Tag: regulatory duty

  • FBR abolishes regulatory duty on wheat import

    FBR abolishes regulatory duty on wheat import

    ISALAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) on Tuesday abolished regulatory duty on import of wheat in order to bring down domestic price of the commodity.

    The FBR issued SRO 633(I)/2020 in order to amend SRO 6809I)/2019 dated June 28, 2019.

    Through the SRO the FBR reduced the regulatory duty to zero from 60 percent.

    FBR sources said that the decision to abolish the regulatory duty was take to encourage import of the commodity in order to ensure buffer stock at home and maintain retail price at lower side.

  • ECC decides to abolish regulatory duty on smuggling prone items

    ECC decides to abolish regulatory duty on smuggling prone items

    ISLAMABAD – The Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) of the Cabinet has approved the abolition of regulatory duty on several items prone to smuggling, in a move aimed at discouraging illegal trade and enhancing legal imports.

    (more…)
  • FBR allows Rs9.4 billion regulatory duty exemption on vehicle import

    FBR allows Rs9.4 billion regulatory duty exemption on vehicle import

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has allowed exemption from regulatory duty to the tune of Rs9.4 billion on import of vehicles during outgoing fiscal year.

    According to official documents, the revenue body granted exemption from regulatory duty under SRO 640(I)/2018 and SRO 1265(I)/2018 on import of vehicles by new entrants.

    The FBR allowed regulatory duty exemption of Rs6.46 billion under SRO 1265(I)/2018. The FBR issued details of the exemption of regulatory duty under this SRO granted under Para 2 of SRO for import under SRO678-2004, Fifth Schedule, Chapter 99, SRO 492-2009, 565-2006, import of vehicles by new entrants.

    Another amount of Rs2.93 billion granted as exemption from regulatory duty under SRO 640(I)/2018. Giving description, the FBR said that exemption of RD was given under Para 2 of the SRO for imports under SRO 678-2004, Fifth Schedule, Chapter-99, SRO 492-2009, 565-2006, import of Vehicles by new entrants, etc.  

  • Regulatory duty must be rationalized to curb smuggling: Karachi Chamber

    Regulatory duty must be rationalized to curb smuggling: Karachi Chamber

    KARACHI: Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KCCI) has urged tax authorities to rationalize the regulatory duty on imported goods in order to curb smuggling.

    In its proposals for budget 2020/2021, the KCCI said that the regulatory duty was imposed in last fiscal year to rectify the balance of payment crisis.

    To some extent the regulatory duty on imported food items supported the food items produced locally but most of those items which are not produced locally due to climate and resources, have to be imported.

    High rates of RD on imported food items has sharply increased cost of import and consequently these items have been pushed into smuggling regime.

    “Rampant smuggling of these items is taking place with impunity making it impossible to import through documented channels.”

    The KCCI  Major loss of revenue to exchequer because smuggling mafia makes everything available without paying any taxes and duties.

    Imposition of regulatory duty is the main cause that such commonly used items like dry-fruits, nutrition, honey, grains, pulses and spices are being imported through illegal channels which is causing significant damage to the economy of the country.

    The KCCI suggested that regulatory duties should be rationalized and in some cases withdrawn to curtail smuggling and help to increase in revenues, documentation of trade and support the exports as many of the imported items are industrial raw materials which are re-exported to generate foreign exchange for Pakistan.

  • FBR urged to reduce regulatory duty on lighting fittings

    FBR urged to reduce regulatory duty on lighting fittings

    KARACHI: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has been urged to reduce regulatory duty on lighting fittings in alignment with LED bulbs and LED tubes.

    The Overseas Investors Chamber of Commerce and Industry (OICCI) in its proposals for budget 2020/2021 submitted to the FBR, stated that current regulatory duty on lighting fittings with fixed / fitted LED under HS code 9405.1030 and 9405.4020 is 30% whereas on LED bulbs (HS code 8539.5010) and LED tubes (HS code 8539.5020) the same is 2 percent.

    Therefore, it is recommended that regulatory duty should be reduced on Lighting fittings with fixed / fitted LED under HS code 9405.1030 and 9405.4020 in alignment with LED bulbs and LED tubes.

    Consequent to amendments in law relating to IOCO arrangements, sales tax (including duties) is exempt under fifth schedule of Customs Act under serial no 23 on all type of housing i.e. ‘’Housing/Shell, shell cover and base cap for all kinds of LED Lights and Bulbs under respective headings.

    Accordingly, sales tax should have been exempt on said product under sixth schedule of STA 1990. However, this is not the case as related amendment in sixth schedule of STA 1990 was not made.

    To align with amendment in fifth schedule of Customs Act under serial no 23, consequent amendment be made in serial no. 15A of sixth Schedule of STA 1990 for description of goods for HS code 9405.1090 be changed from Aluminum Housing /shell for LED (LED Light Fixture) to Housing/Shell, shell cover and base cap for all kinds of LED Lights and Bulbs as.

    The OICCI said that through Finance Supplementary (Amendment) Act October 2018, Energy Saving Tubes under HS code 8539.3120 are exempted from sales tax (including duties) under serial no. 22 (xiii) of fifth Schedule of Customs Act 1969. However, related amendments are not made in table 3, serial no. 15 of sixth Schedule of STA 1990.

    To align with amendment in fifth schedule of Customs Act under serial no 22 (xiii), consequent amendment be made in serial no. 15 in table 3 of sixth Schedule of STA 1990 by addition of HS code 8539.3120.

    Taxation of Export of Services and Execution of Contracts outside Pakistan: As per Clause (3) of Part II of second schedule of ITO, the rate of tax has been increased from 1 percent to 3.5 percent and 4 percent on account of execution of contract outside Pakistan and export of services respectively. This significant increase in Finance Act 2016 has adversely affected the export business of companies.

    The rate of tax needs to be reverted back to 1 percent.

  • FBR proposed to review regulatory duty regime to promote domestic industry

    FBR proposed to review regulatory duty regime to promote domestic industry

    KARACHI: Business community has urged the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to review existing regulatory duty regime in order to promote domestic industry.

    Pakistan Business Council (PBC) in its budget proposals 2020/2021 advised the FBR to review of the regulatory duty where domestic industry can expand and market its capacity to the export markets.

    The PBC supports the government’s resolve to simplify, reduce and introduce cascading tariffs to promote industry.

    However, at a time of global recession when many overseas producers will be looking to find markets, we urge the government to factor this into its tariff review to protect jobs in Pakistan.

    Unless there is very strong anomaly, we recommend that present tariffs be maintained in order to preserve scale and competitiveness of domestic industry.

    Moreover, the DTRE scheme should be simplified for SMEs to avail.

    The PBC strongly advocates that the Finance Bill 2020 has a bias in favor of the manufacturing sector as a recovery in the manufacturing sector will have a multiplier effect of the economy.

    The PBC continues to advocate that taxation needs to be based on the principle of “all income irrespective of source should be taxed & all taxpayers must file tax returns”.

    The PBC and its members also firmly believe that the fiscal space that the government is looking for to implement its ambitious socio-economic agenda will not, and cannot be provided by continuing to increase taxation on the already taxed sectors of the economy.

    The taxation base needs to be widened through better documentation by bringing the under taxed, and the currently exempt sectors in the tax net.

    The current tax policies are leading to a reduction in investable surpluses for the corporate sector. The short-term revenue enhancement measures pursued by FBR in the recent past have acted as a disincentive to not only re-investments by existing units but have also acted as a deterrent to fresh investments in industry and the formal sector.

    Last year, the PBC welcomed the government’s policy announcement to separate tax policy and tax administration, it is however disappointed with the pace of implementation of this decision and urges the government to move on this front to create taxpayer confidence in the tax machinery.

    The laws on Group Taxation & Group Relief and the Alternate Corporate Tax (ACT) need to be addressed to create an investor friendly environment in the country.

    The arbitrary & non-transparent implementation of tax laws by FBR functionaries in their zeal to achieve unrealistic revenue targets is severely impacting the viability of the formal sector.

    The continued failure of the FBR to use data-mining to identify those who are either not paying or underpaying their dues is also an area of concern for the formal sector.

    There is blatant misuse of the Afghan Transit Trade continues, wholesale and retail markets all over Pakistan are flooded with smuggled products, however despite having the jurisdiction to act against the open sale of smuggled products, the FBR continues to hide behind such flimsy excuses like “lack of support from local administration.”

    The revenue leakages in the Customs department need to be plugged, Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) with China needs to be fully implemented.

    The Afghan Transit Trade needs to be better monitored, one measure could be the collection of all dues which are payable by importers in Pakistan and refunding the same once the shipment has conclusively entered Afghanistan.

    The PBC appreciates that the government managing the economy under an IMF program and at the same time managing the expectations of a nation reeling under the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic does not have the fiscal space to provide major incentives, however, it also believes that it is the government itself which through its policies can create the space that it requires to implement its social agenda.

  • FBR collects Rs71.21 billion as regulatory duty in last fiscal year

    FBR collects Rs71.21 billion as regulatory duty in last fiscal year

    KARACHI: The customs authorities have collected Rs71.21 billion as regulatory duty during fiscal year 2018/2019, said Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) in a report released recently.

    The collection of regulatory duty increased by 12 percent to Rs71.21 billion in fiscal year 2018/2019 as compared with Rs63.58 billion in the preceding fiscal year.

    The share of regulatory duty in total customs collection in fiscal year 2018/2019 was 10.36 percent. This ratio was at 10.45 percent to the total customs duty in fiscal year 2017/2018.

    The total collection of customs duty was Rs685.57 billion in fiscal year 2018/2019 as compared with Rs608.37 billion in the preceding fiscal year, showing increase of 12.7 percent.

    The collection of customs duty also includes warehouse surcharge, regulatory duty, export development surcharge and export duties.

    The customs authorities collected Rs1.06 billion as warehouse surcharge in fiscal year 2018/2019 as compared with Rs853 million.

    An amount of Rs7.69 billion as export development surcharge during fiscal year 2018/2019 as compared with Rs6.13 billion in the preceding fiscal year.

    Besides, the authorities also collected Rs816 million as export duties during fiscal year 2018/2019 as compared with Rs859 million in the fiscal year 2017/2018.

  • FBR withdraws 40% regulatory duty on sugar import

    FBR withdraws 40% regulatory duty on sugar import

    ISLAMABAD: The government has withdrawn 40 percent regulatory duty on import of sugar and sugar products.

    The FBR issued SRO 127(I)/2020 dated February 24, 2020 to withdraw the regulatory duty of 40 percent on import of commodities falling under Customs Harmonized Code Chapter of 17.01.

    The government imposed 40 percent regulatory duty on import of sugar through SRO 680(I)/2019.

    However, through the latest SRO 127(I)/2020 the regulatory duty has been withdrawn.

    It is worth mentioning that the recently the retail prices in the local markets surged abnormally. Some quarters had suggested the government to import the commodity to meeting the local demand and discourage hoarding.

    However, the Economic Coordination Committee in its latest meeting had rejected the proposal to import sugar as sufficient quantity was available in the country.

    Industry sources said that importers would able to import sugar from international market without levy of regulatory duty.

  • Regulatory duty on wheat import withdrawn; SRO issued

    Regulatory duty on wheat import withdrawn; SRO issued

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) on Thursday issued notification to withdraw regulatory duty on import of wheat and other wheat products.

    The Revenue Division issued SRO 119(I)/2020 dated February 19, 2020 to amend SRO 680(I)/2019 to withdraw regulatory duty on import of wheat.

    The government imposed 60 percent regulatory duty on import of wheat, which has been withdrawn through the latest SRO.

  • Cabinet approves gradual reduction in regulatory duty

    Cabinet approves gradual reduction in regulatory duty

    ISLAMABAD: The Federal Cabinet has approved gradual reduction in regulatory duty and additional customs duty under first-ever National Tariff Policy (NTP).

    The federal cabinet, in its meeting chaired by the Prime Minister held on Tuesday November 19, 2019, approved the first-ever National Tariff Policy (NTP).

    The policy guidelines contained in the NTP, as approved by the Cabinet, provide that the tariff slabs will be simplified based on the principle of cascading; tariffs on raw materials, intermediate and capital goods will be gradually reduced; the additional customs duty and regulatory duties will be gradually reduced; the difference in the rates of tariff for the commercial importers and industrial users of raw materials, intermediate and capital goods will be eliminated to provide a level-playing field to the SMEs through competitive access to essential raw materials; the nascent industry will be provided time-bound protection, which will cover the payback period.

    The policy, developed by the commerce division after extensive consultations with the stakeholders, marks a milestone in the national economic policy paradigm by recognizing the importance of employing import tariffs for industrial development and export growth.

    The prime minister, in his remarks during the cabinet meeting, said that the import tariffs have been traditionally employed as a revenue generation tool, which has increased reliance on import tariffs for revenue collection. In accordance with the reform agenda of the government, the economic policy paradigm is now being realigned to leverage tariffs for industrial development.

    The National Tariff Policy aims at removing the anomalies in the tariff structure and making it a reflection of trade policy priorities and enhancement of competitiveness through duty-free access to imported raw materials and promotion of investment into efficient industries through a predictable tariff structure, decided through an institutional mechanism.

    The NTP is based on the principles of (i) employing tariffs as an instrument of trade policy rather than revenue generation, (ii) maintaining vertical consistency through cascading tariff structures (increasing tariff with stages of processing of a product), (iii) providing time-bound ‘strategic protection’ to the domestic industry during the infancy phase, and (iv) promoting competitive import substitution through time-bound protection, which will be phased out to make the industry eventually competitive for export-oriented production.

    The policy will be implemented through a Tariff Policy Board (TPB) chaired by the Commerce Minister/Advisor, with Minister for Industries & Production, Secretary Finance, Secretary Revenue, Chairman FBR, Secretary Commerce, Secretary Board of Investment, and Chairman NTC as its members.

    A Tariff Policy Centre shall be created in the Ministry of Commerce, which will serve as the Secretariat of the TPB.

    Abdul Razak Dawood, Commerce Advisor, stated that the NTP marks a watershed in the country’s economic policy making since it would energize export growth, lead to rapid industrialization, and import substitution through predictability in tariff framework.