Category: Taxation

Pakistan Revenue delivers the latest taxation news, covering income tax, sales tax, and customs duty. Stay updated with insights on tax policies, regulations, and financial developments in Pakistan.

  • Customs law amended to recover unpaid amount from exporters

    Customs law amended to recover unpaid amount from exporters

    KARACHI: The government has put a check on exporters related to unpaid amount of duty and taxes at the time of export clearance and amended law to recover the same.

    Through Finance Bill 2019, it is proposed to amend Section 32(3)(A) of Customs Act, 1969 to apply this check on exporters.

    Sub-section (3A) of Section 32 deals with the issuance of show cause notice in the situation where any duty, taxes or charge has not been levied, short-levied or erroneously refunded, discovered as a result of an audit or examination of an importer’s accounts or by any other means.

    The Finance Bill 2019 seeks to extend the application of this section to exporters as well.

    The existing law under Section 32(3)(A) said:

    Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (3), where any duty, taxes or charge has not been levied or has been short-levied or has been erroneously refunded and this is discovered as a result of an audit or examination of an importer’s accounts or by any means other than an examination of the documents provided by the importer at the time the goods were imported, the person liable to pay any amount on that account shall be served with a notice within five years of the relevant date requiring him to show cause why he should not pay the amount specified in the notice:

    Provided that if the recoverable amount in a case is less than one hundred rupees, the Customs authorities shall not initiate the aforesaid action.

  • FBR empowered to impose fee, service charges under Customs laws

    FBR empowered to impose fee, service charges under Customs laws

    KARACHI: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has been empowered to impose service charges and date of determination of rate of import duty under Customs Act 1969.

    The Finance Bill 2019 has proposed delegation of powers from federal government to the FBR, which included: levy of fee and service charges; date of determination of rate of import duty; date of determination of rate of duty for clearance through the Customs Computerized System; and date for determination of rate of duty on goods exported.

    The bill proposed delegation powers to FBR under Section 18D, 30, 30A and 31 of Customs Act, 1969.

    Presently Section 18D of Customs Act, 1969 states:

    18D. Levy of fee and service charges.- The Federal Government may, by notification in the official Gazette, subject to such conditions, limitations or restrictions as it may deem fit to impose, levy fee and service charges for examination, scanning, inspections, sealing and desealing, valuation check or in respect of any other service or control mechanism provided by any formation under the control of the Board, including ventures of public-private partnership, at such rates as may be specified in the notification.

    Presently Section 30 of Customs Act, 1969 states:

    30. Date of determination of rate of import duty.- The rate of duty applicable to any imported goods shall be the rate of duty in force;

    (a) in the case of goods cleared for home consumption under section 79, on the date on which a goods declaration is manifested under that section; and

    (b) in the case of goods cleared from a warehouse under section 104, on the date on which a goods declaration for clearance of such goods is manifested under that section:

    Provided that, where a goods declaration has been manifested in advance of the arrival of the conveyance by which the goods have been imported, the relevant date for the purposes of this section shall be the date on which the manifest of the conveyance is delivered at the port of first entry:

    Provided further that, in respect of goods for the clearance of which a goods declaration for clearance has been manifested under section 104, and the duty is not paid within seven days of the goods declaration being manifested, the rate of duty applicable shall be the rate of duty on the date on which the duty is actually paid:

    Provided further that in case of the goods illegally removed from the warehouse, the rate of duty shall be the rate prevalent either on the date of in-bonding or detection of case or date of payment of the duty and taxes, whichever is higher:

    Provided further that in case of exercising option for redemption of fine in lieu of confiscation of the goods seized during anti-smuggling operations, the rate of duty shall be the rate prevalent either on the date of seizure or date of payment of duty and taxes, whichever is higher:

    Provided further that the Federal Government may, by notification in the official Gazette, for any goods or class of goods, specify any other date for the determination of rate of duty.

    Explanation:- For the purpose of this section “manifested” means that when a machine number is allocated to goods declaration and is registered in Customs record.

    Presently Section 30A of Customs Act, 1969 states:

    30A. Date of determination of rate of duty for clearance through the Customs Computerized System.- Subject to the provisions of section 155A, the rate of duty applicable to any imported or exported goods if cleared through the Customs Computerized System, shall be the rate of duty in force on;-

    (a) the date of payment of duty;

    (b) in case the goods are not chargeable to duty, the date on which the goods declaration is filed with Customs.

    Provided that where a goods declaration has been filed in advance of the arrival of the conveyance by which the goods have been imported, the relevant date for the purposes of this section shall be the date on which the manifest of the conveyance is filed at the customs-station of first entry:

    Provided further that the Federal Government may, by notification in the official Gazette, specify any other date for the determination of rate of duty in respect of any goods or class of goods.

    Presently Section 31 of Customs Act, 1969 states:

    31. Date for determination of rate of duty on goods exported.- The rate and amount of duty applicable to any goods exported shall be the rate and amount chargeable at the time of the delivery of the goods declaration under section 131:

    Provided that where the export of any goods is permitted without a goods declaration or in anticipation of the delivery of such a declaration, the rate and amount of duty applicable shall be the rate and amount chargeable on the date on which loading of the goods on the outgoing conveyance commences:

    Provided further that the Federal Government may, by notification in the official Gazette, for any goods or class of goods, specify any other date for determination of the rate of duty.

  • Collectors’ power to determine customs values withdrawn

    Collectors’ power to determine customs values withdrawn

    KARACHI: The government has withdrawn the power of Collector of Customs in determination of customs value on his own motion through Finance Bill 2019.

    The Finance Bill 2019 proposed to withdraw the powers of the collector of customs to determine customs valuations on his motion under Section 25A(1) and Section 25A(3) of Customs Act, 1969.

    The collector of customs presently has powers to determine the customs values under Section 25A.

    The sub-section 1 of Section 25A states: Notwithstanding the provisions contained in section 25, the Collector of Customs on his own motion, or the Director of Customs Valuation on his own motion or on a reference made to him by any person or an officer of Customs, may determine the customs value of any goods or category of goods imported into or exported out of Pakistan, after following the methods laid down in section 25, whichever is applicable.

    The sub-section 3 of Section 25A states: In case of any conflict in the customs value determined under sub-section (1), the Director-General of Customs Valuation shall determine the applicable customs value.

    The powers of determining customs values have now been proposed to be available with Director of Customs Valuation.

    Analysts said that this proposal in the Finance Bill 2019 would provide relief to import in clearance of consignments. They said that many arbitrary decisions of Collector have created hassles for the importers in the past and consignments were stuck up for a long time.

  • MCC Appraisement East announces auction of confiscated vehicles on June 17

    MCC Appraisement East announces auction of confiscated vehicles on June 17

    KARACHI: Model Customs Collectorate (MCC) Appraisement East has announced public auction of confiscated vehicles on June 17, 2019 at Anti-Smuggling Organization (ASO) Office, Ghasbandar Kemari, Karachi.

    Following vehicles will be presented for auction:

    1. Mitsubishi Pajero Jeep (used), Reg.GS-2000, Model-1994,Chassis -V46-4034791/Engine-4M4D EXT T7UF.

    2. Used Toyota Lexus Car, Reg no UC-868, Model 2006(as per seat belt), Chassis JTHBG963905034702/Engine EMH-3 GR-FE158467-3485cc.

    3. Used Toyota Harrier Jeep, Reg no JAA-454, Model -1998-2999cc,Chassis no MCU-10-0013510, Engine no IMZ-FE6688090.

    4. Used Honda Saloon Accord Car, Reg no-BFT-418, Model-2003, 1990cc, Chassis no-CL7-3006339, Engine No-33101802.

    5. Used Mercedes Benz (AG), Reg No-AB-1001, Model-1991-02, 2999cc, Chassis no-WDB1240312B476728.

    6. Used Toyota Mark-II Saloon Car, Reg No-BVL-708, Model-2000, 1800HP, Chassis no-JZX110-6000922, Engine No-1JZ-075010.

    7. Used Toyota AXIO-X Car-White Colour, Reg No-BFE-068, 1496cc, Model-2007, Chassis no-NZE-141-6028039, Engine no, INZ-C0360547.

    8. Used Toyota Land Cruiser Jeep-Silver Colour, Reg No-BG-1131, Model No-1989, 3400cc, Chassis No-BJ60-023765, Engine No, 3B-1098887( As Per Reg Book) Diesel.

    9. Used Toyota Saloon Car XE, Model no-1999, 1500cc, Colour Red, Chassis No-AE-100-5171778, Engine-SA-FE-1500cc.

    10. Used Toyota Premio Saloon Car, Reg No-BFM-306, Model No-2004, Chassis No-AZT240-0017447, Engine No- 1AZ -4802097.

    11. Used Toyota Mark-X Car, Reg No- BBC-301, Model No-200used5, Chassis No-GRX-120-0042956, Engine No- 4GR-FSE-2499cc.

    12. Used Toyota Crown Royal Saloon (G) Car, Reg no- BEZ-998, Model 2005, Chassis No. GRS 182-1015624, Engine no 0123426-2994cc.

    13. Used Toyota Land Cruiser Jeep, Reg no. LEB-06-2007, Model 1996-2982cc-silver colour, Chassis No VZ95-0004948, Engine No. IKZC679955.

    14. Used Toyota Premio Car, Model 2005, Reg No. AAQ-945-Qta, Chassis No ZZT-240-5041761, Engine No. 1ZZFE-2200724, 1794cc, white colour.

    15. Used Toyota Surf Jeep, Model 2007, Reg no- BF-9925, Chassis No TRN210-0002425, Engine no 2TR-0341543, 2697cc, tearl white.

    16. Used Toyota Land Cruiser Jeep, Model 2004, Reg no JAG-345, chassis no KDJ121-0001884, Engine no 1KD-1184169,2982cc.

    17. Used Toyota Land Cruiser Jeep, Model-2003, Reg no BF-8255, Chassis no UZJ100-0144369, Engine no 2UZ-FE9091472, 4700cc, white.

    18. Used Mercedes Benz Saloon Car, Model-2007, chassis no WDD2193222A117436, Engine no 64292040471958, 3200cc, Black.

  • Commissioners IR empowered to conduct audit of taxpayers every year

    Commissioners IR empowered to conduct audit of taxpayers every year

    KARACHI: Commissioners of Inland Revenue have been empowered to conduct audit of a registered taxpayer every year after removal of restriction through Finance Bill 2019.

    Through Finance Act, 2018 a restriction was imposed on offices of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) under which they would conduct audit of taxpayers once in every three years.

    However, the Finance Bill 2019 proposed to delete the proviso which was introduced through Finance Act last year.

    Experts at EY Ford Rhodes Chartered Accountants said that certain taxpayers challenged the audit proceedings under Section 25 where sales tax audit had already been conducted during any of the last three years on the premise that the amendment introduced through the Finance Act, 2018 was procedural change in law and was applicable retrospectively.

    Recently, the Honorable Lahore High Court has adjudged the matter in favor of the taxpayer. It appears that the proposed deletion of the third proviso to Section 25 will neutralize the judgment of the Honorable Lahore High Court.

  • Commercial importers to file income returns after removal of FTR

    Commercial importers to file income returns after removal of FTR

    ISLAMABAD: Commercial importers will require to file return of income and statement of assets to the tax authorities after the removal of final tax regime.

    Tax authorities said that the commercial importers would require to submit details of imports and source of payment for opening the letter of credit (LCs) through their returns.

    According to budget commentary by EY Ford Rhodes on Finance Bill, 2019, before the Finance Act, 2018, tax required to be collected under Section 148 on import of plastic raw material imported by an industrial undertaking, falling under PCT headings 39.01 to 39.12, edible oils and packing material is treated as minimum tax.

    Furthermore, tax required to be collected on import of goods that are sold in the same condition as they were when imported was treated as final tax.

    The Finance Act, 2018 brought a substantive conceptual shift with respect to taxation of commercial importers whereby such tax collection was deemed to be “minimum tax” in respect of such importers.

    Due to the aforesaid change in taxability of commercial importers, there were grave concerns shown by the above sector, as this change would have required the commercial importers to declare the financial results for comparison of tax on profits to the minimum tax on imports.

    As a result of strong lobbying by commercial importers, amendments were made in Section 148 through the Finance Supplementary (Second Amendment) Act, 2019 whereby tax collected at import stage from commercial importers was again treated as final discharge of tax liability of such importers.

    “The Finance Bill 2019 now proposes to restore the position as stood after the amendments made through the Finance Act, 2018 to change the character of such tax collection from “final tax” to “minimum tax”.

    “Such commercial importers, pursuant to the proposed amendments will now be required to file a return of income instead of filing a statement in terms of Section 115 of the Ordinance.”

    The Bill also proposes amendments in Sub-section (8A) of Section 148 whereby tax collected at the time of import of ships by ship-breakers is also to be treated as ‘minimum tax’.

  • Finance Bill 2019: CGT on immovable properties revamped

    Finance Bill 2019: CGT on immovable properties revamped

    ISLAMABAD: The capital gain tax on the immovable properties has been revamped through Finance Bill 2019 in order to streamline taxation on gains at the time of sale of immovable properties.

    According to commentary of EY Ford Rhodes Chartered Accountants on changes brought in Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 through Finance Bill 2019, the taxation of capital gains arising from disposal of capital assets is governed by Section 37 of the Ordinance.

    After the introduction of Eighteenth Amendment in the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, the Finance Act, 2012 introduced a significant amendment inserting Sub-section (1A) in Section 37 of the Ordinance providing for taxation of capital gains arising from disposal of immovable properties.

    The rates of tax on such capital gains were applicable depending on the holding period of immovable properties ranging from 5 percent to 10 percent.

    However, if the immovable property was disposed of after holding period of three years, the rate of tax is prescribed at zero percent.

    “The Bill proposes to revamp the taxation of capital gains from disposal of immovable properties.”

    Accordingly, it is proposed to omit Sub-section (1A) from Section 37 along with Division VIII of Part I of the First Schedule which contains rates of tax on such capital gains.

    In its place, a new Sub-section (3A) is proposed to be inserted which contains separate mechanisms for computation of capital gain on disposal of (i) open plot, and (ii) constructed property.

    The effect of the proposed amendment is that such capital gain (worked out by subtracting cost of the asset from the consideration received) will not be considered as a separate block of income liable to tax at reduced rates of 5 percent, 7.5 percent or 10 percent.

    It will instead forms part of total income of the person and therefore, be taxed at the normal rates of tax applicable as per the First Schedule.

    The capital gain will, however, be reduced by 25 percent depending on the holding period of the immovable property disposed of.

    The reduction of 25 percent will apply if the holding period of open plot exceeds one year but does not exceed ten years and for constructed property from one year to five years.

    Where the immovable property is disposed of after holding period of ten years and five years respectively, the capital gain will be taken to be zero.

    An interesting outcome of this mode of taxation is that where the capital gain becomes zero depending upon the holding period as discussed above, super tax under Section 4B of the Ordinance will not apply for, there would not be any income recognizable for the purpose of computation of super tax.

    The reduction of 50 percent of tax payable in respect of capital gains on disposal of immovable property on the first sale of immovable property acquired or allotted to ex-servicemen and serving personnel of Armed Forces or ex-employees or serving personnel of Federal and Provincial Governments, being original allottees of the immovable property, duly certified by the allotment authority remains intact as for this purpose Clause (9A) is also proposed to be inserted in Part III of the Second Schedule to the Ordinance.

  • Finance Bill 2019: Money withheld of persons not appearing on ATL to be treated as unexplained

    Finance Bill 2019: Money withheld of persons not appearing on ATL to be treated as unexplained

    ISLAMABAD: The government has taken harsh stance against persons having taxable income but not on the tax roll.

    In this regard the law has been introduced under which persons not appearing on the Active Taxpayers List (ATL) and their amount withheld on transactions will be treated as unexplained.

    Commissioners of Inland Revenue, Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) have been empowered to make assessment of income of such persons and issue notices.

    A budget commentary issued by EY Ford Rhodes Chartered Accountants said that the concept of filers and non-filers was introduced in the Ordinance through the Finance Act, 2014.

    Through this concept a distinction was created between person who duly filed their tax returns and the remaining persons who were considered non-filers.

    The basic intention of the legislature was to obtain documentation and compel the non-filers to become registered tax filers.

    Over the years, major distinction was introduced in the rates of tax withholding under various sections of the Ordinance to make the non-filers suffer heavy withholding of tax so that they may be compelled to ultimately come within the tax net and file proper declaration of their tax returns with FBR.

    However, over the last five years, it has been observed that the percentage of increase in tax filers has not been significant and the numbers of tax filers is still quite low as compared to other comparable economies.

    The present government has been talking about broadening of the tax base more strongly and the Prime Minister himself has on many occasions indicated his strong desire to significantly broaden the tax base.

    It is now proposed to enact a separate schedule in the Ordinance to deal with persons who are not on the ATL i.e. who are not in the tax net and are not filing their declaration so far.

    In this connection, Section 100BA has been proposed which governs the collection or deduction of advance income tax, computation of income and tax payable by such persons.

    The Tenth Schedule generally provides that where ever tax is required to be deducted or collected under any provisions of the Ordinance from a person whose name is not appearing in the ATL, the rate of withholding will be doubled in case of deduction or collection from such persons.

    However, the schedule provides exception in case of the following payments –

    (1) Salary;

    (2) Payment to non-residents other than on account of royalty, fees for technical service, insurance premium

    (3) Payment to a Permanent Establishment in Pakistan of a non-resident person other than on account of providing services or contract or any general payment to a non-resident.

    (4) Payment on account of exports

    (5) Tax deductions from payment of rent

    (6) Tax deductions from withdrawal of balance from pension funds

    (7) Tax collection from cash withdrawal from a bank

    (8) Tax collection on banking transactions

    (9) Collection of tax by NCCPL

    (10) Collection of tax on domestic or commercial electricity consumption

    (11) Tax collection from steel melters

    (12) Purchase of air tickets

    (13) Functions and gatherings

    (14) Cable operators

    (15) Educational institutions

    (16) Dealers and commission agents

    (17) Purchase of international air tickets

    (18) Non-cash banking transactions

    (19) Payment for use of machinery and equipment

    (20) Remittance of education related expenses

    (21) Extractions of minerals

    (22) Tobacco

    The Schedule seeks to provide a mechanism where a withholding agent is satisfied that the person not appearing in the ATL is not required to be a tax filer and hence the deduction of tax should not be attracted from payments to such persons.

    In such a situation, the payer would be required to furnish an application to the Commissioner in writing electronically providing the details of the person from whom he intends not to collect tax, giving details about the payee and the nature of payment and the basis on which he is not liable to be a tax filer.

    The Commissioner on such application would decide the matter within 30 days and direct the payer accordingly.

    Assessment of such person

    — The Schedule requires the Commissioner to undertake a provisional assessment of the person from whom tax has been withheld under the Schedule but he has failed to file the return of income within the prescribed time or extended time.

    — The provisional assessment is proposed to be carried out within 60 days of the due date of filing of return. The income of such person in such a case shall be imputed on the basis of tax that has been withheld at source and shall be treated as un-explained income.

    — Once the provisional assessment has been finalized and served on such person, he can file a return of income within 45 days of the service of the provisional order. In which case the provisional assessment shall stands abated.

    — If a return of income is not filed within 45 days of service of order of provisional assessment, then such assessment is to be treated as final assessment order. In such a case the Commissioner is also proposed to be empowered to pass an order within 30 days of finalization of assessment for imposition of penalty on account of non-furnishing of return and concealment of income.

    — The Schedule also seeks to empower the Commissioner to amend an assessment on the basis of definite information from an audit or otherwise.

    Consequent to the proposed enactment of the Schedule, to withdraw concept of filers and non-filers from various provisions of the Ordinance, several amendments have been proposed in various withholding provisions to remove reference to Filer and non-Filer.

    Similarly the restrictions introduced on purchase of immovable property and moveable property on Non-filers in Section 227C are also proposed to be abolished.

  • Finance Bill 2019: Law prohibits FBR officials from taking action against amnesty declarants

    Finance Bill 2019: Law prohibits FBR officials from taking action against amnesty declarants

    ISLAMABAD – The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has formally restricted its officials from initiating any proceedings against individuals who availed the Tax Amnesty Scheme under the Assets Declaration Act, 2019.

    (more…)
  • Customs initiates examining exporters to check under-invoicing, mis-declaration

    Customs initiates examining exporters to check under-invoicing, mis-declaration

    KARACHI: Pakistan Customs has initiated examination of exporters’ profiles to check mis-declaration and under-invoicing for plugging revenue leakages.

    A statement said on Friday that the chairman of Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) Shabbar Zaidi had directed to identify the extent of mis-invoicing in export declarations in order to ascertain the suspected items or sectors and destinations for such mis-declaration, and to categorize exporters on the basis of risk profiling by segregating compliant exporters from those engaged in mis-invoicing.

    The Customs Operations wing has tasked the Director General Customs Valuation to submit a report in this regard.

    It has been further directed to develop a risk based system to intercept this trend without compromising export facilitation. Punitive action shall be taken against unscrupulous exporters under the proposed Section 32 C of the Customs Act, 1969 and the allied laws.

    This initiative has arisen in the backdrop of reports indicating mis-invoicing in exports, which includes under-invoicing resulting in loss of remittance of forex and over-invoicing used to transfer excessive funds abroad.

    Under-invoicing could be used also possibly as a mechanism for trade-based money laundering. One of the suspected methods used in under-invoicing in exports is through the medium of via port cargo.

    Export cargoes are mis-declared by under-invoicing the values of export commodities, and shipped to a via port wherein new declaration with actual values are re-shipped for a final destination.

    As a consequence, lesser amount of foreign exchange is remitted to Pakistan and a major portion of export proceeds is retained in the other country.