Tag: ICAP

  • ICAP recommends harmonization of federal, provincial tax laws

    ICAP recommends harmonization of federal, provincial tax laws

    KARACHI: Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan (ICAP) has recommended harmonization of federal and provincial tax laws to facilitate the taxpayers.

    In its budget proposals for fiscal year 2019/2020 the ICAP suggested following measures for harmonization of federal and provincial taxes:

    Integration of Taxation Authorities for One-Window Solution

    The ICAP believes, there should be a strong integration of all revenue authorities in such a way that each authority would maintain its existence but should provide one-window solution for the taxpayer.

    This would be not only for enabling inter-adjustment of refunds, but also for one return for both the Federal and Provincial Taxes.

    In this regard, STRIVE should be implemented at provincial level also along with integration with the Federal return.

    The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) is practically not allowing refunds for Provincial sales tax, owing to settlement disputes / claims pending with the Provincial Tax Authorities.

    Further, unnecessary notices are issued against input tax claims, on account of non-verification of Provincial sales tax in FBR’s system.

    This issue needs to be taken up with the Provincial sales tax authorities for its resolution at the earliest.

    Federal and Provincial Policies – Enforcing Uniformity

    A policy board comprising Chairman of the FBR as well as the Provincial Boards should be formed to ensure uniformity in policies, tax rates and procedures of the Federal and Provincial Revenue Boards. Standard Schedule of services should also be introduced.

    Classification rules play a vital role and are generally crucial in the identification of a correct tariff heading for levying tax.

    The provincial statutes should provide classification of taxable services in a more consistent manner to provide clarity and help reducing unnecessary litigation.

    Sales Tax Rate to be Standardized

    Another key area for correction is different Sales Tax rates prevailing across provinces. For example, standard rate of sales tax in Punjab is 16 percent, which is high as compared to other provinces and, therefore, needs some standardization.

    Standard rate of Sales Tax should be reduced to 13 percent, in line with the SST to attract more taxpayers into the tax net; reduce cost of doing business; and bring equity with other provinces.

    Concept of Reverse Charge under Provincial Sales Tax on Services

    All Provincial Statues provide that service provided by a non-resident service provider is liable to tax under reverse charge mechanism i.e. in the hand of service recipient.

    A nonresident has been defined as a person who is not registered with the relevant provincial statute.

    Concept of reverse charge is used in many countries so that service exporters do not have to get themselves registered in the jurisdiction of the service importer.

    In Pakistan, inter-provincial transactions are not zero-rated, or exempt in the jurisdiction of origin.

    Accordingly, such a tax framework is tantamount to double taxation in case where service provider is located in other province of Pakistan, because the service provider becomes liable to tax in his/her respective Province; while the recipient of service becomes liable to tax in the Province of his/her residence.

    It is suggested that the reverse charge should be restricted to such cases where service provider is located outside Pakistan.

    Further, tax paid under the reverse charge mechanism should be allowed as an input tax.

    Export of Services

    Unlike STA, zero rating of services is not available in other provincial statutes in line with the best international practices.

    In PSTSA, zero rating is allowed on the basis of certain harsh conditionalities; while under SSTSA, such benefit is only extended to Accountants & Auditors and Software Consultants.

    Zero rating on export of all taxable services should be allowed without any conditionalities by all provinces in order to promote export of services in the international market, and to harmonize the service tax laws with the federal tax law; in line with the best international practices.

    Time to claim Input Tax

    Presently, the time to claim input tax credit in all provinces is six months, and that in PRA is four months from the end of the relevant tax period.

    Such period is insufficient and does not cater to business needs.

    It is, therefore, suggested that the time period for claiming input tax credit be consistent across all the Provincial Statutes and be also increased to one year.

    Single Base for Calculating Property Related Taxes

    It is proposed that a single base be defined to calculate all the Provincial and Federal taxes applicable on acquisition and disposal of property.

    This would help in documentation of the untaxed money parked in the real estate sector. Appropriate changes in the Constitution of Pakistan are also desired for the purpose.

    Sales Tax Withholding

    Except for Punjab, all the Provinces require withholding of sales tax for registered / active taxpayers as well. This results in unwarranted administrative and operational issues.

    In this regard, it is suggested that in all the Provinces, sales tax withholding be exempted in cases where service provider is registered. Where a service is provided by an unregistered person to the registered service recipient, the liability to pay the tax practically falls upon the

    person receiving the service in almost all cases.

    The whole amount of sales tax is required to be withheld from the payment made to the unregistered person.

    It is suggested that the rate of withholding tax for unregistered service providers may be reduced to 1 percent; in line with the Federal Sales Tax Rules.

  • Chartered Accountants declare documenting agriculture income must for tax reforms

    Chartered Accountants declare documenting agriculture income must for tax reforms

    KARACHI: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan (ICAP) has said that documentation of agriculture income is must for bringing tax reforms in the country.

    In its budget proposals for year 2019/2020 the ICAP said that there was a serious need of brining taxation of agriculture income under a more transparent and documented manner.

    “Capacity building of Provincial Authorities, in this regard, is required to be undertaken by the federal government,” it said.

    Though taxation of agricultural income may remain with the provinces under the Constitution but there is no bar on federal government in documenting agricultural income, so that the agricultural assets and income earned there from are identified and not used for under reporting and mis-declaration, it added.

    Following are the other proposals of the ICAP for tax reforms:

    Effective Utilization of Available Database

    The basic source for broadening of the existing Tax Base is financial transactions carried out by the persons who avoid filing tax returns.

    All major financial transactions require CNIC number and the FBR should remain in touch with these authorities/offices to collect information.

    The ICAP believes a proper mechanism is central to this issue and needs to be introduced in the law to bring the potential unregistered persons, whose information is already available in the shape of NTN/CNIC, through withholding provisions. Further, all the bank accounts (including existing bank accounts) should mandatorily be tagged with tax registration.

    As such, banks should only open accounts of traders and shopkeepers (including sole proprietors and association of persons) having trade license and / or proper tax registration.

    Additionally, commercial connections of gas and electricity provided to non-filer should also be discontinued.

    With the advent of global tightening on the grey/black portion of the economy as well as rising scrutiny on the untaxed offshore assets, we encourage setting up of separate

    Directorate for International Taxation and Special Unit (Automatic Exchange of Information – AEOI) for dealing with cases arising out of exchange of information.

    However, AEOI requires further strengthening of resources and integration with the local database for broadening of the tax base. All these requirements should appropriately be included and made part of the relevant laws.

    Facilitating / Rewarding Tax Payers to create an incentive culture

    In order to encourage and motivate taxpayers, we suggest some mechanism has to be developed to stop all types of unfair treatment with existing taxpayers e.g. explanation of each and every credit entry in the bank statements.

    In this regard, issuance of a Taxpayer Facilitation Card should help with a preferential treatment given to individual taxpayers paying taxes above a particular threshold in a year (say, tax of Rs 1 Million, or above).

    Filers should also, in letter and spirit, be given priority treatment at various infrastructural facilities e.g., at NADRA, excise and taxation when registering motor vehicles, courts of law, airports etc.

    Final Taxation based on Income Parity

    Presently, certain sectors / goods are being taxed under Presumptive / Value Added / Fixed Tax Schemes. It is proposed that all Presumptive / Value Addition / Fixed Tax Schemes be abolished and, all such sectors / goods may be brought under the uniform tax regime to promote the culture of income-based taxation rather than receipt-based taxation.

    Minimum Tax (MT) and Alternative Corporate Tax

    For rationalization of taxes, simplification as well as overall efficiency, we suggest only one type of Minimum Tax Regime should be applicable on the taxpayer.

    At present, additional MT Regimes in the form of ACT and MT on services are also applicable, which is undue and creates distortions.

    Alternatively, ACT should be made applicable on the companies after two years of date of incorporation or start of commercial production, whichever is later.

    In this regard, Small Companies should be exempt from ACT altogether. In case MT paid due to a tax loss for the year, it is proposed that the taxpayer be made entitled to carried-forward, and therefore should be able to adjust it against the tax liability for five succeeding tax years.

    In our view, applicability of 8 percent MT on services also stands unreasonable. There are already a number of exceptions created for this regime, which is resulting in discrimination.

    Simplification of Withholding Tax Regime

    The chartered accountants believe, for simplification purposes, there should be a minimum number of withholding taxes but with few standard rates for all withholding taxes.

    The differentiation should be on the basis of filer and non-filer only. All withholding taxes collected or deducted should be made available for adjustment.

    They suggest to reduce withholding tax provisions for “filers” while raising the rate of withholding taxes for non-filers at the same time.

    This would help “filers” to utilize resources for business purposes.

    Further, exemption certificates be issued for all sorts of withholding taxes to the filers by receiving advance tax on quarterly / monthly basis.

    Reforms in Sales Tax Filings

    In case of any omission or wrong declaration in the return, a registered person is required to obtain approval from the Commissioner Inland Revenue in order to enable him/her to revise his/her return.

    Previously, this option was provided through SRO 278(I)/2010 dated 28 April 2010, but revoked through SRO 487/2011 dated 3 June 2011 due to potential misuse of this facility by declaring nominal increase in tax liability in revised return.

    However, now owing to STRIVE, the manipulation chances are minimal.

    Further, serious reforms are required in respect of following:

    (i) Claim of input tax within six months, beyond which approvals are unnecessarily required;

    (ii) Refund claim under sections 10 and 68 beyond one year requires unnecessary approvals and condonation with no response time prescribed for Tax Officials;

    (iii) Automated system of applications for condonations under section 74 is required; and

    (iv) Automatic restoration of un-adjusted input tax is required if refund cheque is not issued.

    At present, refund claims result in removal of input tax from the system because of which taxpayer is unable to utilize input tax if refund cheque is not issued in time.

    Appellate Forums

    It is felt that the principles of justice are not met at the first level of appeal i.e. Commissioner-Appeals. In this regard, Commissioner-Appeals should be brought under the administrative control of the Federal Ministry of Law and the Appellate Tribunal under the control of the High Court of the respective jurisdiction.

    All decisions of Commissioner-Appeals and Appellate Tribunal should also be reported for transparency and improvement of confidence of the taxpayer in the taxation system of the country.

    It is also suggested that an officer once appointed as Commissioner-Appeal not be subsequently assigned any functions, powers and responsibilities of an office or authority subordinate to the Federal Board of Revenue.

    Relaxation in Levy of Advance Tax on Import of Raw Materials

    In order to minimize cost of production, we suggest, the Industrial undertakings be allowed to import raw material in the first year of production, without payment of any advance tax.

    For subsequent years, they may be allowed exemption against advance tax under Section 148 on import of raw material, as per actual requirement, instead of 125 percent quantity of the previous year.

    The tax scheme should also be rationalized with the taxation of the commercial importers, if opted for normal tax regime.

    Tax on Surplus of Not-for-Profit Organization

    It is recommended to abolish sub-section (1A) and (1B) of section 100C of the ITO, as it is directly causing hindrance to the welfare activities involving capital expenditure to be incurred over a period exceeding one year. This requires due attention.

    Alternatively, the limit of spending in a year on charitable and welfare activities from receipts during that year currently set at minimum 75 percent of such receipts, may be analyzed over a reasonable period (at least three years), to account for expenditures, which are inevitably spread over a period exceeding one year.

    Execution of Contract by a Non-Resident Supplier

    The Finance Act 2018 brought about certain amendments in the Income Tax laws to tax supply of goods by a non-resident in case of overall arrangements for Engineering, Procurement, Construction and Commissioning (EPCC), even if the supply is made outside of Pakistan.

    The said amendments, in our view, as introduced through the Finance Act 2018, are not consistent with the International Tax Laws. Therefore, it is suggested that the competent authority reconsider such amendments in order to align it with the International Tax Laws.

    Adjustable Input Tax

    Presently, Section 8B restricts the claim of input tax up to 90 percent of the output tax and requires mandatory payment of 10 percent.

    It is suggested that Section 8B may either be removed from the statute or, at least, the mandatory payment of 10 percent be reduced to 5 percent.

    The issue of bogus refund is reduced to certain extent after introduction of STRIVE.

    Capacity Building of Revenue Authorities

    Capacity building is immensely important for the tax-collecting institution to assume and effectively execute larger challenge of documenting the economy.

    In this regard, the FBR should also go for hiring of professional staffs (like CAs, ICMAPs, PIPFAs, etc.) both at Commissioner and operational level having sufficient experience e.g. 2-5 years for the relevant position.

    Documenting the Economy & Revamping the Tax Mechanism

    Though not preferred, but a one-time Amnesty Scheme may be considered for bringing the black money into the tax net.

    Sufficient time should be provided so that people properly understand and make maximum use of the scheme. This may give better results after recent introduction of AEOI and follow-up tax proceedings.

    Rationalization of Further Tax and Extra Tax Regime

    Extra tax at the rate of 2 percent is levied and collected by the manufacturers and importers on certain goods designated as specified goods under Chapter XIII of the Sales Tax Special Procedure Rules, 2007 and, are tabulated in Rule 58S. Subsequent supply of specified goods subject to Extra Tax at the rate of 2 percent is exempt from the payment of sales tax, including those as made by retailers as per Rule 58T(5).

    Accordingly, distributors, wholesalers or retailers of such goods cannot issue any tax invoice to their customers. In this regard, it is suggested that suitable amendments are made in the law to specifically exclude items subject to Extra tax from the ambit of Further Tax.

  • ICAP submits tax proposals for ease of doing business

    ICAP submits tax proposals for ease of doing business

    KARACHI: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan (ICAP) has submitted tax proposals for budget 2019/2020 and suggested measures for ease of doing business.

    The ICAP suggested following tax proposals for ease of doing business:

    Facilitating Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)

    The ICAP said that SMEs serve as the backbone of the economy by playing the most vital role of production, employment generation etc. To facilitate their growth and ease of doing business, there is dire need for SME and retailers to have a separate and simplified income tax regime. It is proposed that, with simplified one-page return and minimum possible book-keeping requirement, the taxation regime should encourage SME/retailers for income based taxation.

    “It is proposed to exclude SMEs from the list of withholding tax regime specified within different sections of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Such simplified regime should also be aligned with the sales tax regime.”

    A special regime in the form of Ninth Schedule (as presented by Tax Reform Committee) should be adopted.

    Retailers falling under SRO 1125(I)/2011 dated December 31, 2011 are allowed reduced sales tax rate of six percent, if their sales transactions are integrated with the FBR system. Considering the effectiveness of this system and in order to curtail loss of revenue in other sectors due to under-reporting of revenue, option may be provided to all the retailers to install real-time sales reporting system and those availing such facility should be allowed to charge reduced rate of sales tax.

    Income Tax Credit for sales tax registered person:

    In this regard, Section 65A of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 is proposed to be reinstated with a higher rate of tax credit in order to encourage documentation in the economy and broadening of tax base.

    Moreover, condition of 90 percent supplies to registered persons should be reduced to 75 percent. Further, the restricted benefit of this tax credit to manufacturers should be extended to all persons registered under the Sales Tax Act, 1990.

    Promoting Local Industry, Brand Made in Pakistan for import substitute:

    A long term solution to reduce export-import gap, as also envisaged in the medium term economic framework, import substitution is one of the highest priorities for the government at the moment.

    In this regard, some of the steps proposed here should play a key role: a trade license mechanism should be introduced with a legal onus on the supply chain member to check that the goods are not from illegal or smuggled source.

    Radiography scanning of all inbound and outbound containers should be made mandatory to curb smuggling and plug revenue leakages. Import stage tax incidence on raw material should be reduced enough to provide manufacturers to bear the expense of value addition and local taxes.

    This would discourage import of finished goods, which can be manufactured in Pakistan and thus can reduce country’s reliance on imports, leading to saving of precious foreign exchange.

    Foreign exchange regime needs to be further strengthened to ensure that values are properly declared and taxes at import stage.

    Encourage Domestic and Foreign Investment

    At present, amongst other factors both the new local as well as foreign investors are reluctant to invest in manufacturing industry of Pakistan due to various impediments.

    These include collection of sales tax at 17 percent and income tax at 5.5 percent at import stage on plant and machinery and spare parts.

    In order to promote industrialization in the country, it is suggested that the exemption from tax collection at import stage on import of plant and machinery and spare parts by newly established manufacturing company/for expansion by the existing company should be allowed at least for five years from the date of incorporation of the new company/initiation of expansion projects by the existing company.

    This amendment will encourage new much needed investment in the manufacturing sector of the country without any additional cost / burden on the government’s exchequer as tax collected at import stage is already adjustable/refundable.

    Income Tax Exemption

    The ICAP proposed that restriction in respect of issuance of exemption certificate for new projects/capacity expansion/formula and process changes should be removed.

    Further, under the current law, tax exemption is conditional upon payment of tax on the basis of proceeding two years’ tax liability. The said condition, to meet the tax payment equal to previous tax years, is proposed to be abolished and the same should also be linked with the payment of advance tax liability for the respective period.