. Depending on industry, the import trade price (ITP) should be fixed e.g. on the basis of country of origin, weight, volume etc. after discussion with stakeholders. “ITP’s may be fixed for most items prone to mis-declaration such as consumer goods and margins of commercial importers should be monitored to assess the value of subsequent supply of imported goods. A certificate to this effect should be issued by auditors of commercial importers.”

    d. For items, prone to under invoicing and mis-declaration, Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) should designate one or two ports (including the dry ports) for clearing of import consignments. “This will allow better monitoring of the import consignments where chances of mis-declaration are on a higher side.”

    e. Additionally, the old Customs General Order 25 should be revived with a provision that local manufacturer should be given the option to buy at a 15 percent premium, any consignment which appears undervalued.

    f. Taxes and duties deposited local manufacturers and commercial importers should be published.

    g. The rate of tax collected from commercial importers should be maintained at their current level. Presently, tax collected from commercial importers is treated as final tax. The income tax collected at import stage should be treated as advance tax.

    h. Commercial importers should be required to file returns under the normal tax regime as introduced through the Finance Act, 2018.

    i. In order to allow commercial importers to claim adjustment of tax deducted at import stage, commercial importers should be asked to present certificate from auditors that at least 70 percent of imported items have been exported or soled to registered manufacturers. “This will also help increase the overall tax base,” the PBC said.

    j. Monthly sales declared by commercial importers should be matched with sales declared in annual income tax returns as well as the credit entries in all business bank accounts. “In case of any discrepancy, a reconciliation with justifiable reason should be submitted by the commercial importers.

    k. Online CREST system must be amended in a way to trace sales along with value addition thereon of person to whom supplies were made by commercial importers.