Tag: Federal Board of Revenue

The Federal Board of Revenue is Pakistan’s apex tax agency, overseeing tax collection and policies. Pakistan Revenue is committed to providing timely updates on the Federal Board of Revenue to its readers.

  • FBR to promote IRS, PCS officers from BS-18 to BS-19

    FBR to promote IRS, PCS officers from BS-18 to BS-19

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) on Tuesday announced that it will promote officers of Inland Revenue Service (IRS) and Pakistan Customs Service (PCS) from BS-18 to BS-19.

    In an office memorandum, the FBR said that the meeting of Departmental Selection Board (DSB) for promotion from BS-18 to BS-19 is being convened shortly.

    Therefore, the FBR directed all BS-18 officers of IRS/PCS and ex-cadre, who are in promotion zone to get their performance evaluation report (PERs) completed up to June 30, 2019 by March 25, 2020.

    The FBR also directed concerned reporting/countersigning officers to forward the PERs pending with them to the board immediately.

  • Tax collection from profit on banking deposits jumps up by 185%

    Tax collection from profit on banking deposits jumps up by 185%

    KARACHI: The collection of withholding tax from profit on banking deposits surged by 185 percent during first eight months (July – February) 2019/2020 owing to higher interest rates maintained by the central bank.

    The withholding tax collection from profit on debt (banking deposits) increased to Rs43.75 billion during first eight months of current fiscal year as compared with Rs15.32 billion in the same period of the last fiscal year.

    The sources in Regional Tax Office (RTO)-II, Karachi, a revenue collecting arm of the FBR said that that due to prevailing high rate ofinterest attracted bank deposits.

    The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) has keptpolicy rate unchanged at 13.25 percent. The policy rate was gradually increasing since August 2018 when the rate was 7.5 percent.

    The sources explained that under Section 151(1)(b) withholding tax is collected on profit on debt paid by banking companies or financial institutions on account or deposit maintained.

    Every banking company is required to collect 10 percent of the gross yield/profit paid up to Rs500,000 or 15 percent of the gross yield / profit paid exceeding amount Rs500,000 at the time the profit on debt is credited to the account of the recipient or is actually paid, whichever is earlier.

    The sources said that it is mandatory for the banks to collect double the amount of withholding tax from those persons receiving profit on debt but not on the Active Taxpayers List (ATL).

    The government through Finance Act, 2019 introduced 10th Schedule to the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 to enhance the rate of withholding tax by 100 percent on certain transactions.

    The measure has been taken to force persons making large transactions and paying withholding tax on such transactions but remained outside the tax net.

    The sources said that after the implementation of the 10th Schedule the pace of return filing for Tax Year 2018 increased in order to avoid paying 100 percent higher rate of withholding tax.

  • FBR allows tier-1 retailers to integrate POSs by March 30

    FBR allows tier-1 retailers to integrate POSs by March 30

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has allowed big retailers to integrate their point of sale (POS) with FBR’s online system by March 31, 2020 in order to avoid legal action.

    The FBR on Monday extended the date of online integration of Tier-1 retailers.

    The FBR said that it had condoned the time limit as provided in Sales Tax Rules, 2006 up to March 31, 2020, for online integration of tier-1 retailers’ POSs with board’s computerized system for real-time reporting of sales.

    However, this permission is subject to condition that the teir-1 retailers should furnish in writing their willingness to integrated all their POSs in terms of the rules to respective Regional Tax Offices (RTOs)/Large Taxpayers Units (LTUs) by March 15, 2020.

    Previously, the deadline was expired on December 15, 2019 which was given by the FBR to tier-1 retailers to integrate their POSs with the FBR online system.

    All tier-1 retailers are required to integrate all their POSs with FBR’s computerized system.

    Tier-1 retailer is defined in section 2(43A) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, to be a person who falls in any of the following categories:

    (a) a retailer operating as a unit of a national or international chain of stores;

    (b) a retailer operating in an air-conditioned shopping mall, plaza or centre, excluding kiosks;

    (c) a retailer whose cumulative electricity bill during the immediately preceding twelve consecutive months exceeds Rupees twelve hundred thousand;

    (d) a wholesaler-cum-retailer, engaged in bulk import and supply of consumer goods on wholesale basis to the retailers as well as on retail basis to the general body of the consumers”; and

    (e) a retailer, whose shop measures one thousand square feet in area or more.

  • Tax collection from property purchase falls amid FBR action against black money

    Tax collection from property purchase falls amid FBR action against black money

    KARACHI: The collection of withholding tax on purchase of immovable properties fell by 12 percent owing to fall in prices after slowdown in economy and enforcement of legal provisions by Federal Board of Revenue (FBR).

    Sources in local tax office in Karachi said that the collection of the tax office fell to Rs390 million during first eight months (July-February) of current fiscal year as compared with Rs443 million in the same period of the last fiscal year.

    The sources said that slowdown in economy had restrained people from purchasing or transfer immovable properties. Further the enforcing legal provision related to curb black money also prevented investment in the real estate business, they added.

    The sources said besides these issues the ongoing hearing related to illegal constructions in Karachi city at the level of Supreme Court of Pakistan also impacted the purchase of immovable properties.

    They said that the decline in collection of withholding income tax was also due to deteriorating in open market prices due to fear of action against black money.

    It is reported that the real estate business in Pakistan is one of the biggest avenue for the black money.

    The withholding tax on purchase of immovable property is one percent of the declared value on the basis of FBR valuation table. However, the tax rate is two percent if the buyer is not on the active taxpayers list (ATL).

    However, changes in the law enable the tax authorities to examine the declared value by a purchaser and on non-satisfaction the tax authorities may assess the property on fair market value.

    The sources said that the real estate business was also afraid as tax authorities had started obtaining information from bank regarding payment for the purchase of immovable properties.

    Besides, the tax authorities are also obtaining information of buyers of immovable properties from provincial property registrars on real-time basis.

    The sources said that the tax machinery was finalized strategy to take harsh action against black money invested in real estate business in the wake of significant shortfall in revenue collection.

  • All members of AOP responsible to pay tax default

    All members of AOP responsible to pay tax default

    KARACHI: Any tax payable by an Association of Persons (AOP) was not recovered in such case every person of the AOP shall be jointly and severally responsible for payment of the tax due.

    Officials of Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) said that through Finance Act, 2019 the amendment made to Section 139 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 to make responsible every person of an AOP for default payment.

    The Section 139 says:

    Section 139: Collection of tax in the case of private companies and associations of persons

    (1) Notwithstanding anything in the Companies Ordinance, 1984 (XLVII of 1984), where any tax payable by a private company (including a private company that has been wound up or gone into liquidation) in respect of any tax year cannot be recovered from the company, every person who was, at any time in that tax year —

    (a) a director of the company, other than an employed director; or

    (b) a shareholder in the company owning not less than ten per cent of the paid-up capital of the company, shall be jointly and severally liable for payment of the tax due by the company.

    (2) Any director who pays tax under sub-section (1) shall be entitled to recover the tax paid from the company or a share of the tax from any other director.

    (3) A shareholder who pays tax under sub-section (1) shall be entitled to recover the tax paid from the company or from any other shareholder to whom clause (b) of sub-section (1) applies in proportion to the shares owned by that other shareholder.

    (4) Notwithstanding anything in any law, where any tax payable by a member of an association of persons in respect of the member’s share of the income of the association in respect of any tax year cannot be recovered from the member, the association shall be liable for the tax due by the member.

    (5) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law, for the time being in force, where any tax payable by an association of persons in respect of any tax year cannot be recovered from the association of persons, every person who was, at any time in that year, a member of the association of persons, shall be jointly and severally liable for payment of the tax due by the association of persons.

    (6) Any member who pays tax under sub-section (5) shall be entitled to recover the tax paid from the association of persons or a share of the tax from any other member.

    (7) The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to any amount due under this section as if it were tax due under an assessment order.

  • Immovable property purchase made mandatory through banking channel

    Immovable property purchase made mandatory through banking channel

    KARACHI: Tax authorities have said that payment for purchase of immovable properties above Rs5 million is mandatory to be paid through banking channel. (more…)

  • FBR may invoke provisions for third party recovery

    FBR may invoke provisions for third party recovery

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) may invoke provisions related to third party recovery of tax defaulted by a taxpayer.

    FBR sources said that the tax authorities may invoke Section 140 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 in order to make recovery from a defaulter.

    The FBR recently notified draft rules through SRO 111(I)/2020 dated February 14, 2020 to implement Section 140 of the Ordinance.

    As per the draft rules the tax authorities would be empowered to recover tax from a defaulter through third party, who owes money to the defaulted taxpayer.

    The sources said that the FBR soon issue the notification to make draft rules to part of the statute.

    The FBR is facing huge revenue shortfall for achieving this revenue collection target. Therefore, the tax machinery may apply all possible ways to recovery outstanding amount.

    The Section 140 explains the procedure of recovery through third party.

    Section 140: Recovery of tax from persons holding money on behalf of a taxpayer

    Sub-Section (1): For the purpose of recovering any tax due by a taxpayer, the Commissioner may, by notice, in writing, require any person –

    (a) owing or who may owe money to the taxpayer; or

    (b) holding or who may hold money for, or on account of the taxpayer;

    (c) holding or who may hold money on account of some other person for payment to the taxpayer; or

    (d) having authority of some other person to pay money to the taxpayer, to pay to the Commissioner so much of the money as set out in the notice by the date set out in the notice:

    “Provided that the Commissioner shall not issue notice under this sub-section for recovery of any tax due from a taxpayer if the said taxpayer has filed an appeal under section 127 in respect of the order under which the tax sought to be recovered has become payable and the appeal has not been decided by the Commissioner (Appeals), subject to the condition that ten per cent of the said amount of tax due has been paid by the taxpayer.”

    Sub-Section (2): Subject to sub-section (3), the amount set out in a notice under sub-section (1) —

    (a) where the amount of the money is equal to or less than the amount of tax due by the taxpayer, shall not exceed the amount of the money; or

    (b) in any other case, shall be so much of the money as is sufficient to pay the amount of tax due by the taxpayer.

    Sub-Section (3): Where a person is liable to make a series of payments (such as salary) to a taxpayer, a notice under sub-section (1) may specify an amount to be paid out of each payment until the amount of tax due by the taxpayer has been paid.

    Sub-Section (4): The date for payment specified in a notice under sub-section (1) shall not be a date before the money becomes payable to the taxpayer or held on the taxpayer’s behalf.

    Sub-Section (5): The provisions of sections 160, 161, 162 and 163, so far as may be, shall apply to an amount due under this section as if the amount were required to be deducted from a payment under Division III of Part V of this Chapter.

    Sub-Section (6): Any person who has paid any amount in compliance with a notice under sub-section (1) shall be treated as having paid such amount under the authority of the taxpayer and the receipt of the Commissioner constitutes a good and sufficient discharge of the liability of such person to the taxpayer to the extent of the amount referred to in such receipt.

    Sub-Section (10): In this section, “person” includes any Court, Tribunal or any other authority.

  • FBR issues values of minerals for tax collection

    FBR issues values of minerals for tax collection

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has notified values of minerals for collection of advance tax at the time of extracted, produced, dispatched and carried away from the licensed or leased areas of the mines.

    The FBR issued SRO140(I)/2020 dated March 02, 2020 for notifying values of minerals to collect advance tax at the rate of five percent. The tax is applicable only on those persons not on the active taxpayers list (ATL).

    The FBR inserted Rule 231I for values of minerals for the purpose of sub-section 4 of section 236 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001:

    The values are:

    S.No.Name of mineralRate per metric tonne (in Rupee)
    (1)(2)(3)
    01Argilacoeous clay500
    02Asbestos4875
    03Antimony11700
    04Agglomerate6500
    05Barite6500
    06Basalt9100
    07Bentonite3900
    08Bauxite4550
    09Bajri780
    10Brine/salt570
    11Barytes875
    12Ball clay875
    13Coal5000
    14Clay1625
    15China Clay625
    16Calcite1300
    17Celestite1625
    18Conglomerate1950
    19Chromite18750
    20Chalk2500
    21Dolomite2250
    22Diorite6500
    23Flourite10400
    24Fullers Earth1300
    25Fire Clay1300
    26Gypsum1950
    27Granite13000
    28Gabro stone9750
    29Granodiorite9750
    30Gravel750
    31Iron ore5200
    32Limestone (for manufactures of cement)4500
    33Limestone (other than cement factory)1500
    34Laterite815
    35Lake salt875
    36Marble onyx16250
    37Magnesite3900
    38Marble (other than onyx)3900
    39Manganese5200
    40Ochre/ red ochre3900
    41Ordinary stone910
    42Pumice1950
    43Quartz3900
    44Quardzite3250
    45Rock salt875
    46Silica sand4500
    47Sulphur3900
    48Soap stone5250
    49Serpentine3250
    50Shale (cement industry)2500
    51Sand650
    52Shale750
    53Slate Stone1875
    54Sandstone750
    55Tar sand490
    56Tufff1625

    The FBR said that advance tax shall be collected by the provincial authority or a person authorized by the provincial authority to collect or recover royalty on minerals excavated and transported from leased area.

    The FBR further said that where a person having authority to collect or recover royalty on behalf of the provincial authority:

    (a) fails to collect tax as required; or

    (b) having collected tax fails to pay the tax to commissioner as required under Section 160

    the person having authority to collect of recover royalty as well as provincial authority shall be jointly and severally liable to pay the amount of tax to the commissioner who may pass an order to that effect and proceed to recover the same.

  • People can file their returns after due date for appearance in ATL: FBR

    People can file their returns after due date for appearance in ATL: FBR

    KARACHI: People can still file their annual income tax returns after due date for appearing on the Active Taxpayers List (ATL) after paying default surcharge.

    The last date for filing income tax returns for tax year 2019 was February 28, 2020 and FBR issued ATL – 2019 of March 01, 2020. With the issuance of new ATL the ATL-2018 was no more applicable. Thus, those persons filed income tax returns for tax year 2018 and availing reduced rate of withholding tax rates on the basis of ATL 2018.

    However, those persons filed their returns for tax year 2019 will avail the reduced rate of withholding tax rates and their names appeared on the ATL 2019 till the next ATL issued on March 01, 2021.

    The FBR issued a clarification on the news items relating to actual number of tax returns filed in Tax Year 2019 and Tax Year 2018 published in the newspapers. FBR has clarified that number of tax returns filed in Tax Year 2018 till 28th February 2019 were 16,95,560 whereas the number of tax returns filed in Tax Year 2019 till 28th February, 2020 were 24,72,609 which showed an increase of 45 % compared to corresponding month in the last Tax Year.

    FBR has further stated that date for filing tax returns were extended in Tax Year 2018 and the last date for filing tax returns was set as 9th August, 2019. The news items depicted the comparison of tax returns filed till the last date of Tax Year 2018 with last date of Tax Year 2019 which gave the perception that the actual tax returns filed in Tax Year 2019 have decreased compared to Tax Year 2018.

    FBR has further added that the total period from the last date of Tax Year 2018 till last date of Tax Year 2019 consists of almost six months. This period of six months for Tax Year 2019 is comparably very short with that of Tax Year 2018. The number of Tax Returns 24,72,609 filed in six months for Tax Year 2019 shows great achievement of FBR.

    The people continue to file tax returns to come on Active Taxpayers List even after last date but the returns can only be filed by paying surcharge after the set last date.

  • FBR launched crackdown against 300,000 non-filers

    FBR launched crackdown against 300,000 non-filers

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has launched crackdown action against around 300,000 non-filers of annual returns for tax year 2019.

    The tax authorities have started sending notices to individuals and companies who filed their returns and declaration of assets for tax year 2018 but failed to comply this obligation in the subsequent year.

    The FBR issued Active Taxpayers List (ATL) on March 01, 2020 for tax year on the basis of return filed up to February 29, 2020.

    The ATL revealed that around 2.53 million individuals/companies filed annual returns for tax year 2019. Meanwhile, the estimated return filing for tax year 2018 was increased to record high of over 2.83 million, showing a gap of around 300,000 returns.

    However, the return filing has increased by 60 percent when compared with 1.6 million returns filed till February 28, 2019.

    Under Section 114 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, the FBR explained the mandatory requirement of return filing on certain classes of individuals and companies.

    As per the law every company registered with Securities and Exchange Commission (SECP) is required to file returns. But in contrast the FBR received around 40,988 corporate returns for tax year 2019.

    On the other hand the SECP had registered around 100,000 companies till June 30, 2019. This shows that around 59 percent corporate entities had failed to comply with mandatory requirement.

    A statement issued by the FBR on February 29 revealed that it had received 2.34 million returns from salary and business individuals. While another 62,403 returns were filed by Association of Persons (AOPs).

    Tax officials said that the tax authorities had started issuing notices giving opportunity to non-filers to ensure compliance along with payment of late filing.

    The sources said that the action had been initiated after expiry of due date for filing tax returns, which was February 28, 2020.

    In case persons/company deliberately default then penal provisions may be invoked.

    According to tax ordinance, in case a person fails to file return of income by due date than such person is required to pay a penalty equal to 0.1 percent of the tax payable in respect of that tax year for each day of default subject to a maximum penalty of 50 percent of the tax payable provided that if the penalty worked out as aforesaid is less than forty thousand rupees or no tax is payable for that tax year such person shall pay a penalty of forty thousand rupees.

    In case a person deliberately not comply with the notice for filing return then such person would be liable to fine or imprisonment for one year.