Karachi, January 13, 2025 – A heated debate has erupted among taxpayers over the Federal Board of Revenue’s (FBR) plan to purchase 1,010 Honda City 1.2 L CVT cars as part of its initiative to strengthen enforcement measures.
Social media platforms have been abuzz with critical messages from taxpayers and stakeholders, expressing frustration and skepticism about the decision. Critics argue that using taxpayers’ money to procure such a large fleet of vehicles for the FBR’s field staff lacks justification. Many are demanding a clear rationale for the expenditure and an explanation of the anticipated benefits.
The FBR has defended the move, emphasizing that the acquisition aims to enhance its operational capabilities and improve enforcement against tax evasion. According to an official document, the FBR has issued a Letter of Intent (LoI) to Honda Atlas Cars (Pakistan) Limited, finalizing the purchase of the vehicles. These cars are slated for allocation to officers in BS-17 and BS-18 grades, who play a critical role in field enforcement activities.
FBR officials explained that the vehicles are essential for enforcing Point of Sale (POS) systems, e-invoicing, and the Track and Trace system. Currently, officers often use personal or rented vehicles, which not only undermines the authority of the state but also exposes personnel to security risks. “For effective enforcement in non-salaried sectors, the FBR’s field presence must be visible,” an official remarked. The department also clarified that these vehicles are strictly for official use and will be marked with distinct stickers to discourage personal use.
As part of the procurement plan, the FBR will make an upfront payment of Rs. 3 billion to cover the full cost of 500 units and a partial payment for the remaining 510 units. The balance will be settled upon the delivery of the first batch of 510 cars. The phased delivery process is expected to conclude by May 2025.
Despite the FBR’s assurances, public sentiment remains divided. Many argue that such a significant expenditure demands greater transparency, with calls for the FBR to provide detailed projections on how this investment will enhance tax collection and enforcement.
As the controversy unfolds, the FBR’s efforts to justify its decision will be closely scrutinized, particularly as it navigates the balance between operational efficiency and public accountability.