Author: Faisal Shahnawaz

  • Economic Survey 2018/2019: Almost all growth targets missed

    Economic Survey 2018/2019: Almost all growth targets missed

    ISLAMABAD: The outgoing fiscal year 2018-19 witnessed a muted growth of 3.29 percent against the ambitious target of 6.2 percent. The targets set for the various sectors missed or witnessed negative growth during fiscal year 2018/2019.

    According to Economic Survey 2018/2019 launched by Dr. Abdul Hafeez Shaikh, Advisor to Prime Minister on Finance and Revenue on Monday.

    It said that the target was based upon sectoral growth projections for agriculture, industry, and services at 3.8 percent, 7.6 percent and 6.5 percent respectively.

    The actual sectoral growth turned out to be 0.85 percent for agriculture, 1.4 percent for industry and 4.7 percent for services.

    Some of the major crops witnessed negative growth as production of cotton, rice and sugarcane declined by 17.5 percent, 3.3 percent and 19.4 percent respectively.

    The crops showing positive growth include wheat and maize which grew at the rate of 0.5 percent and 6.9 percent respectively.

    Other crops have shown growth of 1.95 percent mainly due to increase in production of pulses and oil seeds.

    Cotton ginning declined by 12.74 percent due to a decline in production of cotton crop.

    Livestock sector has shown a growth of 4.0 percent. The growth recorded for the forestry is 6.47 percent which was mainly due to increase in production of timber in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa ranging from 26.7 to 36.1 thousand cubic meters.

    The growth in industrial sector has been estimated at 1.40 percent. The mining and quarrying sector has witnessed a negative growth of 1.96 percent mainly due to reduction in production of natural gas (-1.98 percent) and coal (-25.4 percent).

    The large-scale manufacturing sector as per QIM data (from July 2017 to February 2018) shows a decline of 2.06 percent. Major decline has been observed in Textile (-0.27 percent), Food, Beverage & Tobacco (-1.55 percent), Coke & Petroleum Products (-5.50 percent), Pharmaceuticals (-8.67 percent), Chemicals (-3.92 percent), Non-Metallic Mineral Products (-3.87 percent), Automobiles (-6.11 percent) and Iron & Steel products (-10.26).

    On the other hand, the substantial growth in LSM has been observed in Electronics (34.63 percent) Engineering Products (8.63 percent) and Wood Products (17.84 percent). Electricity and gas sub sector has grown by 40.54 percent, whereas the construction activity has declined by 7.57 percent.

    The services sector has shown an overall growth of 4.71 percent. Wholesale and Retail Trade grew by 3.11 percent, while the Transport, Storage and Communication sector registered a growth of 3.34 percent mainly due to positive contribution by railways (38.93 percent), air transport (3.38 percent) and road transport (3.85 percent).

    Finance and insurance sector showed an overall growth of 5.14 percent. While the central banking has declined by 12.5 percent, a positive growth has been observed in scheduled banks (5.3 percent), non-scheduled banks (24.6 percent) and insurance activities (12.8 percent).

    The Housing Services has grown at 4.0 percent. The growth recorded in General Government Services is 7.99 percent which is mainly on account of increase in salaries of employees of federal, provincial and district governments.

    Other private services, comprising of various distinct activities such as computer related activities, education, health & social work, NGOs etc recorded a growth of 7.05 percent.

    The total investments as a percentage of GDP was recorded at 15.4 percent against the target of 17.2 percent. The fixed investment as percentage of GDP remained 13.8 percent against the target of 15.6 percent, while public and private investments remained at 4.0 and 9.8 percent against the target of 4.8 and 10.8 percent respectively.

    The National Savings remained at 10.7 percent of GDP against the target of 13.1 percent.

    The consumption growth was recorded at 11.9 percent compared to 10.2 percent growth recorded last year. As percentage of GDP, it increased to 94.8 percent compared to last year’s figure of 94.2 percent.

    On the demand side, the exports declined by 1.9 percent despite exchange rate depreciation, while imports declined by 4.9 percent.

    This helped in reducing the trade deficit by 7.3 percent during July- April FY 2019 while it had shown an expansion of 24.3 percent during the corresponding period of last year.

    The workers’ remittances played a major role in containing current account deficit to 4.03 percent of GDP. The CAD showed a contraction of 27 percent during July-April of the current year while it had expanded by 70 percent during the corresponding period of last year.

    The State Bank is following a contractionary policy to anchor the aggregate demand and address rising inflation on the back of high fiscal and current account deficits.

    The next year, agriculture sector is likely to rebound under Prime Minister’s Agriculture Emergency Program.

    The water availability is expected to be better as compared to current year. There is substantial increase in Agriculture Credit disbursement which is recorded at Rs. 805 billion during July-April FY2019 compared to Rs.666.2 billion during the corresponding period of last year, posting a growth of 20.8 percent.

    The import of agriculture machinery has recorded a growth of 10.95 during July-April FY2019 which is a good indicator. The base effect will also support growth in agriculture.

    The Large-Scale Manufacturing sector which posted a negative growth this year is likely to rebound on the back of expected growth in agriculture sector along with government initiatives in the construction sector, SMEs sector and tourism and automobile sector.

    Both, agriculture and LSM sector growth is likely to have a good impact on services sector on account of goods transport services linked to agriculture and wholesale trade.

    The fiscal tightening and the rising inflation on account of increasing utility prices, rationalization of taxes, measures to reduce the primary balance, and any further exchange rate adjustments, along with higher oil prices, protectionists tendencies in some of the economies and tightening monetary conditions in the developed countries leading to lower capital inflows will remain downside risk.

    It said that the outgoing five-year plan has seen an average growth of 4.7 percent against the target of 5.4 percent.

    This growth can be characterized as a consumption led growth. The unplanned borrowing from different sources increased both private and public consumption resulting in higher debt repayment liabilities, which created severe macroeconomic imbalances.

    The investment did not pick up as higher demand was met primarily through imports leading to enormous rise in external imbalances.

    Due to low growth in revenues and the unplanned and unproductive expenditures, the fiscal deficit widened. The persistence of large fiscal and current account deficits and associated build up of public and external debt became the major source of macroeconomic imbalance.

    The new elected government faces formidable macroeconomic challenges. The foremost challenge to the economy is the rising aggregate demand without corresponding resources to support it, leading to rising fiscal and external account deficits.

    To address the issue of severe macroeconomic instability and to put the economy on the path of sustained growth and stability, the government has introduced a comprehensive set of economic and structural reform measures.

    As a short-term measure to get a breathing space, the government secured $ 9.2 billion from friendly countries to build up buffers and to ensure timely repayment of previous loans.

    The government has also taken some overdue tough decisions i.e. increase in energy tariffs to stop further accumulation of circular debt, reduction in imports through regulatory duties and withdrawal of some of the tax relaxations given in the last budget in order to arrest the deterioration in primary balance.

    These painful decisions were tough for the new elected government, but at the same time were necessary for economic stabilization. Recently, staff level agreement has been negotiated with the IMF to avail Extended Fund Facility for achieving macroeconomic stability.

    The staff level agreement will now be placed before the IMF Board for its approval. The impact of macroeconomic adjustment policies, such as monetary tightening, exchange rate adjustment, expenditure control and enhancement of regulatory duties on non-essential imports, started to become visible this year.

    These steps have served to bring some degree of stability and have also helped in reducing economic uncertainty. However, the situation calls for sustained efforts.

    After witnessing a strong growth in 2017 at 4.0 percent, the global economic activity slowed during the second half of 2018 to 3.6 percent while it is expected to reduce further to 3.3 percent in 2019.

    The slowdown in economic activity is attributed to multiple factors, including rising trade tensions and tariff hikes between the United States and China, which is the biggest risk to financial stability in Eurozone.

    In contrast, some developing economies could be benefitting from this trade diversion as prices of these targeted goods may rise in US and China.

    This tariff battle between USA and China is estimated to have affected almost 2.5 percent of global trade. Germany’s unemployment rate has shown an increase for the first time since 2013 amid signs of slowing growth in Europe’s biggest economy.

    Uncertainty created by Brexit has led to decline in business confidence and has further contributed towards slowing of growth in Euro zone.

    In response to the growing global risks to the economy, the US Federal Reserve has adopted a more accommodative monetary policy stance.

    Similarly, other central banks around the world like the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan and the Bank of England have also moved to adopt a more accommodative stance while China has ramped up its fiscal and monetary stimulus to cope with the negative effect of trade tariffs.

    Resultantly, the tightening of financial conditions has reversed across countries. Likewise, emerging markets have witnessed resumption in portfolio flows, a decline in sovereign borrowing costs, and a strengthening of their currencies relative to the dollar.

    As the growth is likely to improve during the second half of 2019, it is projected to return to 3.6 percent in 2020. The projected improvement in global economic growth during the second half of 2019 is expected on account of gradual recovery and stabilization in Argentina and Turkey along with some other stressed emerging economies, current build-up of policy stimulus in China and improvement in global financial sentiments The growth beyond 2020 is predicted to stabilize, mainly supported by growth in China and India.

    However, the growth in advanced economies will continue to slow down on account of factors such as the fading of the impact of US fiscal stimulus, ageing trends and low productivity growth. On the other hand, the growth in emerging markets and developing economies is expected to stabilize at around 5 percent, though with substantial variation between countries.

    According to World Economic Outlook (WEO) April (2019), the baseline outlook for emerging Asia remains favourable, with China’s growth projected to slow gradually toward sustainable levels and convergence in frontier economies toward higher income levels.

    For other regions, the outlook is complicated by a combination of structural bottlenecks, slower advanced economy growth and, in some cases, high debt and tighter financial conditions.

    These factors, alongside subdued commodity prices and civil conflict in some cases, contributed to subdued medium-term prospects for Latin America; the Middle East, North Africa, and Pakistan region; and parts of sub-Saharan Africa.

  • Stocks nosedive by 938 points on budget, Zardari arrest

    Stocks nosedive by 938 points on budget, Zardari arrest

    KARACHI: The stock market on Monday nosedived by 938 points owing to scheduled budget announcement and arrest of Asif Ali Zardari, leader of Pakistan People’s Party.

    The benchmark KSE-100 index of Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) closed at 34,568 points as against 35,505 points showing a decline of 938 points.

    Analysts at Arif Habib Limited said that besides the anticipation of poor macro-economic statistics in the soon-to-be-released Economic Survey, budget woes kept the market under heavy selling pressure.

    Market opened negative 140 points and within minutes declined close to 500 points without any significant volume. Selling was observed across the board, which was further accentuated by Asif Zardari’s rejection of permanent bail by Islamabad High Court.

    By the end of session, the index saw decline of 1037 points and closed -938 points. Power sector led the volumes table with around 20 million shares (mainly contributed by KEL ~18.5 million), and followed by Banking Sector with 14.6 million shares (BOP ~7 million) and Cement with 7.2 million shares.

    Sectors contributing to the performance include Banks (-240 points), E&P (-159 points), Fertilizer (-119 points), Cement (-104 points) and O&GMCs (-70 points).

    Volumes declined significantly from 125 million shares to 92 million shares (-26 percent DoD). Average traded value also declined by 26 percent to reach US$ 23.5 million as against US$ 31.6 million.

    Stocks that contributed significantly to the volumes include KEL, BOP, UNITY, LOTCHEM and OGDC, which formed 40 percent of total volumes.

    Stocks that contributed positively include KEL (+11 points), FABL (+1pt), THALL (+1pt), APL (+0 points) and SHEL (+0 points). Stocks that contributed negatively include ENGRO (-63 points), HBL (-61 points), PPL (-60 points), OGDC (-58 points) and LUCK (-54 points).

  • FBR nominates focal persons for tax amnesty scheme

    FBR nominates focal persons for tax amnesty scheme

    ISLAMABAD: Member Inland Revenue – Policy has been nominated as the chief coordinator for successful implementation of tax amnesty scheme 2019.

    A notification issued on Monday, the FBR designated Inland Revenue officers for the implementation of the tax amnesty scheme 2019.

    The following officers have been nominated as focal persons:

    Dr. Hamid Ateeq Sarwar, Member Inland Revenue – Policy, Chief Coordinator;

    Faiz Ellahi Memon, Chief Commissioner-IR, Large Taxpayers Unit (LTU) Karachi, Coordinator South covering provinces of Sindh and Balochistan;

    Bashir Ullah Khan, Chief Commissioner-IR, Regional Tax office, Rawalpindi, Coordinator North, Province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Islamabad Capital Territory and areas falling within the jurisdiction of RTO Rawalpindi; and

    Asim Majeed Khan, Chief Commissioner-IR, LTU Lahore, Coordinator Central covering province of Punjab (excluding areas falling within the jurisdiction of RTO Rawalpindi).

    The coordinators would further nominate focal persons in each RTO and LTU falling within their jurisdiction for the implementation of asset declaration scheme.

    The FBR asked the chief commissioners-IR to transmit data relating to the asset declaration scheme on daily basis to the Chief Coordinator.

  • Rupee falls by Rs1.60 against dollar in mid-day trading

    Rupee falls by Rs1.60 against dollar in mid-day trading

    The Pakistani rupee experienced a significant decline against the US dollar in mid-day trading on Monday, falling by Rs1.60 in the interbank foreign exchange market.

    (more…)
  • Rs10 billion may be allocated for agri projects in budget 2019/2020

    Rs10 billion may be allocated for agri projects in budget 2019/2020

    ISLAMABAD: The government has decided to allocate record amount for agriculture growth in fiscal year 2019/2020, sources said on Monday.

    The sources said that the government may allocate around Rs10 billion to National Food Security and Research for 24 new development projects.

    While an amount of Rs1.39 billion likely to be allocated for the ongoing projects.

    An amount of Rs1.5 billion may be allocated for the expansion of small and medium dams. In order to improve water resources in the country an amount of Rs5.5 billion to be allocated.

    Other projects in the agriculture sector may be included:

    — Rs50 million for poultry industry;

    — Rs150 million for fish catch culture cluster development period;

    — Rs400 million for improving water resources in KPK

    — Rs500 million for national oil seed programs

    — Rs350 million for wheat output growth

    — Rs200 million for sugarcane output

    — Rs450 million for growth in rice product

    In the last fiscal year an amount of Rs1.8 billion was allocated for National Food Research and Security.

  • PTBA proposes withdrawal of restriction on input claim under Sindh sales tax

    PTBA proposes withdrawal of restriction on input claim under Sindh sales tax

    KARACHI: Pakistan Tax Bar Association (PTBA) has urged the Sindh government to withdraw the restriction on claiming input tax by services rendered by a taxpayer.

    The apex tax bar in its proposals for Sindh budget 2019/2020, said that no input tax is allowed to be claimed on goods or services acquired prior to six months preceding the date of commencement of the provision of taxable services by a taxpayer.

    It is recommended that such restriction should be eliminated.

    That any bar on admissibility of input tax borne by the taxpayer prior to six months preceding the commencement of provision of taxable services is against the basic principal of Value Added Tax (VAT). It is also not justifiable in case of a long term projects.

    Any assessment order can be amended by a tax officer on the basis of any subsequent information, etc. Such powers are arbitrary and unjust and may open the doors for harassment and corruption, the tax bar said.

    Therefore it is recommended that the taxpayer should first be confronted with a show-cause notice with substantial reasons and definite information/evidence(s) that warrant reopening or amending the assessment order.

    Further, the powers to amend any assessment order should only be vest with the Commissioner or Board only.

    This recommendation would introduce transparency in the tax system for revision of shut and close transactions and provide justice to the taxpayer.

    Highlighting another issue, the PTBA said that the taxpayer is required to retain records for a period of 10 years and show-cause notices may be issued within a period of 8 years from the date of relevant tax period.

    “This is in excess of the statute of limitation provided under the STA and ITO. It will not only put excess burden on the taxpayer, but also dis-incentivizes the tax authorities from taking timely action.”

    The time period for retention of records and assessment of tax should be reduced to 5 years.

    This would save taxpayers from practical difficulties and unnecessary burden while pushing the tax authorities to take more timely action.

    In another proposal, the PTBA said that the tax officer is empowered to ask for any information from a taxpayer without specifying the reason or nature of the case being investigated by him.

    Scope of Section 52(1) should be restricted to specific parties and transactions which are within the jurisdiction of Sindh and are specifically identified by the tax officer instead of fishing and roving enquiries.

    This promotes equity and natural justice and avoids harassment and unnecessary proceedings.

    At present the Sindh Revenue Board (SRB) may arbitrarily empower a Deputy Commissioner to exercise the powers of Commissioner (Appeals).

    This provision should be deleted. Such an amendment undermines the quasi-judicial function and weakens the judicial process by empowering a junior ranked officer to assume the powers of a quasi-judicial authority.

    At present recovery of demand can be initiated at any time after the assessment order is issued.

    Since an appeal may be filed within 30 days from the date of receipt of an assessment order, the recovery proceedings should not be initiated within such time.

    This recommendation would harmonize the Federal and Provincial tax laws.

    The PTBA said that a lot of services mentioned in the First Schedule are without H.S. Code/Tariff Headings which may create difficulties.

    It is suggested that all services should be marked with the respective Tariff Headings in order to avoid confusions on the part of assessing authorities as well as the registered persons.

    This recommendation would bring clarity, equity and harmony in the tax laws.

  • Profit on banking deposits: High tax rate planned for non-filers in budget 2019/2020

    Profit on banking deposits: High tax rate planned for non-filers in budget 2019/2020

    ISLAMABAD: A sharp increase in withholding tax rate (may be up to 30 percent) on profit on banking deposits has been planned for non-filers in order to make it almost impossible to stay remain unregistered, sources said.

    Sources told PkRevenue.com that Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) a large sum of banking system deposits were remained undocumented resulting large number of people out of tax net and massive tax evasion.

    Under Section 151 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 the withholding tax rate on profit on debt for filers is 10 percent with no limit on earned amount and 10 percent for non-filers up to Rs 0.5 million. However, 17.5 percent withholding tax rate for non-filers driving profit on debt above Rs0.5 million.

    The sources said that the tax rate for non-filers driving profit on debt above Rs0.5 million may be increased to 30 percent.

    According to State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) the total deposits of the banking system reached to all time high of Rs13.456 trillion by March 2019.

    The sources said that the proposed increase in profit on debt would force the people having undocumented or black money parked in the banking system to file their returns in order to reduce the tax impact.

    In return, the sources said, the FBR would get information of people having large amounts in the banking system.

  • Massive cut in tax exemptions, concessions likely in budget 2019/2020

    Massive cut in tax exemptions, concessions likely in budget 2019/2020

    ISLAMABAD: The government has planned to a massive cut tax in exemptions and concessions in the budget 2019/2020, which is scheduled to be announced on June 11, 2019.

    Sources told PkRevenue.com that the government had committed with the World Bank and other international agencies to withdraw large size exemptions given to various sectors and individuals in order to boost revenue collection, especially in the wake of difficult economic situation.

    The sources said that the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) had already initiated policy making and would introduce phases to withdraw available tax concessions and exemptions.

    According to Pakistan Revenue Mobilization Program funded by the World Bank, the FBR had already launched several initiatives including ongoing review of tax policy to formulate a medium-term tax policy framework and propose measures to reduce tax expenditure for the budget 2019/2020.

    The cost of tax exemptions and concessions in the fiscal year 2017/2018 was around Rs541 billion, which included: income tax Rs61.78 billion; sales tax Rs281 billion; and customs duty Rs198.15 billion.

    The sources said that in the first phase around 50 percent exemptions and concessions would be withdrawn in the budget 2019/2020.

    The World Bank on Pakistan report said multiple exemptions and discounted rates to select industries, economic actors, and economic activities (e.g. sugar, textiles, and fertilizer industries; ‘associations’ in the real estate sector; imports for infrastructure projects under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor) are granted in each year’s budget law, which distort competition and economic actors’ incentives. In FY2017/18, Pakistan’s tax expenditure (i.e., tax revenue foregone due to exemptions and concessional rates) was estimated at 2 percent of GDP, primarily due to exemptions from General Sales Tax (GST) and customs duties.

    “Substantial exemptions also apply to property taxes, whereby properties below a certain size are exempted regardless of location, while revenue is also lost due to unrealistically low valuations used for taxation purposes.”

    The Capital Gains Tax (CGT) returns negligible receipts due to the zero rate applied to capital gains from the sale of immovable property after more than four years of ownership, and rates of 5-10 percent for properties sold after one to four years of ownership, the report said.

    The present PTI-led government has issued a roadmap for stability, growth and productive employment issued in April 2019 and stated that tax policy has to balance the revenue objective with equity and growth objectives.

    Presently tax policy has a predominant revenue focus and as such is likely to create distortions in the economy which can adversely affect the growth and equity objectives.

    In addition, even the revenue objective is compromised by large scale exemptions. To correct this shortcoming, the government intends the following:

    i) Enact a law to ensure that no tax exemption is allowed through law or notification without an estimate of its cost independently by the tax department as well as the concerned ministry. Such cost will be made public before notification of the exemption.

    ii) Review all existing exemptions, with the purpose of eliminating as many of those as possible. Even if an exemption is to be retained its cost will be determined and made public. Ministry of Finance to publish annually a statement of tax expenditures to show how much revenue is being foregone due to exemptions.

    iii) Ensure that all exemptions, existing or newly proposed, will have a sunset clause (ideally not more than 5 years).

    iv) Publish a list of all government owned, quasi-government and government-linked enterprises availing tax exemption/concession in any way along with quantification of the tax expenditure. In addition, a plan be prepared for phasing out of these concessions.

    v) Withdraw FBR powers to issue SROs to grant exemptions. This power will vest only with the Parliament.

    vi) Ensure that all non-procedural existing SROs will expire at the end of the fiscal year. Steps taken over the last two years to incorporate all exemptions granted through SROs to be made part of the body of law.

  • Protest on June 10 against plan to abolish zero-rate sales tax

    Protest on June 10 against plan to abolish zero-rate sales tax

    KARACHI: Textile value added sector has announced to stage protest on Monday June 10, 2019 against proposed plan to abolish sales tax zero-rating for export sector.

    Muhammad Jawed Bilwani, Chief Coordinator for Five Zero Rated Export Sectors in a statement on Saturday said that the exporters and manufacturers would stage peaceful protest outside the Karachi Press Club and would also hold a press conference to explain the negative impact of this proposed plan.

    The government reportedly decided in principle to abolish zero rating for five export oriented sectors especially for textile from the next budget 2019-2020.

    According to estimates prepared by the FBR, the total value of domestic and exports stood at Rs3 trillion out of which approximately Rs1.2 trillion was exported while remaining share of Rs1.8 trillion being consumed into the country.

    The rate of GST might be less than 17 percent as the FBR considers that the higher rate at initial stage would create more problems so the rate might be fixed lower than the standard rate.

    Earlier in a joint press conference on May 28, 2019 the Chairmen of Value Added Export Sector Associations stated that discontinuation of zero rated status will result in ruin and disaster of export oriented industries, flight of capital, mass unemployment and huge foreign exchange losses.

    It will also lead to corruption in connivance with dubious FBR officials under the mode of flying invoices, over invoicing, frauds in refunds etc.

    Further, due to significant volumes of liquidity being stuck in the form of sales tax refunds, export growth will be severely affected and we may even witness a decline in exports.

    More than 200 billion rupees of exporters in Refunds of Sales Tax, Customs Rebate, Withholding Tax, DLTL & DDT are already held up with Government.

    They also conveyed serious apprehension on proposed abolition of Final Tax Regime (FTR) for exporters.

    The Chairmen and Representatives of Council of All Pakistan Textile Mills Associations, Pakistan Apparel Forum, Pakistan Hosiery Manufacturers & Exporters Association, Pakistan Textile Exporters Association, Pakistan Bedwear Exporters Association, Towel Manufacturers Association of Pakistan, Pakistan Cloth Merchant Association, Pakistan Knitwear and Sweater Exporters Association, Pakistan Denim Manufacturers & Exporters Association, All Pakistan Textile Processing Mills Association, Pakistan Readymade Garment Manufacturers & Exporter Association, Pakistan Cotton Fashion Apparels Manufacturers & Exporters Association, The Surgical Instrument Manufacturers Association of Pakistan, Pakistan Leather Garments Manufacturers & Exporters Association, Pakistan Tanners Association, Pakistan Sports Goods Manufacturers & Exporters Association, Pakistan Carpet Manufacturers & Exporters Association, All Pakistan Bedsheets & Upholstery Manufacturers Association have fervently appealed to continue the Zero-Rating Scheme in the national interest to uplift exports. The five zero rated sectors are already documented and contribute 70% of total Nation’s exports and generate 50% of total Nation’s employment.

    They added that collecting sales tax and then refunding – is a futile exercise which creates hassles for exporters and also opens flood gates of corruption. No collection and no refund of sales tax from five zero rated export sectors is a tried and tested formula for increasing revenue and exports. We must not forget that during last two decades the Government had tried to undo zero rating twice but miserably failed, hence, zero rating was reintroduced. The zero rated scheme, in consultation with stakeholders, can further be improved for much better outcome.

    They added that the Government rather than involving in futile exercise of collecting sales tax and then refunding should focus its energy on increasing the number of taxpayers. According to FBR, in year 2017 number of active taxpayers was only 1.13 million only (0.51% of total population).

    They warned that Government’s attempt to collect interest free money in shape of sales tax will put the country’s export at stake. Today, in this period of worst economic crisis, can we afford to do away with zero rated status for the five export oriented industries? they questioned. They cautioned that if the Zero-Rating Scheme is discontinued, 30 percent of the export will decline in first year. They urged the Government to broaden the tax-base rather than burdening the existing tax-payers and documented sectors of the economy.

    Pakistan rupee has been devalued approx. 20.16 percent against dollar from 123.6 to 149.07 in just 9 months. Such state of affairs when the dollar is appreciating and banks are also reluctant to fix dollar rates, the Textile Exporters will be aggrieved in case of BMR because some machineries are delivered in 6 to 8 months and cost of machinery is increased to 20% during the period. Previously, on assurances of the Government to continue zero rating, exporters made huge investment in shape of BMR.

    They articulated that the Government focused on enhancing exports and identified the Five Zero-Rated Export Sectors as the main engines of growth for this purpose whereby Power Division vide Notification SRO12(I)/2019 dated 1st January, 2019 has revised the power tariff for zero rated industrial consumers to net 7.5 cents / kwh and OGRA vide Notification dated 18th October 2018 has been fixed Gas tariff for Registered Manufacturers or Exporters of five Zero-Rated sectors and their Captive Power to Rs600/- per MMBTU but discontinuation of zero rating status from the five export sector will put all the hard efforts of the government in vain.

    The Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce & Industry, Karachi Chamber of Commerce & Industry, Lahore Chamber of Commerce & Industry, Faisalabad Chamber of Commerce & Industry & Sialkot Chamber of Commerce & Industry have also supported the stance and demand of Value Added Export Sector Associations to continue zero-rating scheme for the betterment of economy and export enhancement.

  • Economic Survey 2018/2019 to be launched June 10; GDP growth likely at 3.3 percent

    Economic Survey 2018/2019 to be launched June 10; GDP growth likely at 3.3 percent

    ISLAMABAD: The ministry of finance will present Economic Survey for 2018/2019 on June 10 (Monday) under which the GDP growth may be announced to fall 3.3 percent against the target of 6.3 percent.

    The government, however, set the economic growth at 4 percent for the next fiscal year.

    The economic survey may show a slide in manufacturing sector growth by 0.3 percent. The government sets target of two percent for 2019/2020.

    Large Scale Manufacturing (LSM) has shown negative growth of 2 percent in the ongoing fiscal year against target 8.1 percent. The LSM growth target has been set at 2.8 percent for next fiscal year.

    Services sector growth fell by 4.7 percent against growth target of 6.5 percent in the fiscal year 2018/2019. Services sector likely to show growth of 4.8 percent in 2019/2020.

    Construction sector exhibited negative trend, drop by 7.6 percent against the target of 10 percent for the current fiscal year. The growth target for construction sector has been set at 1.5 percent.

    Agriculture sector growth remained flat at 0.8 percent against the target of 3.8 percent. However, the present government sets 2.9 percent growth target for the next fiscal year.

    Main commodity recorded a slide of 6.5 percent. Main commodities production for 2019-20 set at 3.5 percent.

    Other commodities output increased by 1.5 percent. In 2018-2019 target set 3.5 percent, for 2018/2019 target was 3.5 percent.

    Cotton output has decreased by 12.7 percent against growth target of 8.9 percent. Cotton output target has been set at 3.1 percent in 2019/2020.

    Livestock grew by 3 percent against target of 3.8 percent. Meanwhile, growth target for livestock for 2019-20 set at 2.5 percent.