Tag: withholding tax

  • No service charges allowed for collecting withholding tax

    No service charges allowed for collecting withholding tax

    KARACHI: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has not allowed deduction of service charges by withholding agents for collecting/deducing withholding tax on behalf of the federal tax authority.

    According to an official document, under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 the withholding agents are not entitled to receive any service charges for collection or deduction of tax as a withholding agent.

    However, it has been noticed that certain withholding agents including provincial governments and other autonomous organizations are claiming service charges for acting as withholding agents.

    In order to expressly disallow such claims, new sub-section (6) and (7) have been inserted in section 168 which provides that notwithstanding anything contained in any other law or any rules, for the time being in force, no amount is to be deducted on account of service charges from the tax withheld or collected by any person under the provisions of this Ordinance.

    As provided in sub-section (7) in case any amount is deducted on account of service charges by the person, the said person will be liable to pay this amount to the Federal Government and all the provisions of the Ordinance shall apply in so far as they apply to the recovery of tax.

  • IR officers to get information of importers through online customs system

    IR officers to get information of importers through online customs system

    KARACHI: The officers of Inland Revenue to access online system of customs clearance for monitoring of withholding tax collected from importers.

    The sources in Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) said that the Collectors of Customs of Sea Ports/Dry Ports are obliged to collect withholding tax on imports as per prescribed rates.

    In the case of goods/equipments imported through Airways, each Collector is obliged to collect tax at the time of clearance. Statements are to be filed on monthly basis.

    Tax under this section is collected from all, except from the imports by Government or exempt entities on the basis of certificate issued by a Commissioner.

    The sources said that Large Taxpayers Units (LTUs) and Regional Tax Offices (RTOs) have access to WeBOC – the online customs clearance system – for accessing the documents filed by importers for determination of withholding tax at import stage.

    According to official documents for monitoring of withholding taxes, said that the authorized officer of each RTO should coordinate with Customs authorities, hold macro analysis of imports by Government, by other agencies, those treated exempt, and perform the system audit of imports, if required.

    The exemptions allowed to the imports made by exempt entities, the cases where Commissioner issued exemption certificates or SRO based exemptions were allowed; need to be examined to ascertain their admissibility.

    Categorization of imports, as provided in the online system should be strictly enforced by the Customs authorities. Concerned RTO should coordinate the matter accordingly.

    A centralized web based system has been introduced for issuance of certificates by the Commissioners and creation of a centralized Database.

    On-line verification of certificates by the concerned authorities will form part of it. This is necessary for ascertaining the genuineness of exemption certificates.
    PRAL should send the data received from NBP/Customs House to each RTO on daily basis.

    Tax collected as per Customs data and tax actually deposited in NBP and reported through CAP should be reconciled by PRAL on monthly basis with the RTO as part of normal exercise for reconciliation of revenue. Discrepancies should be reported to concerned Collector/ PRAL for reconciliation.

    A comprehensive scheme of allotting tax numbers is in place. All importers should essentially have a Tax Registration Number that is either NTN or Free Tax Number (FTN) and no import should be allowed without a valid tax number.

  • Salary tax potential much higher than existing collection: FBR

    Salary tax potential much higher than existing collection: FBR

    KARACHI: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has said that income tax from salary is an important source of revenue the world over. The real potential is much higher than the present collection, according to an official document.

    Monitoring of withholding tax on salaries is a regular feature. Nevertheless, there is scope for further improvement in view of great potential for payment of considerable perquisites, generally undisclosed.

    All payments made to the employees have tax implications. Strong and well coordinated communication with the employers is needed for promoting greater compliance in a supportive mode with a friendly interface between FBR and the stakeholders.

    The Commissioner can advise to look into the following aspects through systems of large employers like Pakistan Steel, PIA, ICI , CAA& Banks etc :-

    — Comprehensive review of the statements, filed by the Employers;

    — Sector-wise salary surveys regarding trends of pay and allowances in different sectors;

    — Salary structure analysis of major employers;

    — Random selection of cases of senior executives of various corporate sectors including banking, oil and telecom, receiving huge salaries and perquisites, while devising monitoring plan of an organization;

    — Payments in the following heads should be reviewed along with relevant documents for ensuring proper deduction:

    — CBA agreement.

    — Appointment letter / contract (job letter).

    — Contribution to Provident Fund/Annuity.

    — Re-imbursement of medical, petrol, and entertainment.

    — Cars provided by the employers and expenditure on their acquisition and maintenance and Concessional loan facility provided by the company.

    — House accommodation – furnished/unfurnished.

    — Club bills / Hotel bills/Club subscriptions.

    — Utility bills of employees paid by the employer.

    — Free household items like Air-Conditioner, Fridge and furniture items provided.

    — Concessional travelling/Leave Fair Assistance.

    — Stock options offered and connected arrangements for payments and deduction of tax.

    — Formula of deduction of tax and mechanism for recording thereof in the books of accounts and deposit of tax.

    — Receipts of Capital nature which fall under the head “salary”.

    — Compensation for redundancy or loss of employment and golden handshake payments.

    — Scholarships/ tuition fee of children paid by the employer.

    — Liabilities accounted for by the employer especially when new executives are hired, who owe liability to the ex-employer.

    — Concessional mark-up/free loans provided, especially, in the cases of banks and financial institutions.

    — Provision of services of Mali, Chowkidar, security system, driver and cook etc. or re-imbursement of pay of servants.

    — Provision of free electricity, gas, telephone, travel and other products by the employers who deal in such business.

    — Commission and rewards including sales targets achievements and other rewards.

    — Services hired from abroad.

    — Cash medical assistance/hospitalization paid to the employees.

    — Any other allowance or perquisite provided by the employer paid in cash or in any other manner.

    — Salary payments chargeable to Withholding Tax under section 149 of the Ordinance as shown in the Annual Statements should match with the amount of expenses under this head, charged to manufacturing and P&L Account/Audited Statement of Accounts. In case of any difference, the Withholding Tax Agent may be asked to reconcile and explain the reasons for not withholding such tax.

    — Meal and entertainment claimed as business expenditure that may actually be personal, non-deductible.

    — In closely held companies and family owned enterprises, unreasonable compensation to Directors and employees should be checked with reference to work done and contribution made.

    — In the cases of Banks, actual deduction of tax from payment of salary to Branch staff and its deposit should be confirmed with reference to the separate challan for each such deposit. Payments of taxes deducted under various Sections through combined challan always create confusion. It should be ensured that each type of payment is duly supported by the relevant tax deposit challan. Misuse of one challan for various deposits is reported and should be adequately checked.

    The Department should conduct System audit of Mega corporations / large companies in public and private sectors and should be replicated / shared in other cases on national basis.

    It may be re-emphasized that non-cash perquisites are usually not declared in the statements. It is imperative to study terms and conditions of service provided in the service contracts/appointment letters.

    Non-deduction of tax on such perquisites is a common practice observed in many cases for which cognizance, as per law, has to be taken.

  • Income of corporate executives, directors needs aggressive monitoring

    Income of corporate executives, directors needs aggressive monitoring

    KARACHI: The field offices of Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) have been advised to focus on aggressive monitoring on corporate executives / directors with income above certain levels.

    “Their [executives/directors] tax accounts are usually kept separate and not shared with even ordinary management,” according to an official document related to withholding taxes said.

    “Enforcement should be ramped up in their cases for detecting the avoidance.”

    Some sort of trigger management should also be exercised to select such cases with higher probability of producing additional revenue.

    It said that there are certain businesses which are involved in high cash transactions.

    “Cash withdrawals from banks could be one lead along with un-documented receivables or payables.”

    Their reporting in the statements may not be complete. Details of vendors/suppliers are not provided either.

    Such cases should be included in the risk for monitoring. Poor record keepers placing low priority on improving the documentation should be on priority of monitoring.

    Basically, monitoring of withholding taxes is analysis of filed Statements and enforcement from non-filers.

    Formal selection of case for monitoring of Withholding Taxes may not be required.

    Yet, there are numerous aspects that can be considered for initiating the monitoring work.

    The following factors are important in this regard:-

    1. Incomplete or sloppy Statements;

    2. Habitual non-filers/short filers;

    3. Missing part of the Statements (where tax was not deducted);

    4. Incorrect Statements/mathematical errors;

    5. Exempt cases like Non-residents etc;

    6. Matching of information from various documents/ sources;

    7. Discrepancies in Income Tax; Sales Tax Statements and Returns;

    8. Statistical analysis for policy formulation and Sectoral studies;

    9. Un-desirable activities like continuous under reporting etc;

    10. Monitoring on the basis of case studies and research works;

    11. Statistical information collected to update the data sources;

    12. Selection on random basis either electronically or manually;

    13. Discrepancy in Withholding Taxes Statements and Annual Statements of Accounts;

    14. Monitoring consequential to special enquiries, reports and judgments, etc;

    15. Selection of specific cases e.g. large taxpayers and or other revenue potential Withholding Taxes Agents likely to yield substantial revenue for the government;

    16. Risk based analysis of statements and other economic information;

    17. Issue based monitoring;

    18. Any other method or selection as decided by the concerned Commissioner in the individual cases or by the Board about specific classes.

  • Educational institutions share information of persons paying annual fee above Rs200,000

    Educational institutions share information of persons paying annual fee above Rs200,000

    KARACHI: Educational institutions have provided details of persons paying over Rs200,000 annual fee to Federal Board of Revenue (FBR).

    Sources in the FBR said that the educational institutions had provided the details of persons paying annual fee of above Rs200,000 along with the withholding tax statement for the period July – December 2019.

    They said that the educational institutions are required to provide details of persons paying fees including their names, address, CNIC and amount tax withheld.

    The sources said that being withholding agents the educational institutions are required to file withholding statements biannually. The withholding statement for the period July – December 2019/2020 was due on January 31, 2020.

    The educational institutions are required to withholding tax under Section 236I of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.

    Section 236I: Collection of advance tax by educational institutions.

    (1) There shall be collected advance tax at the rate specified in Division XVI of Part-IV of the First Schedule i.e. five percent on the amount of fee paid to an educational institution.

    (2) The person preparing fee voucher or challan shall charge advance tax under sub-section (1) in the manner the fee is charged.

    (3) Advance tax under this section shall not be collected from a person on an amount which is paid by way of scholarship or where annual fee does not exceed two hundred thousand rupees.

    (4) The term “fee” includes, tuition fee and all charges received by the educational institution, by whatever name called, excluding the amount which is refundable.

    (5) Tax collected under this section shall be adjustable against the tax liability of either of the parents or guardian making payment of the fee.

    (6) Advance tax under this section shall not be collected from a person who is a non-resident and,—

    (i) furnishes copy of passport as an evidence to the educational institution that during previous tax year, his stay in Pakistan was less than one hundred eighty-three days;

    (ii) furnishes a certificate that he has no Pakistan-source income; and

    (iii) the fee is remitted directly from abroad through normal banking channels to the bank account of the educational institution.”

  • FBR directs education institutions to provide details of persons paying annual fee above Rs200,000

    FBR directs education institutions to provide details of persons paying annual fee above Rs200,000

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has directed educational institutions to provide details of persons paying annual fee above Rs200,000 in next three days.

    Sources in FBR said that educational institutions including schools, colleges, universities, tuition centers, technical institutions etc. had been asked to provide details of parents or individuals paying annual fee above Rs200,000 by January 31, 2020.

    The educational institutions have been directed to provide complete details of persons paying fees, which should include, name, address, CNIC amount of fee and tax deducted/withheld for the tax year 2020.

    The sources said that the educational institutions would provide the details along with their biannual withholding statement due on January 31, 2020.

    They said that under Section 236I of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 educational institutions are required to collect withholding tax at five percent on gross amount of fee from person paying fee.

    The section read as:

    “236I. Collection of advance tax by educational institutions.— (1) There shall be collected advance tax at the rate specified in Division XVI of Part-IV of the First Schedule on the amount of fee paid to an educational institution.

    (2) The person preparing fee voucher or challan shall charge advance tax under sub-section (1) in the manner the fee is charged.

    (3) Advance tax under this section shall not be collected from a person on an amount which is paid by way of scholarship or where annual fee does not exceed two hundred thousand rupees.

    (4) The term ‘fee’ includes, tuition fee and all charges received by the educational institution, by whatever name called, excluding the amount which is refundable.

    (5) Tax collected under this section shall be adjustable against the tax liability of either of the parents or guardian making payment of the fee.

    (6) Advance tax under this section shall not be collected from a person who is a non-resident and,—

    (i) furnishes copy of passport as an evidence to the educational institution that during previous tax year, his stay in Pakistan was less than one hundred eighty-three days;

    (ii) furnishes a certificate that he has no Pakistan-source income; and

    (iii) the fee is remitted directly from abroad through normal banking channels to the bank account of the educational institution.”

    The rate of collection of tax under section 236I shall be 5 percent of the amount of fee.

  • Court restriction on telecom tax costs Rs55 billion: FBR

    Court restriction on telecom tax costs Rs55 billion: FBR

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has incurred loss of Rs55 billion due to restriction imposed by Supreme Court of Pakistan on collection of tax on phone services.

    The FBR in its year book 2018-2019, said that during the last fiscal year it had missed the revenue collection target by Rs321.5 billion due to various reasons.

    The FBR said that a loss of Rs55 billion was incurred due to suspension of withholding tax on telecommunication services by the Supreme Court of Pakistan.

    The other reasons for revenue shortfall included: petroleum Rs96 billion; reduced government spending Rs80 billion; import compression Rs16 billion, reduced rates of salary income Rs50 billion and reduction in customs duty Rs50 billion.

    The FBR collected Rs. 3,828.5 billion during FY 2018-2019 against Rs. 3,843.8 billion during FY 2017-2018 indicating a negative growth of 0.4 percent.

    The revised revenue target of Rs. 4,150 billion has been achieved to the extent of 92.3 percent.

    The direct taxes, sales tax, FED and customs missed their respective targets by 12.9 percent, 2.1 percent, 10.5 percent and 6.7 percent, respectively.

    During FY 2018-2019 the overall growth in net tax collection has been declined by 0.4 percent.

    The collection of FED grew by around 11.6 percent and customs by 12.7 percent during FY 2018-2019, whereas the sales tax and direct taxes recorded a negative growth of 1.8 percent and 5.9 percent respectively.

    As per the collection FY 2018-2019 the sales tax is the top revenue generator with 38.1 percent share followed by direct taxes with 37.8 percent, customs 17.9 percent and FED 6.2 percent.

    During FY 2018-2019 the share of customs duty and FED has increased, whereas the share of direct taxes and sales tax has decreased slightly.

    The FBR said that the overall growth in collection remained dismal during FY 2018-2019. The overall collection witnessed decline of 0.4 percent, which is Rs. 15.3 billion lesser than the collection of FY 2017-2018.

    It is pertinent to mention that last time the negative growth (-2.6 percent) was recorded in 1967-68 in the FBR revenue collection.

    A look on the monthly growth trend indicates a very good increase in July 2018 and May 2019 but during the remaining ten months either growth was below the double digit or negative.

    As a whole during the year negative growth in revenue was recorded during five months as compared to corresponding months of the previous year, which is in fact very unusual behavior.

    The revenue performance during April and June have been very poor with around (-) 30.7 percent and (-) 8.9 percent negative growth.

  • Applicable withholding sales tax rates on various supplies

    Applicable withholding sales tax rates on various supplies

    KARACHI: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has notified withholding sales tax rates to be deducted / collected on various supplies by withholding agents.

    The FBR recently updated Sales Tax Act, 1990 and updated sales tax rates to be collected on various supplies under sub-section 7 of section 3 of the Act.

    The tax shall be withheld by the buyer at the rate as specified in the Eleventh Schedule, by any person or class of persons as withholding agent for the purpose of depositing the same, in such manner and subject to such conditions or restrictions as the Board may prescribe in this behalf through a notification in the official Gazette.

    Following rate of withholding sales tax shall be applicable:

    01. 1/5th of Sales Tax as shown on invoice to be collected from registered persons by (a) Federal and provincial government departments; autonomous bodies; and public sector organizations; (b) Companies as defined in the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (XLIX of 2001)

    02. 1/10th of Sales Tax as shown on invoice to be collected from person registered as a wholesaler, dealer or distributor by (a) Federal and provincial government departments; autonomous bodies; and public sector organizations; (b) Companies as defined in the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (XLIX of 2001)

    03. Whole of the tax involved or as applicable to supplies on the basis of gross value of supplies from unregistered persons by Federal and provincial government departments; autonomous bodies; and public sector organizations

    04. 5 percent of gross value of supplies from unregistered persons by companies as defined in the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (XLIX of 2001)

    05. Whole of sales tax applicable from person providing advertisement services by registered persons as recipient of advertisement services

    06. Whole of sales tax applicable from unregistered persons by registered persons purchasing cane molasses.

    The rates for withholding or deduction by the withholding agents not applicable to following goods and supplies:

    (i) Electrical energy;

    (ii) Natural Gas;

    (iii) Petroleum Products as supplied by petroleum production and exploration companies, oil refineries, oil marketing companies and dealers of motor spirit and high speed diesel;

    (iv) Vegetable ghee and cooking oil;

    (v) Telecommunication services;

    (vi) Goods specified in the Third Schedule to the Sales Tax Act, 1990;

    (vii) Supplies made by importers who paid value addition tax on such goods at the time of import; and

    (viii) Supplies made by an Active Taxpayer as defined in the Sales Tax Act, 1990 to another registered persons with exception of advertisement services.

  • Tax collection from salary income plunges by 43pc: State Bank

    Tax collection from salary income plunges by 43pc: State Bank

    KARACHI: The income tax collection from salary income has witnessed sharp decline of 43 percent during fiscal year 2018/2019 due to significant concession granted in the budget of election year.

    State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) in its annual report on State of Pakistan Economy 2018/2019, revealed that withholding income tax fell 43 percent to Rs76.4 billion in 2018/2019 as compared with Rs133.4 billion in the preceding fiscal year.

    The overall collection of withholding taxes declined by 8.2 percent to Rs960.7 billion in the fiscal year 2018/2019 as compared with Rs1,047 billion in the preceding fiscal year.

    Besides, collection of income tax from salary the collection of withholding tax from telephone also witnessed steep fall of 64 percent. The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) collected Rs17.2 billion during fiscal year 2018/2019 as compared with Rs47.4 billion in the preceding fiscal year.

    The collection of income tax from contracts witnessed 17 percent decline to Rs234.7 billion during the last fiscal year as compared with Rs283 billion in the preceding fiscal year.

    The SBP said that the decline in withholding taxes, having a share of nearly 65.0 percent in direct taxes, came from prominent reductions in the collection from salaries, contracts, cash withdrawals, and telephone.

    “While collection from salaries took a hit from concessions on income tax granted in the FY19 budget, the decline in PSDP spending lowered the collection from Contracts.”

    The composition of direct taxes is quite suboptimal reflecting lack of sufficient tax effort, the SBP said.

    The government relies heavily on withholding taxes, which downplays the role of revenue authorities.

    Furthermore, when these taxes are treated as final and are passed on to final consumers, they gain properties of indirect taxes. Despite a large tax machinery, comprising regional tax officers, nearly 64.1 percent of the income tax is collected via withholding agents such as banks, telecom companies, utility companies and car dealers.

    As for voluntary payments and collection on demand, their contribution is quite minimal. And even within the voluntary payments, around 90 percent collections are made in the form of advance tax; less than 10 percent comes through return filing.

  • Withholding tax collection on profit from bank deposits surges by 194pc

    Withholding tax collection on profit from bank deposits surges by 194pc

    KARACHI: The collection of withholding tax from profit on bank deposits registered unprecedented growth of 194 percent during first quarter of first fiscal year as the tax rates increased by 100 percent for persons not on the Active Taxpayers List (ATL).

    Sources in Regional Tax Office (RTO) –II Karachi said that the withholding tax collection under Section 151(1)(b) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 increased to Rs14.56 billion during first quarter (July – September) of fiscal year 2019/2020 as compared with Rs4.95 billion in the corresponding period of the last fiscal year.

    The sources explained that under Section 151(1)(b) withholding tax is collected on profit on debt paid by banking companies or financial institutions on account or deposit maintained.

    Every banking company is required to collect 10 percent of the gross yield/profit paid up to Rs500,000 or 15 percent of the gross yield / profit paid exceeding amount Rs500,000 at the time the profit on debt is credited to the account of the recipient or is actually paid, whichever is earlier.

    The sources said that it is mandatory for the banks to collect double the amount of withholding tax from those persons receiving profit on debt but not on the Active Taxpayers List (ATL).

    The government through Finance Act, 2019 introduced 10th Schedule to the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 to enhance the rate of withholding tax by 100 percent on certain transactions.

    The measure has been taken to force persons making large transactions and paying withholding tax on such transactions but remained outside the tax net.

    The sources said that after the implementation of the 10th Schedule the pace of return filing for Tax Year 2018 increased in order to avoid paying 100 percent higher rate of withholding tax.

    According to ATL updated October 21, 2019 the number of return filers were increased to 2.64 million for tax year 2018 as compared with 1.84 million returns received for tax year 2017.