Category: Budget 2020-2021

  • Adjustable advance income tax recommended on sale of agri produce

    Adjustable advance income tax recommended on sale of agri produce

    KARACHI: The tax authorities have been recommended to collect adjustable advance income tax on sale of agriculture produce in order to broaden tax base.

    Overseas Investors Chamber of Commerce and Industry (OICCI) in its proposals for provincial budget 2020/2021 submitted to Sindh government, recommended that adjustable withholding tax should be introduced on sale of agricultural produce, such as sugar cane, wheat, cotton and others.

    The OICCI said that as per the constitution of Pakistan, right of taxing income lies with the federal government except income from agriculture which is taxable under the respective provincial laws.

    Agriculture related activities contribute approximately 20 percent of the overall national production. However, the collection of agricultural income tax is estimated to be even less than 1 percent of total collection of Federal and Provincial taxes.

    The disparities in tax levies between different incomes segments need to be addressed.

    “Therefore Sindh government/revenue authorities should take appropriate measures to increase revenue collection from the agriculture sector.”

    The original rationale of keeping agriculture out of tax net to facilitate small agriculturists is not applicable, due to non-implementation of land reforms, and the benefit of the tax exemption is being availed, as per common perception, by big landowners earning huge incomes and unscrupulous elements by transfer of income and wealth to businesses fronting as agriculture sector.

    Some of the key issues related to agriculture income are identified as follows:

    Principle of Non-Discrimination: In principle, income from all sources, including agriculture, if exceeding the minimum threshold applicable for other sources of income should be taxed without any discrimination.

    Determination Basis: A transparent, easily understandable and applicable manner of determining such income should be designed.

    Flexible Income Based System: The current agricultural income tax has effectively become a land tax, based on land holding, that leads to the perception that there is no tax on agricultural activities.

    Identification and Linkage with National Tax Number: There is no identification of even the small number of agricultural income taxpayers as they are not on the national tax number (NTN) system.

    The OICCI recommended:

    Income Based System: At present, tax is payable on ‘land holding’ or ‘net income’ whichever is higher. However, the manner of determination of net income is complicated and therefore in almost 100 percent of the cases tax is received on land holding basis. Therefore taxability of income on land holding should be abolished and taxes collected on ‘net income basis’.

    There are only around 10 to 15 agencies and enterprises which acquire such crops. The advance tax should be adjustable against income tax payable on net income basis. Rates of withholding and the threshold for the same should be aligned with other products – for example any payment exceeding Rs 25,000 should be subject to advance tax at the rate of 1 to 3 percent as the case may be. Federal taxation system may be used for such collection on behalf of the provincial government in the same manner as is being done in other cases by the provincial government.

    Link and Interface with the National Tax Number: All persons holding land should be required to obtain a Provincial Tax Number (PTN), like the NTM maintained by FBR, modified by adding one or two digits so as to identify that source of income is agriculture.

    Definition of Agricultural Activity: Definition of agricultural income should be amended to include all agricultural activities like non-corporate dairy farming, poultry etc.

    Rent for the Use of Agricultural Land: Under the specific provision, the rent for use of agricultural land, which is general practice, especially for large landowners, is an agriculture income. There is effectively no mechanism to ensure completeness of recovery of taxes from such receipts. Such rent income should be subject to same rate of tax as is currently in vogue on property income under the FBR system.

  • Changes to CNIC condition likely in budget

    Changes to CNIC condition likely in budget

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) may introduce changes to mandatory CNIC (Computerized National Identity Card) condition in the upcoming budget 2020/2021 in to facilitate registered taxpayers.

    At present unregistered purchasers, excluding end-consumers, of above Rs50,000 are required to provide a copy of CNIC in order bring the sales into the documented economy.

    The business community raised concern over the low purchase limit. The sources said that the FBR is considering to enhance the limit to Rs200,000.

    In the last budget the government made it mandatory for registered persons to obtain CNIC of unregistered person at the time of sale above Rs50,000.

    The amendment was brought to Section 8 and Section 23 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 under which in case of invoices issued without CNIC or National Tax Number (NTN) of buyer, related input tax was disallowed on prorate basis except in cases where supplies are made to end consumers not exceeding Rs. 50,000.

    Condition of providing CNIC number of buyers on invoices, to claim input tax adjustment, have benefitted unorganized sector more than the already documented sector.

    Due to the condition, buyers prefer to purchase from unregistered suppliers as they do not ask for CNIC numbers. On the other hand, registered persons and corporate entities, who were already facing resistance from buyers for charging sales tax and further tax, have been facing severe deterrence from buyers who are resisting provision of CNIC numbers.

    Consequently, the compliant taxpayers are forced to either provide CNICs of their employees, relatives, truck drivers, etc. or to shut down their businesses as they are at a competitive disadvantage with the unorganized sector.

    This condition has also encouraged cash economy as taxpayers have been withdrawing their money from banks and are dealing in cash only.

    According to a report despite massive changes in sales tax laws in Finance Act 2019 to force and mandate sales tax registration and filing of sales tax returns, there is only about 7 percent annual increase in sales tax returns filed from 146,922 return filers in June 2019 to 158,206 in December 2019.

    Out of 11,284 additional returns, only 2,769.are payment returns while rest is Nil and Null returns.

    The condition of CNIC on unregistered sales has been introduced in the Finance Act 2019 but it was not implemented in July 2019. While, from August 2019 to January 2020, the condition was relaxed through agreement between shopkeepers and FBR.

    The FBR sources said that business community had also recommended changes in provisions related to CNIC conditions.

    Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) in its proposals for budget 2020/2021 suggested to enhance the purchase limit to Rs100,000.

    It also pointed out that CNIC condition has been causing cashflow issues since its implementation which will further intensify during the current pandemic of CoVid-19, especially for registered taxpayers.

    Therefore, the FPCCI sought a general amnesty through legislation in the next budget regarding CNIC condition for the whole tax year 2020 starting from August 2019 to June 2020.

  • Tax credit for final, minimum regimes may be withdrawn

    Tax credit for final, minimum regimes may be withdrawn

    ISLAMABAD: The tax authorities may withdraw tax credit available to taxpayers falling in final and minimum tax regimes, sources in Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) said.

    The sources said that the Large Taxpayers Unit (LTU) Karachi has submitted its proposals for budget 2020/2021 and recommended withdrawal of tax credit for final tax and minimum tax regimes.

    The sources said that the elimination of tax credit likely to generate Rs5 billion during the next fiscal year.

    The LTU Karachi suggested amendment in Section 65B, 65D and 65E of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 to withdraw tax credit for taxpayers falling in minimum tax and final taxation.

    The LTU Karachi said that allowing tax credits against minimum tax and final taxes payable under the Ordinance is against the principal of fairness and final tax regime.

    It further said that the withdrawal of tax credit to such taxpayers would help the revenue body to get additional Rs5 billion during the next fiscal year.

  • FBR advised to allow examination before filing GDs

    FBR advised to allow examination before filing GDs

    KARACHI: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has been advised to allow examination/ weighment should be allowed before filing goods declaration (GDs) in order to verify contents of containers.

    Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) in its proposals for budget 2020/2021 submitted to the FBR said that as per proviso of para 1 Section 79 of Customs Act, 1969, in case of used goods, before filing of goods declaration, the owner can make a request to an officer of customs to permit the owner to examine the goods and thereafter make entry of such goods by filing a goods declaration.

    “As per KYOTO Convention of WCO guidelines Standard 3.9 “Before lodging the goods declaration the declarant shall be allowed, under such conditions as may be laid by the customs (a) to inspect the goods; and (b) to draw samples,” the FPCCI said.

    The apex trade body proposed that examination / weighment may be allowed before filing of goods declaration, in all cases, where the owner is in doubt about the contents of the consignment, especially in cases of machinery, fabrics, article of plastic and food items etc.

    “Keeping in view the above facts, the weighment / examination before filing of goods declaration may be allowed for all class of goods,” the FPCCI advised.

    The FPCCI also highlighted an issue related to time duration related to decision of cases as heavy demurrages were hampering economic activities.

    The FPCCI said that as per sub-section 3 of Section 179 of Customs Act 1969 (IV of 1969) the cases are required to be decided within 90 days of the issuance of show cause notice or within such period extended by the collector for which reason shall be recorded in writing, but such extended period shall in no case exceed sixty days.

    The FPCCI proposed that the period specified to decide the cases under sub-section 3 of section 179 should be fifteen working days instead of existing period i.e. 90 days and further the extended period of 60 days should be reduced to 07 working days as an estimated cost Rs.15000 to 20000 per day is incurred on a 40 ft container.

    Therefore, to reduce the cost of doing business and trade facilitation the cases should be decided within 15 working days.

  • FPCCI demands elimination of discretionary powers of tax officials

    FPCCI demands elimination of discretionary powers of tax officials

    KARACHI: Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) has demanded withdrawal of discretionary powers of tax officials including multiple selection of audit and entering business premises.

    Mian Anjum Nisar, President and Zakaria Usman, Convener, Budget Advisory Council of the FPCCI urged the FBR to withdraw the discretionary powers vested with the tax officials to avoid their misuse, provide relief to the taxpayers, simplify taxation law and restore the diminishing confidence of the assessees in the taxation laws – a pre-requisite for success of any scheme.

    The proposal is made as a part of the FPCCI presentation being made to the concerned quarters including Dr. Hafeez Shaikh, Advisor to the PM on Finance and Revenue, Razak Dawood, Adviser to PM for Commerce, Textile and Investment and Nausheen Javaid Amjad, Chairperson, FBR for incorporation in the forthcoming Federal Budget 2020-2021.

    He added that the FPCCI after identifying a series of such provisions vesting discretionary powers had given concrete proposals to safeguard the interest of the taxpayers against the misuse of discretionary powers.

    Regarding discretionary powers of conducting Multiple Audits / Amendment of Assessment under Sections 177, 214C and 122of Income Tax Ordinance, they elaborated, “Although a return filed, U/S 114 of ITO 2001, within time limit does qualify for Universal Self-Assessment Scheme (USAS) and considered to be Assessment Order deemed to have been passed U/S 120(1) of the Ordinance on the date of filing the return, but even then it may be amended as many times as may be necessary by the Inland Revenue officials within 5 years from the end of the financial year in which the return is filed which results in multiple tax assessments”.

    They therefore, proposed that the power to select the return of income may rest only with the FBR who is already having the powers to select the audit cases randomly through Computer U/S 214C of the Ordinance.

    However, they added, “In case where definite evidence is available with the department then the audit be initiated upto the transaction in question only”.

    These discretionary powers provide sufficient incentives to the Inland Revenue Officials to serve Audit Notices to the commercial importers and other such assessees who have already discharged their tax liability as full and final at the time of clearance of goods at customs stage and as such promote direct contact between a taxpayer and tax officials which is against the government policy as it encourage tax evasion and corruption.

    The FPCCI Chief Mian Anjum Nisar also lamented posting of Inland Revenue Officer at Business Premises under Section 40B of Sales Tax Act, 1990 to monitor production, sales of goods, stock position etc as it is out dated and unnecessary in the modern era of computerization and available methods of monitoring the entire production and supply chain.

    He argued, “It gives a perception of anti-business and anti-investment government policies, creates harassment and tantamount to revival of supervise clearance scheme of Central Excise in Sales Tax Act, 1990”.

  • PBC Advocates Abolishing Anti-Dumping Duty on Raw Material Used for Exports

    PBC Advocates Abolishing Anti-Dumping Duty on Raw Material Used for Exports

    KARACHI: Pakistan Business Council (PBC) has advocated abolishing anti-dumping duty on imported raw material that are used for export oriented units (EOU).

    (more…)
  • Hafeez Shaikh directs FBR to collect data for effective budget making

    Hafeez Shaikh directs FBR to collect data for effective budget making

    ISLAMABAD: Adviser to the Prime Minister on Finance and Revenue Dr. Abdul Hafeez Shaikh on Monday directed the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to collect data for effective budget making for year 2020/2021.

    Dr. Hafeez Shaikh chaired a meeting at the Finance Division through video link with Dr. Ikram-ul-Haq to discuss proposals on improving the tax structure of the country with the help of effective data gathering and reconciliation mechanism.

    He directed FBR to collect data through multiple sources that may be best used for effective budget making exercise.

    Chairman FBR, Secretary Finance and ex-secretary Finance Dr. Waqar Massoud Khan were also present during the meeting.

    The adviser appreciated the work done by Dr. Ikramul- Haq for gathering data across the country from selected markets and from different chambers of commerce and Industry.

    Dr. Ikram shared with the adviser the important inferences from data gathering exercise and suggested certain techniques for data reconciliation that could improve tax collection in a more effective manner.

    The adviser said that the basic purpose of this exercise is to consult experts to seek suggestions and insights so that the fundamental problems of the tax collection system in the country could be effectively addressed.

    He said that as we are preparing the next budget, we should be more vigilant, practical and analyze the opportunities and challenges offered by the current environment.

    The Government is ready to listen to all stakeholders to prepare a budget which is according to the need of the prevailing economic circumstances and innovative in providing solutions to the structural problems of the economy.

    He asked the Expert to firm up his proposals in concise and doable manner and share the draft as early as possible with the ministry so that these proposals could be well incorporated in the upcoming budget.

  • FBR proposed to ensure CPR for deposited withholding tax

    FBR proposed to ensure CPR for deposited withholding tax

    KARACHI: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has been advised to ensure Computerized Payment Receipt (CPR) for deposited withholding tax in order to avert chances of revenue leakages.

    Pakistan Business Council (PBC) in its proposals for budget 2020/2021 submitted to the FBR, said that presently the taxpayer has to deposit the withholding tax deducted fortnightly, i.e. within seven days from the end of each week ending on every Sunday.

    In addition, certain WHT agent do not deposit on time and some agents do not deposit at all. This also includes agencies/govt. organizations in respect of withholding tax, where CPR is not provided hence revenue leakages to government in the absence of withholding tax deposit.

    On the other hand, where withholding tax is deducted by agencies/government organization, but do not provide system (IRIS) generated CPR as they do not enter in the system. Therefore assesse cannot get input benefit due to non-availability of CPR from IRIS system on account of withholding tax in spite of reminders.

    The PBC recommended that timeline of 7 to 13 days should be extended to one week after the month.

    Besides, IRIS system should be applicable for all with holding agent including agencies/government organizations and CPR in respect of withholding tax facing authority should be available from IRIS.

    This will help in ease of doing business and facilitate withholding tax agents.

    Furhter, the proposed amendment will help in controling revenue leakages as well as assesse can claim input tax properly.

    Thus neither it is loss to authority nor the assesse. In the absence of non-availability of CPR , this is an extra cost for doing business.

  • FBR advised to amend withholding tax on prize winnings

    FBR advised to amend withholding tax on prize winnings

    KARACHI: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has been advised to amend the income tax law related to withholding tax deduction on prize winnings.

    Pakistan Business Council (PBC) in its budget proposals for 2020/2021 submitted to the FBR said that under Section 156 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 requires a company to deduct 20 percent tax on “prize offered by companies for promotion of sale”.

    The PBC suggested amended in the Section 156 that every person paying prize of prize bonds, or winning from a raffle, lottery, prize on winning a quiz, prize offered by companies for promotion of sale to end consumers, or cross-word puzzle shall deduct tax.

    The PBC said that the clear intention of this section is to capture tax through withholding at source from persons who are recipients of these prizes or winnings; the intention is not to tax any person who belongs to the supply chain of the companies who offer prize for promotion of sales.

    The income of the supply chain i.e. dealers, distributors is subjected to withholding tax in the shape of withholding taxes imposed under separate withholding regimes.

    It is therefore suggested that to clear any ambiguity in law regarding application of this section, it may be amended to add the term “end consumers” to oust any person in the supply chain from the ambit of this section.

  • Corporate, super tax rates should be aligned for banks

    Corporate, super tax rates should be aligned for banks

    KARACHI: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has been proposed to bring down the corporate tax rate for banks at par with other corporate sector and also treatment of super tax for banking companies aligned with other taxpayers.

    The banks are paying 35 percent income tax whereas the corporate tax rate for other sectors is 29 percent. Likewise, super tax at four percent is applicable on banks.

    Overseas Investors Chamber of Commerce and Industry (OICCI) in its budget proposals for 2020/2021 submitted to the FBR, highlighted that the banking sector tax rates are not aligned with the general corporate tax rates.

    Furthermore, through Finance Supplementary (Second Amendment) Bill 2019, Super Tax at 4 percent is made applicable on banks from tax year 2018 to tax year 2021.

    The OICCI recommended that corporate tax rates for the banking sector should be aligned with other sectors.

    Meanwhile, super tax relief, as granted to other industries, should be given to banking sector as well.

    The OICCI also highlighted tax deduction on profit on debt under section 151 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.

    Through Circular No.1/2-STB/2019 dated 26th July 2019, FBR has clarified that withholding tax under section 151 shall be deducted on the basis of cumulative profit paid in a tax year.

    The circular is in contradiction with the Act, which requires that withholding tax shall be deducted on payment basis.

    The circular should be withdrawn, to avoid litigation between banks and department.

    There should be a uniform withholding tax rate of 15 percent for all payments of profit on debt.

    The OICCI pointed out Section 165 and 165A of Income Tax Ordinance 2001related to submission of statements and information by the banks.

    The Clause (81A) of Part IV to the Second Schedule was inserted vide the Finance (Second Amendment) Act 2019 to exclude the reporting requirements under section 165 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 with respect to withholding tax under section 151 (Profit on Debt) and 231A (Cash Withdrawal) since both the withholding sections are required to be reported under section 165A.

    The clause was abolished vide Finance Act 2019, resulting in duplication of reporting i.e. withholding tax under section 151 and 231A has to be reported, with a threshold, under section 165A on monthly basis and again under section 165 on bi-annual basis, but without any threshold i.e., withholding tax of even Re 1 has to be reported under section 165A.

    Therefore, the OICCI recommended that Clause (81A) of Part IV to the Second Schedule should be restored to avoid duplication of reporting and handling of voluminous data for immaterial withholding tax transactions, which is not clear.

    Alternatively, reporting requirement of section 165A for both these sections (151 and 231A) should be deleted to avoid double reporting.