Author: Faisal Shahnawaz

  • Rupee gains five paisas against dollar in early trade

    Rupee gains five paisas against dollar in early trade

    KARACHI: The Pak Rupee gained five paisas against dollar in early trade on Monday owing to monitoring by authorities for import payments.

    The dollar is being traded at Rs141.25 in interbank foreign exchange market. The foreign currency market was ended at Rs141.30 to the dollar on last Friday.

    Last week the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) said that large payments had been made and the local currency would recover against the greenback.

    The SBP told this at a meeting with members of Forex Association of Pakistan (FAP). Since then the rupee gained 25 paisas till today morning.

    Currency experts however said that the latest World Bank report issued on Sunday April 07, 2019, pointed out difficulties to Pakistan economy and forecast lower growth during two fiscal years.

    The experts said that the weak economic indicators may exert pressure on the local currency in coming months.

  • Sales Tax Act 1990: buyer, seller jointly responsible for unpaid tax

    Sales Tax Act 1990: buyer, seller jointly responsible for unpaid tax

    KARACHI: Where an amount of tax unpaid in supply chain then registered buyer and seller are both responsible for paying to national exchequer.

    According to updated Sales Tax Act, 1990 issued by Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), the Section 8A explained joint and several liability regarding unpaid tax.

    Section 8A: Joint and several liability of registered persons in supply chain where tax unpaid.

    Where a registered person receiving a taxable supply from another registered person is in the knowledge or has reasonable grounds to suspect that some or all of the tax payable in respect of that supply or any previous or subsequent supply of the goods supplied would go unpaid, of which the burden to prove shall be on the department such person as well as the person making the taxable supply shall be jointly and severally liable for payment of such unpaid amount of tax:

    Provided that the Board may by notification in the official gazette, exempt any transaction or transactions from the provisions of this section.

    Section 8B: Adjustable input tax.

    Sub-Section (1): Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, in relation to a tax period, a registered person shall not be allowed to adjust input tax in excess of ninety per cent of the output tax for that tax period:

    Provided that the restriction on the adjustment of input tax in excess of ninety percent of the output tax, shall not apply in case of fixed assets or Capital goods:

    Provided further that the Board may by notification in the official Gazette, exclude any person or class of persons from the purview of sub-section (1).

    Sub-Section (2): A registered person, subject to sub-section (1), may be allowed adjustment or refund] of input tax not allowed under sub-section (1) subject to the following conditions, namely:

    (i) in the case of registered persons, whose accounts are subject to audit under the Companies Ordinance, 1984, upon furnishing a statement along with annual audited accounts, duly certified by the auditors, showing value additions less than the limit prescribed under sub-section (1) above; or

    (ii) in case of other registered persons, subject to the conditions and restrictions as may be specified by the Board by notification in the official Gazette.

    Sub-Section (3): The adjustment or refund of input tax mentioned in sub-sections (2), if any, shall be made on yearly basis in the second month following the end of the financial year of the registered person.

    Sub-Section (4): Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-sections (1) and (2), the Board may, by notification in the official Gazette, prescribe any other limit of input tax adjustment for any person or class of persons.

    Sub-Section (5): Any auditor found guilty of misconduct in furnishing the certificate mentioned in sub-section (2) shall be referred to the Council for disciplinary action under section 20D of Chartered Accountants, Ordinance, 1961 (X of 1961).

  • Higher duties create anti-export bias: World Bank highlights constraints to Pakistan’s exporters

    Higher duties create anti-export bias: World Bank highlights constraints to Pakistan’s exporters

    KARACHI: World Bank has identified three main constraints that are directly affecting Pakistan exporters. These are the anti-export bias of its trade policy, the inadequate export promotion infrastructure, and an ambiguous regulatory framework around FDI.

    The World Bank said that many factors affect competitiveness in Pakistan.

    These include, among others, high costs of doing business, electricity availability at affordable costs, or access to finance.

    The World Bank pointed out constraints that high duties on imports create an anti-export bias, considerably reducing the ability of Pakistan’s firms to integrate into global markets.

    The structure of Pakistan’s taxes on imports displays two features that prevent firms from leveraging regional and Global Value Chains (GVCs) to sell Pakistan’s goods and services to the world, to increase productivity, and to create more and better jobs.

    “First, Pakistan’s import duties are high – with a marked escalation: the average difference between tariffs on final goods and raw materials was 10.4 percentage points in 2016, and between intermediate goods and for raw material it was of 2.2 percentage points.”

    The World Bank said that this creates an incentive for firms to focus on the local market, in which they enjoy higher profit margins due to the tariffs on the final goods, rather than innovating and venturing into competitive global markets.

    “In fact, the policy response to the increasing trade deficit has been to increase import duties, which further increases the anti-export bias,” the World Bank added.

    Second, duty suspension schemes for exporters that source intermediates from abroad work imperfectly. “It takes 60 days to get the scheme approved – double the time stipulated by law and clearing customs under the scheme takes between 5 to 10 days.”

    In addition, the complexity of securing the scheme approval is such that only 3 percent of textile and apparel exporters use it, it continued.

    Duty rebate schemes, instead, are more widely used – about 50 percent of textiles and apparel exporters use them, although more than half of the firms claim a waiting time of 250 days and more to receive the rebate.

    The second most important issue discussed by the World Bank, stating that export promotion infrastructure is not aligned with international good practices.

    Evidence collected through private sector consultations in Punjab, Sindh, Islamabad and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa also revealed that exporters lack support in terms of provision of export intelligence, which in other countries has effectively reduced the information frictions that new and small exporters face and that substantially increase their trade costs.

    This has been validated by a recent assessment of the main export promotion agency in Pakistan, the Trade Development Authority (TDAP), conducted by the International Trade Center (ITC).

    “ITC assesses the performance of TDAP at ‘below average’ in its latest benchmarking exercise of 2017, pointing to several challenges, including lack of support to value chain development, lack of client datasets, and client management systems, as well as lack of monitoring and evaluation frameworks for its interventions.”

    Indeed, the existing support focuses on participation in trade fairs for well-established export sectors (textiles and apparel), rather than focusing on connecting new or potential exporters with global buyers, that tend to have been more impactful, according to international evidence. “Inadequate export promotion interventions underlie the little diversification of Pakistan’s export bundle as well as the low entry rates into exporting observed in the data.”

    The World Bank said that the policy regime towards foreign direct investment increases the risks perceived by foreign firms.

    With global trade being structured around Global Value Chains, a country’s success in boosting exports is inextricably linked with its ability in attracting FDI. “Pakistan’s record in FDI inflows is lackluster, with inflows averaging 1.5 percent of GDP between 2005 and 2017, compared to 6.1 percent of GDP in Vietnam over the same period.”

    Part of the difficulties lie with the perception of security challenges in Pakistan, which discourages FDI inflows into the economy – indeed, an important challenge has been attracting clients or senior management from abroad to visit premises of multinationals in Pakistan.

    However, policies have not helped either.

    The investment regulatory framework shows inconsistencies between the Investment Law of 1976, which is relatively protectionist, and the Investment Policy of 2013, which is relatively more market friendly, although without the rank of a ‘law’.

    These inconsistencies create uncertainty among foreign investors, reducing their incentives to incur substantial largely irreversible investments, and further constraining the realization of export potentials in Pakistan, the World Bank said.

    The last fiscal year showed a record-high trade deficit in Pakistan, at USD 31.1 billion, contributing to a current account deficit of 6.1 percent of GDP.

    The observed trade deficit resulted from the combination of consumption-led growth, that fueled demand for imports, and mounting constraints to export competitiveness.

    Between 2005 and 2018, Pakistan’s merchandise exports rose from USD 16 billion to USD 23 billion, an increase of only 47 percent compared to an increase of 286 percent in Bangladesh, 563 percent in Vietnam or 193 percent in India.

    “Its exports have been concentrated in a few products with little sophistication like textiles, apparel and rice.

    “Its exporting firms remain small, when compared to those in peer countries, and there is little entry into and exit out of export activities.”

  • Customs to auction huge quantity of vehicles, motor bikes on April 09

    Customs to auction huge quantity of vehicles, motor bikes on April 09

    KARACHI: Pakistan Customs has announce public auction of used motor vehicles and heavy bikes to be held on April 09, 2019 at Bay West, West Wharf Road, Karachi.

    Auction of fresh vehicles under schedule No. 04/ 2019 to be held on April 09, 2019:

    01. Nissan Moco Car, Chassis No. MG33S-1434760, year 2014

    02. Honda-N car, Chassis No. JGI-1208909, year 2016

    03. Toyota Aqua Hybrid Car, Chassis No. NHP10-6492089, year 2016, capacity 1496ml

    04. Toyota Passo, Chassis No. M700A-0068740, Year 2017, Capacity 996cc

    05. Toyota Aqua Hybrid Car, Chassis No. NHP10-6675744, year 2017, capacity 1496ml

    06. Daihatsu Move Car, Chassis No. LA160S-0022740, year 2016, capacity 658cc

    07. Honda Vezel Hybrid Car, Chassis No. RU3-1009600, Year 2014

    08. Suzuki Alto, Chassis No. HA36S-318639, year 2019-04-07

    09. Toyota Prius Hybrid car, chassis no. ZVW50-6057948, capacity 1797ml, year 2016

    10. Suzuki Wagon-R, chassis no. NH34-535805, year 2016

    11. Suzuki Alto, Chassis No. HA36S-283360, year 2016

    12. Toyota Prius Hybrid Car, Chassis No. AVW50-6040670, year 2016, capacity 1797cc

    13. Toyota Aqua Hybrid Car, chassis No. NHP10-6489786, year 2016, capacity 1496ml

    14. Suzuki Alto Lapin Car, Chassis No. HE33S-114646, year 2015

    15. Suzuki Every Wago, Chassis No. DA17W-160902, Year 2018

    16. Honda-N WGN Car, Chassis No. JHI-1399120, year 2018, milage 562kms

    17. Honda Fit Hybrid Car, Chassis No. GP5-3313188, year 2016

    18. Suzuki Every Van, Chassis No. Da64V-827933, year 2013

    19. Toyota Aqua Hybrid Car, Chassis No. NHP10-6537080, year 2016, Capacity 1496ml

    20. Nissan Dayz Car, Chassis No. B21W-0473466, Year 2017

    21. Honda Vezel Hybrid Car, Chassis No. RU3-1129894, year 2016

    22. Suzuki Wagon-R Car, Chassis No. MH35S-109600, year 2017

    23. Nissan Dayz Roox Car, Chassis No. B21A-0346728, year 2017

    24. Daihatsu Hijet Cargo Van, Chassis No. S331V-0119751, year 2014, Capacity 658cc

    25. Honda Fit Hybrid Car, Chassis No. GP5-1213366, Year 2016

    26. Toyota CH-R Hybrid, Chassis No. ZYX10-2030563, year 2017, capacity 1797ml

    27. Daihatsu Mira E:S, Chassis No. La350S-0087051, year 2018, capacity 658cc

    28. Toyota Aqua Hybrid Car, Chassis No. NHP10-2545720, year 2016, capacity 1496ml

    29. Suzuki Alto Car, Chassis No. HA36S-339803, year 2017, capacity 658cc

    30. Daihatsu Move Car, Chassis No. LA160S-0029143, year 2017, capacity 658cc

    31. Toyota Voxy Van, Chassis No. ZWR80-0035138, year 2014, capacity 1794ml

    32. Suzuk Wagon-R, Chassis No. NH34S-532308

    33. Honda Vezel Hybrid, Chassis No. RU3-1202746, year 2016

    34. Suzuki Singray Wagon-R, Chassis No. MH44S-509107, Year 2016

    35. Suzuki Alto Car, Chassis No. HA36S-367262, year 2017

    Auction of leftover vehicles:

    01. Suzuki Audi, Chassis No. WAUZZZGAIJ018984, mileage 3664km

    02. Suzuki Bandit Car, Chassis No. MA36S-609297, year 2015

    03. Toyota Passo Car, Chassis No. M710A-0005138, year 2016, capacity 998cc

    04. Toyota Prius Hybrid Car, Chassis No. ZVW41-0037004, year 2016, capacity 1797

    05. Toyota Aqua Hybrid Car, Chassis No. NHP10-6360564, year 2014, capacity 1496ml

    06. Range Rover Evoque, Chassis No. SALVA2AG70H828587, year 2013

    07. Suzuki Lapin Car, Chassis No. HE33S-179190, year 2017

    08. Daihatsu Copen Car, Chassis No. LA400K-0007555, year 2014, capacity 658cc

    09. Mitsubishi Mirage Car, Chassis No. A03A-0034375, year 2015

    10. Daihatsu Move Car, Chassis No. LA150S-0119262

    Used motor bikes:

    i. New Arctic Cat ATV Bike, Chassis No. RFB14ATV3EK6T0888, year 2014, Capacity 90cc

    ii. New Arctic Cat ATV Bike, Casssis No. RFB14ATVXEK6T0905, year 204, capacity 90cc

    iii. New Arctic Cat ATV Bike, Chassis No. RFB14ATVXEK6T0919, year 2014, capacity 90cc

    iv. New Arctic Cat ATV Bike, Chassis No. RFB14ATV2EK6T0896, year 2014, capacity 90cc

    v. New Arctic Cat ATV Bike, Chassis No. RFB14ATV9EK6T0928, year 2014, capacity 90cc

    vi. New Arctic Cat ATV Bike, Chassis No. RFB14ATV9EK6T0894, year 2014, capacity 90cc

    vii. New Arctic Cat ATV Bike, Chassis No. RFB14ATV3EK6T0910, year 2014, capacity 90cc

    viii. New Arctic Cat ATV Bike, Chassis No. RFB14ATV3EK6T0938, year 2014, capacity 90cc

  • Accountability framework for FBR officials suggested to make tax audit transparent

    Accountability framework for FBR officials suggested to make tax audit transparent

    KARACHI: Pakistan Tax Bar Association (PTBA) has said that there should be accountability framework for tax officers in order to make audit transparent.

    Abdul Qadir Memon, President, PTBA in a message to PTBA Tax Journal outlined eight-point recommendations to tax authorities for making audit system more transparent in order to boost confidence of taxpayers on the authorities.

    Memon said that the accountability framework and service standards should be introduced for the employees of Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), more particularly for the revenue officers in respect of quality of assessment order and standing of their orders in the test of appeal including but not limited to final revenue generated by the exchequer.

    The PTBA said that laws should be formulated in such a manner that there is a clarity, certainty and finality of an assessment, which has been universally recognized as hallmark of audit and an assessment.

    Following are suggestions for effective audit selection mechanism and amendment of assessment based on cogent, honest, justifiable with reasoning and intelligible nexus with the tax affairs of the taxpayers and capacity to pay tax:

    — To place sophisticated tax intelligence system to gather data from withholding collection of taxes and third party information collected on the basis of transactions conducted through computerized national identity cards (CNICs).

    — Cases are selected by the FBR only on the basis of defined risk areas or red flags trigger tax audit. The field forces are restricted to conduct audit of only such cases.

    — The amendment of assessment is framed by the field forces under the following circumstances guided the rules of justice, equity and judicial conscious:

    i. Any income chargeable to tax or sales has escaped assessment, under assessed, assessed at low rate or has been misclassified on the basis of definite information.

    ii. The deemed assessment is erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of revenue.

    — In line with global practice (USA, UK, New Zealand, Australia, Canada) to provide a more supportive legislative and administrative environment for existing self-assessment arrangements and to make the taxation system fairer and more certain, it is imperative that a system of Binding Public and Private Ruling for Resident and Non-Residents be introduced.

    — The commissioner should not be empowered to amend the assessment as many times as may be necessary on the same issue or point, which has already been subject matter of reassessment or further assessment proceedings.

    — The time limit for amendment of assessment should be reduced to two years from the end of the financial years in which the commissioner has issued the original order to the taxpayer and one year in case of amended assessment; whichever is later.

    — Relevant laws under the provisions of Direct and Indirect Taxes should be amended in a manner that:

    i. Once the audit for any tax year is conducted/completed under Section 177 read with Section 214C of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001; there should not be any audit of monitoring of withholding/collection of taxes and amendment of assessment unless ‘definite information’ comes into the possession of the commissioner.

    ii. Once the sales tax audit for any year is conducted in respect of registered taxpayer under the Section 72B there should not be audit under Section 25 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990.

  • World Bank projects Pakistan’s growth to decelerate in FY19, FY20

    World Bank projects Pakistan’s growth to decelerate in FY19, FY20

    KARACHI: World Bank has projected lower GDP growth for Pakistan during two fiscal years i.e. 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 to 3.4 percent and 2.7 percent, respectively.

    The World Bank in a report released on Sunday, said that growth for Pakistan is projected to decelerate to 3.4 percent in FY19 and to 2.7 percent in FY20, as the government tightens fiscal and monetary policies.

    “While domestic demand growth will slow down immediately, net ex¬ports will only increase gradually,” it added.

    The World Bank said that as macroeconomic conditions improve, and a package of structural reforms in fiscal management and competitiveness is implemented, growth is expected to recover to 4.0 percent in 2020/2021.

    “This baseline scenario assumes stable international oil prices and reduced political and security risks,” it added.

    Inflation is expected to rise to 7.1 percent (average) in FY19 and projected to reach 13.5 percent in FY20 as a result of further exchange rate depreciation pass-through.

    The trade deficit is projected to remain elevated during 2018/2019, but to narrow in 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 as the impacts of currency depreciation, domestic demand compression, and other regulatory measures to curb imports set in.

    Remittances are projected to finance over 70 percent of the trade deficit.

    FDI, multilateral and bilateral debt-creating flows as well as financing from international markets are expected to be the main financing sources of the current account in the near to medium term.

    The fiscal deficit is projected to increase to 6.9 percent in 2018/2019 and to remain high during next two fiscal years, a result of large interest payments and a slow increase in domestic revenues.

    Public debt to GDP is expected to cross 80 percent in 2018/2019 and to remain elevated in the next two years, increasing Pakistan’s exposure to debt-related shocks.

    The pace of poverty reduction is expected to continue to slow-down in FY19 and FY20, following the projected growth deceleration and higher inflation rates.

    Together with the macroeconomic adjustment expected over the next two years, there is an urgent need to implement structural reforms to support the growth rebound from FY21 onwards.

    Economic uncertainty has increased due to protracted negotiations with the IMF.

    In addition, recent regional tensions have had an impact on risk perceptions.

    The low reserves position and high debt-ratios limit the buffers that Pakistan could use to absorb external shocks (such as an increase in US interest rates) and may negatively impact the government’s ability to access international markets.

    Reforms to put the country on a stable growth path include increased exchange rate flexibility, improved competitiveness and lower cost of doing business.

    On the revenue front, reforms to improve tax administration, widen the tax base and facilitate tax compliance are critical.

    Higher inflation rates may jeopardize recent gains in poverty reduction, since poor households in urban areas are particularly affected by increases in prices, as shown by the most recent inflation hike during the 2007-08 food price crisis.

  • FBR issues notices to 350 Sindh bureaucrats for non-filing

    FBR issues notices to 350 Sindh bureaucrats for non-filing

    KARACHI: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has issued notices to 350 senior bureaucrats of Sindh government for non-filing of income tax returns.

    The notices have been issued by Regional Tax Office (RTO) –II Karachi on identification of expenditures through various sources by those provincial government officers.

    The FBR sources said that these government officers had never filed their annual income tax returns and asset declarations with the income tax departments.

    They said that the expenditures details had been obtained through their air travels, banking transactions, purchase of property purchase etc.

    The information of those provincial government officers were obtained from their salary disbursements.

    They said that the tax department would first enforce income tax returns and then would initiate proceedings of concealment.

    The sources said that besides taking action against bureaucrats of Sindh government the RTO –II Karachi was also taking action against 3,000 more salary persons in the private sector to bring them into tax net.

    The sources said that many of these salary persons had never filed income tax returns despite having taxable income as well as other source of income.

  • DRAP warns pharma industry against increasing drug prices

    DRAP warns pharma industry against increasing drug prices

    ISLAMABAD: Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan (DRAP) has taken notice of unauthorized increase in prices of medicines.

    In this regard the authority issued directives to pharmaceutical industries asking them to ensure maximum retail price (MRP).

    “Your are advised to monitor MRPs in the market and ensure that MRPs of drugs are not higher than the prices notified through SRO 1610(I)/2018 dated December 31, 2018.”

    In case of stocks available in the retail shops or manufactured/imported prior to issuance of this above said SROs must be sold at previous MRPs printed on the label in the manner prescribed by the Drugs (Labeling and Packing) Rules, 1986 and stickers/ cuttings are not allowed.

    The authority said that some complaints had been received that unscrupulous elements in the pharma industry had increased prices of their drugs over and above approved maximum retail prices by the federal government.

    In recent past MRPs of 889 drugs were notified after approval by the federal government through SRO 1610(I)/2018 dated December 31, 2018.

    In addition an increase at 9 percent over and above the notified prices was allowed on January 10, 2019. Besides, another 15 percent increase was allowed on the same date in case of several other drugs.

    The authorities said that in case of non-compliance by pharma industry, legal action would be taken against violators under the Drugs Act, 1976, DRAP Act, 2012 and rules framed three under and SRO 913 dated September 09, 2019.

  • Weekly Review: Market to positively respond to IMF talks

    Weekly Review: Market to positively respond to IMF talks

    KARACHI: The equity market likely to stay positive in coming weeks as the expected staff level meeting of IMF is scheduled in April 2019.

    Analysts at Arif Habib Limited said that this will revive the market sentiment.

    Moreover, interest rate is expected to peak following another 50 basis points hike in May 2019; which will bring clarity to the investors.

    On the currency front, the analysts expect the Pak Rupee to settle at 147/USD by June 2019.

    Moreover, result of offshore drilling at Indus offshore block G ‘Kekra-1’ is also expected within six weeks, where materialization of oil / gas discovery will drive the market in general and OGDC and PPL in particular.

    The analysts said that this week trading commenced on a negative note despite China depositing USD 2.2 billion to support the balance of payments position and depleting foreign exchange reserves which crossed the USD 17 billion mark.

    Market activity remained depressed on the back of i) 50bps increase in policy rate augmenting pressure on leveraged industries, ii) higher than expected inflationary readings; at 9.41 percent YoY in March 2019 (5-year high), iii) continuous depreciation of PKR against the Greenback, iv) delay in finalisation of the IMF program which is now expected by May, and v) projected slowdown by the Asian Development Bank of Pakistan’s GDP to 3.9 percent.

    The benchmark KSE-100 of Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) closed at CY19’s lowest level of 37,522 points, down by 1,128 points or 2.92 percent WoW.

    Contribution to the downside was led by i) Commercial Banks (-383 points) due to foreign selling, ii) Fertilizer (-134 points) amid announcement of 100,000 tons of urea import, iii) Oil and Gas Marketing Companies (-35 points) on account of slowdown in petroleum off-take by 17 percent YoY in Mar’19, iv) Pharmaceuticals (-92 points), and v) Power Generation and Distribution (-67 points). Scrip wise major losers were HBL (-122 points), UBL (-71 points), PPL (-58 points), ENGRO (-51 points), and PSO (-47 points). While the only sector that contributed positively to the index was Miscellaneous (+57 points).

    Foreign selling witnessed this week clocked in at USD 3.7 million compared to a net buy of USD 0.5 million last week.

    Major selling was witnessed in Fertilizer (USD 1.6 million) and Power Generation (USD 1.6 million).

    On the local front, buying was reported by Individuals (USD 5.5 million) followed by Banks / DFIs (USD 4.7 million).

    That said, average daily volumes for the outgoing week were down by 7.5 percent to 118.7 million shares likewise value traded declined by 20.4 percent to USD 24.9 million.

  • Sales Tax Act 1990: deduction of input tax by registered persons

    Sales Tax Act 1990: deduction of input tax by registered persons

    KARACHI: A sales tax registered person is allowed to deduct input tax against output tax for determination of taxable supplies made during a period.

    According to updated Sales Tax Act 1990 issued by Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), Section 7 explained the procedure of deduction of input tax by sales tax registered persons.

    Section 7: Determination of tax liability.

    Sub-Section (1): Subject to the provisions of section 8 and, for the purpose of determining his tax liability in respect of taxable supplies made during a tax period, a registered person shall, subject to the provisions of section 73, be entitled to deduct input tax paid or payable during the tax period for the purpose of taxable supplies made, or to be made, by him from the output tax excluding the amount of further tax under sub-section (1A) of section 3 that is due from him in respect of that tax period and to make such other adjustments as are specified in Section 9:

    Provided that where a registered person did not deduct input tax within the relevant period, he may claim such tax in the return for any of the six succeeding tax periods.

    Sub-Section (2): A registered person shall not be entitled to deduct input tax from output tax unless,-

    (i) in case of a claim for input tax in respect of a taxable supply made, he holds a tax invoice in his name and bearing his registration number in respect of such supply for which a return is furnished:

    Provided that from the date to be notified by the Board in this respect, in addition to above, if the supplier has not declared such supply in his return or he has not paid amount of tax due as indicated in his return;

    (ii) in case of goods imported into Pakistan, he holds bill of entry or goods declaration in his name and showing his sales tax registration number, duly cleared by the customs under section 79, section 81 or section 104 of the Customs Act, 1969 (IV of 1969);

    (iii) in case of goods purchased in auction, he holds a treasury challan, in his name and bearing his registration number, showing payment of sales tax;

    Sub-Section (3): Notwithstanding anything in sub-sections (1) and (2), the Federal Government may, by a special order, subject to such conditions, limitations or restrictions as may be specified therein allow a registered person to deduct input tax paid by him from the output tax determined or to be determined as due from him under this Act.

    Sub-Section (4): Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or rules made there under, the Federal Government may, by notification in the official Gazette, subject to such conditions, limitations or restrictions as may be specified therein, allow a registered person or class of persons to deduct such amount of input tax from the output tax as may be specified in the said notification.