Tag: FBR

FBR, Pakistan’s national tax collecting agency, plays a crucial role in the country’s economy. Pakistan Revenue is committed to providing readers with the latest updates and developments regarding FBR activities.

  • FBR explains salary tax to be chargeable for Tax Year 2020

    FBR explains salary tax to be chargeable for Tax Year 2020

    KARACHI: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has explained the treatment of salary tax to be applicable during Tax Year 2020.

    The FBR issued Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 updated till June 30, 2019 and explained the taxability on salary received by an employee.

    Under Section 12 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 the salary chargeable to tax as:

    Section 12: Salary

    Sub-Section (1): Any salary received by an employee in a tax year, other than salary that is exempt from tax under this Ordinance, shall be chargeable to tax in that year under the head “Salary”.

    Sub-Section (2): Salary means any amount received by an employee from any employment, whether of a revenue or capital nature, including —

    (a) any pay, wages or other remuneration provided to an employee, including leave pay, payment in lieu of leave, overtime payment, bonus, commission, fees, gratuity or work condition supplements (such as for unpleasant or dangerous working conditions);

    (b) any perquisite, whether convertible to money or not;

    (c) the amount of any allowance provided by an employer to an employee including a cost of living, subsistence, rent, utilities, education, entertainment or travel allowance, but shall not include any allowance solely expended in the performance of the employee’s duties of employment;

    (d) the amount of any expenditure incurred by an employee that is paid or reimbursed by the employer, other than expenditure incurred on behalf of the employer in the performance of the employee’s duties of employment;

    (e) the amount of any profits in lieu of, or in addition to, salary or wages, including any amount received —

    (i) as consideration for a person’s agreement to enter into an employment relationship;

    (ii) as consideration for an employee’s agreement to any conditions of employment or any changes to the employee’s conditions of employment;

    (iii) on termination of employment, whether paid voluntarily or under an agreement, including any compensation for redundancy or loss of employment and golden handshake payments;

    (iv) from a provident or other fund, to the extent to which the amount is not a repayment of contributions made by the employee to the fund in respect of which the employee was not entitled to a deduction; and

    (v) as consideration for an employee’s agreement to a restrictive covenant in respect of any past, present or prospective employment;

    (f) any pension or annuity, or any supplement to a pension or annuity; and

    (g) any amount chargeable to tax as “Salary” under section 14.

    Sub-Section (3): Where an employer agrees to pay the tax chargeable on an employee’s salary, the amount of the employee’s income chargeable under the head “Salary” shall be grossed up by the amount of tax payable by the employer.

    Sub-Section (4): No deduction shall be allowed for any expenditure incurred by an employee in deriving amounts chargeable to tax under the head “Salary”.

    Sub-Section (5): For the purposes of this Ordinance, an amount or perquisite shall be treated as received by an employee from any employment regardless of whether the amount or perquisite is paid or provided —

    (a) by the employee’s employer, an associate of the employer, or by a third party under an arrangement with the employer or an associate of the employer;

    (b) by a past employer or a prospective employer; or

    (c) to the employee or to an associate of the employee or to a third party under an agreement with the employee or an associate of the employee.

    Sub-Section (6): An employee who has received an amount referred to in sub-clause (iii) of clause (e) of sub-section (2) in a tax year may, by notice in writing to the Commissioner, elect for the amount to be taxed at the rate computed in accordance with the following formula, namely: —

    A/B%

    where —

    A is the total tax paid or payable by the employee on the employee’s total taxable income for the three preceding tax years; and

    B is the employee’s total taxable income for the three preceding tax years.

    Sub-Section (7): Where —

    (a) any amount chargeable under the head “Salary” is paid to an employee in arrears; and

    (b) as a result the employee is chargeable at higher rates of tax than would have been applicable if the amount had been paid to the employee in the tax year in which the services were rendered, the employee may, by notice in writing to the Commissioner, elect for the amount to be taxed at the rates of tax that would have been applicable if the salary had been paid to the employee in the tax year in which the services were rendered.

    Sub –Section (8) An election under sub-section (6) or (7) shall be made by the due date for furnishing the employee’s return of income or employer certificate, as the case may be, for the tax year in which the amount was received or by such later date as the Commissioner may allow.

  • FBR notifies major reshuffle in Pakistan Customs Service; 35 officers transferred

    FBR notifies major reshuffle in Pakistan Customs Service; 35 officers transferred

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) on Friday in a major reshuffle transferred and posted 35 officers of Pakistan Customs Service (PCS) from BS-17 to BS-21 with immediate effect and until further orders.

    (more…)
  • FBR warns sellers against using CNICs of employees to fulfill condition

    FBR warns sellers against using CNICs of employees to fulfill condition

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has warned sellers against using CNIC/NTN of their employees to fulfill condition in case supplies made to unregistered persons.

    The FBR on Friday issued Sales Tax General Order (STGO) No. 106/2019 regarding definition / rules for CNIC/ good faith for sales tax.

    Keeping in view the problems reported by the registered persons is ensuring proper identity of the buyer to fulfil the requirement of reporting NTN/NIC of the buyer in terms of section 23 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, it is directed that the NIC/NTN of the buyer with respect to taxable supplies to an unregistered person shall be deemed to have been reported in good faith by the supplier provided that:

    (a) The tax invoice complies with the requirements of section 23(b) of the Act.
    (b) Payment made by or on behalf of the unregistered purchaser of the amount of the tax invoice, inclusive of sales tax and applicable further tax, is deposited into the supplier’s declared business bank account.
    (c) The NIC provided by the purchaser is found authenticated by the National Data and Registration Authority (NADRA).
    (d) The NIC/NTN provided is not of the employee of the seller or of his associates as defined under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.

    The issuance of a show cause notice to a registered person being a seller on account of any matter arising out of the NIC provided by a purchaser shall not be made without the prior approval of the Member (IR-Operations), FBR after providing an opportunity of being heard.

  • FBR imposes major penalty on senior auditor for obtaining nationality of another country

    FBR imposes major penalty on senior auditor for obtaining nationality of another country

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has imposed major penalty of ‘compulsory retirement’ upon a senior auditor for obtaining citizenship of another country and for visiting abroad by concealing facts of his government job.

    The FBR on Friday said that the inquiry proceedings were initiated against Tahir Gul, Senior Auditor (BS-16), RTO Islamabad on the directions of the Federal Services Tribunal (FST); by issuance of Charge Sheet and Statement of allegations by the Authorized Officer i .e. Chief Commissioner, Regional Tax Office, Islamabad.

    Mussaratullah Khan, Additional Commissioner, RTO Islamabad was appointed as the Inquiry Officer. The Inquiry Officer submitted Inquiry report dated 02.08.2019, on the basis of which the Authorized Officer recommended to the Authority for imposition of Major Penalty of “Dismissal from Service” under Rule 4(1)(b)(iv) of the Government Servants (Efficiency & Discipline), Rules 1973.

    The Authority i.e. Member (Admn) FBR, after considering the facts of the case, available record, recommendations of the Authorized Officer and verbal submissions of the Accused Officer during the personal hearing conducted on 26.09.2019; has been imposed Major Penalty of “Compulsory Retirement” upon Tahir Gul, Senior Auditor (BS-16), Regional Tax Office, Islamabad under rule 4(1)(b)(ii) of the Government Servants (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules, 1973 with immediate effect.

    The period of his absence since initial order of Removal from Service on 04.11.2011 till his reinstatement on the direction of FST with immediate effect, on 06.05.2019; shall be treated as Leave without pay and allowance.

    Mussaratullah Khan was awarded ‘removal from service’ through a notification on November 04, 2011, on the basis of following facts established against the official:

    i) He obtained Passport on mis-representation of facts showing him as an ordinary citizen and not a civil servant.

    ii) Proceeded abroad without approval of the competent authority/authorized leave.

    iii) Obtained citizenship of another country without permission of the Government.

    iv) He furnished bogus medical certificate.

  • FBR issues computation of taxable income for tax year 2020

    FBR issues computation of taxable income for tax year 2020

    KARACHI: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has issued computation of taxable income for the tax year 2020 (July 01, 2019 to June 30, 2020).

    The FBR issued Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 updated till June 30, 2019 under which the computation of taxable income for tax year 2020 has also been updated.

    According to Section 09 of the Ordinance, the taxable income of a person for a tax year shall be the total income under clause (a) of section 10 of the person for the year reduced (but not below zero) by the total of any deductible allowances under Part IX of this Chapter of the person for the year.

    Section 10: Total Income

    The total income of a person for a tax year shall be the sum of the –

    (a) person’s income under all heads of income for the year; and

    (b) person’s income exempt from tax under any of the provisions of this Ordinance.

    Section 11: Heads of income

    (1) For the purposes of the imposition of tax and the computation of total income, all income shall be classified under the following heads, namely: —

    (a) Salary;

    (b) Income from Property;

    (c) Income from Business;

    (d) Capital Gains; and

    (e) Income from Other Sources.

    (2) Subject to this Ordinance, the income of a person under a head of income for a tax year shall be the total of the amounts derived by the person in that year that are chargeable to tax under the head as reduced by the total deductions, if any, allowed under this Ordinance to the person for the year under that head.

    (3) Subject to this Ordinance, where the total deductions allowed under this Ordinance to a person for a tax year under a head of income exceed the total of the amounts derived by the person in that year that are chargeable to tax under that head, the person shall be treated as sustaining a loss for that head for that year of an amount equal to the excess.

    (4) A loss for a head of income for a tax year shall be dealt with in accordance with Part VIII of this Chapter.

    (5) The income of a resident person under a head of income shall be computed by taking into account amounts that are Pakistan-source income and amounts that are foreign-source income.

    (6) The income of a non-resident person under a head of income shall be computed by taking into account only amounts that are Pakistan-source income.

  • FBR promotes 75 data entry operators to MIS officers

    FBR promotes 75 data entry operators to MIS officers

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) on Thursday promoted 75 Data Entry Operator (DEOs) BS-12 to the post of Management of Information System (MIS) Officer BS-16 on regular basis with immediate effect and until further orders.

    The FBR has promoted top 75 senior DEOs, who were waiting for their promotions for a long time.

    Following is the list of promoted DEOs to the post of MIS Officers:

    Name and place of posting

    01. Abdul Hamid Khan, Large Taxpayers Unit (LTU), Lahore

    02. Muhammad Amin S/o Bashir Ahmad, Data Processing Center (DPC) Income Tax, Lahore.

    03. Aslam Javed Butt, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    04. Muhammad Ismail S/o Ghulam Gilani, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    05. Syed Junaid Saeed, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    06. Tahir Hussain Khan, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    07. Syed Tariq Ali, DPC, Income Tax, Rawalpindi.

    08. Khalid Mehmood Awan, DPC, Income Tax, Rawalpindi

    09. Tahir Ali, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    10. Sabir Hussain Lashari, Regional Tax Office (RTO) Hyderabad.

    11. Raheela Baloch, RTO Hyderabad.

    12. Muhammad Iqbal S/o Muhammad Ishaq (late) DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    13. Idrees Ahmed, DPC, Income Tax, Lahore.

    14. Parvez H Rizvi, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    15. Kamal Haider, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    16. S. Shafaat Hussain Naqvi, DPC, Income Tax, Multan.

    17. Muhammad Mashkoor Khan, LTU Karachi.

    18. S. M. Sharique, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    19. Kafil Ahmed Jamali, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    20. Shagufta Naz, Chief Coordinator Computer Wing, Income Tax, Islamabad.

    21. Farida Essa, Directorate of Internal Audit (Inland Revenue), Islamabad.

    22. Kauser Parveen, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    23. Muhammad Saleem, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    24. Mansoor Ahmed, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    25. Nadeem Yousuf Zai, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    26. Shahzad Saleem, RTO-II, Karachi.

    27. Iffat Irfani, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    28. Nasir Khan Baloch, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    29. Muhammad Saeed Hussain Shah, DPC, Income Tax, Rawalpindi.

    30. Riaz Ahmed, DPC, Income Tax, Rawalpindi.

    31. Muhammad Iqbal, RTO, Faisalabad.

    32. Saqib Ahmed Siddiqui, DPC, Income Tax, Peshawar.

    33. Zafar Iqbal, DPC, Income Tax, Peshawar.

    34. Ashraf Sohaib, RTO-II, Karachi.

    35. Raheela Hakim, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    36. Shabbir Hussain, RTO, Faisalabad.

    37. Saeed Tahir, DPC, Income Tax, Rawalpindi.

    38. Muhammad Aslam, DPC, Income Tax, Rawalpindi.

    39. Muhammad Rashid Bhatti, RTO-II Lahore.

    40. Nadeem Ul Hasan, Directorate of Intelligence and Investigation, Inland Revenue, Karachi.

    41. Malik Saeed Ahmed, DPC, Income Tax, Multan.

    42. Ghulam Ali Malik, FBR Headquarter, Islamabad.

    43. Imran Ahmed Khan, RTO-II, Lahore.

    44. Shahid Iqbal, DPC, Income Tax, Multan.

    45. Saifullah Bughio, RTO Hyderabad.

    46. Abdul Aziz, LTU Karachi.

    47. Muhammad Arif Mushtaq, LTU Karachi.

    48. Azmatullah, RTO-II Karachi.

    49. Syed Musheeruddin, LTU Karachi.

    50. Mukhtar Jagirani, LTU Karachi.

    51. Farrukh Saeed, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    52. Obaidullah Naeem, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    53. Muhammad Zahid S/o Hamid Ahmed Usmani, RTO Quetta.

    54. Irfan Sabir, RTO Quetta.

    55. Zafar Hassain, LTU Karachi.

    56. Saleem Siddiqui, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    57. Syed Yousuf, LTU Karachi.

    58. Malik Nasar Javed, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    59. Shabana Talat Siddiqui, RTO-III, Karachi.

    60. Wajid Hussain, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    61. Sahir Farooqui, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    62. Noor Hayat Khan, Corporate RTO, Karachi.

    63. Sh. M. Ismail S/o Shaikh Muhammad Ramzan, DPC, Income Tax, Karachi.

    64. Ayaz Haider, RTO Peshawar.

    65. Muhammad Yousuf Khan, LTU-II Karachi.

    66. Muhammad Amin, DPC, Income Tax, Rawalpindi.

    67. Muhammad Atif khan, DPC, Income Tax, Rawalpindi.

    68. Iftikhar Ahmed, DPC, Income Tax, Rawalpindi.

    69. Gul Khan, DPC, Income Tax, Rawalpindi.

    70. Abdul Rauf Siddiqui, RTO-II, Lahore.

    71. Ejaz Ahmed Butt, DPC Income Tax, Rawalpindi.

    72. Naveed Mirza, DPC, Income Tax, Lahore.

    73. Ghulam Muhammad Toor, DPC, Income Tax, Multan.

    74. Asif Hussain, RTO Sialkot.

    75. Arshad Mehmood, RTO Rawalpindi

    The FBR said that the promoted officers would be on probation for a period of one year, extendable, for a further period not exceeding one year, provided that if no order is issued by the day of following the termination of probationary period, the appointment shall be deemed to be held until further orders.

    The officers already drawing performance allowance equal to 100 percent of the basic pay will continue to draw the same on their promotion.

  • Customs official awarded major penalty for corruption, misconduct

    Customs official awarded major penalty for corruption, misconduct

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has imposed major penalty of ‘compulsory retirement’ upon a BS-16 officials of Pakistan Customs on charges of corruption, misconduct and inefficiency.

    According to an official note issued on Thursday the FBR said that disciplinary proceedings under Government Servants (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules, 1973 were initiated against Mansab Shah, Inspector (BS-16), Model Customs Collectorate of Preventive, Lahore on account of “Inefficiency”, “Misconduct” and “Corruption” under E&D, Rules 1973 after placing him under suspension vide notification 25.03.2019.

    “On receipt of preliminary fact finding inquiry report, all charges were established.”

    A Show Cause Notice dated 27.03.2019 was accordingly issued to him and he was also called for personal hearing by the Authorized Officer / Collector, MCC (Preventive), Lahore on 28.05.2019.

    After considering the charges framed in the charge sheet and other available record, the Authorized Officer / Collector, MCC (Preventive), Lahore recommended to the Authority for imposition of major penalty of Compulsory Retirement.

    The Member (Admn) FBR being Authority in this case, after having considered all aspects of the case and the recommendations of the Authorized Officer has therefore, imposed the major penalty of “Compulsory Retirement” upon Mansab Shah, Inspector, under rule 4(1)(b)(ii) of the Govt. Servants (Efficiency & Discipline) Rules, 1973 with immediate effect.

    The period of suspension of the accused officer w.e.f 25.03.2019 till date will be treated as a leave of kind due as admissible under the rules.

    The official shall have right of Appeal as admissible in the Civil Servants (Appeal) Rules, 1977.

  • FBR issues fresh list of sectors allowed input tax adjustment

    FBR issues fresh list of sectors allowed input tax adjustment

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has issued fresh list of sectors to allow input adjustment by amending the Section 8B of Sales Tax Act, 1990.

    The FBR issued SRO 1190(I)/2019 on Thursday in suppression of its previous SRO 647(I)/2007 dated June 27, 2007.

    The following sectors have been allowed input adjustment and refunds:

    01. Persons registered in electrical energy sector.

    02. Oil marketing companies and petroleum refineries.

    03. Fertilizers manufacturers.

    04. Persons making zero-rated supplies, including exports, provided that value of such supplies exceeds 50 percent of value of all taxable supplies in a tax period.

    05. Distributors.

    06. Gas distribution companies.

    07. Telecommunication services.

    08. Pakistan Steel, Bin Qasim, Karachi.

    09. Registered persons other than manufacturers, making supplies of items covered under the Third Schedule to the Sales tax Act, 1990, on which sales tax has been paid by the manufacturer or importer on retail price, provided that value of such supplies exceeds 80 percent of value of all taxable supplies in a tax period.

    10. Commercial importers where value of import subject to 3 percent value addition as prescribed in Twelfth Schedule to the Act exceeds 50 percent of value of all taxable purchases, including imports, in a tax period.

    Through the latest SRO the retailers also importing goods in bulk and operating chain stores have been allowed adjustment of input tax to the extent of 95 percent of the output tax for the tax period and the excess amount shall be carried forward to the next period.

    The FBR further said that the first proviso of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2) and (3) of Section 8B of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to the input tax to be adjusted or carried forward as provided in clause (b).

  • SRO to save customs officers in mega gold scam challenged before FBR policy board

    SRO to save customs officers in mega gold scam challenged before FBR policy board

    ISLAMABAD: The Directorate General of Internal Audit (Customs) Lahore has challenged the issuance of SRO 1114(I)/2019 before the Policy Board of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) alleging the issuance of the notification was a bid to save senior customs officers in mega gold corruption cases.

    In a compliant on October 02, 2019 made to Dr. Abdul Hafeez Shaikh, Advisor to Prime Minister on Finance and Revenue and Chairman FBR’s Policy Board and the other members of the FBR’s policy board that is constituted under Section 6 of the FBR Act, 2007, it has been alleged that the SRO has taken away from the Customs Internal Audit its capacity to detect customs officers’ corruption and resulting massive revenue loss.

    The SRO has been called a device to liberate the customs officers’ corruption and revenue losses from the fear of subsequent internal audit’s detection.

    According to the complainant i.e. Directorate General of Internal Audit (Customs) Lahore, the FBR has purported to act under certain provisions of Customs Act and Sales Tax Act which do not give the FBR any power to abolish any field formations.

    It is alleged that these provisions confer on FBR only the power to appoint officers in field formations and to define their powers and functions.

    It has been further alleged that two directorates of Internal Audit had been abolished in breach of FBR’s statutory obligations under FBR Act, 2007.

    According to the complainant, Section 4(1)(d) of FBR Act requires FBR to improve productivity in its field formations. Section 4(1)(g) of FBR Act requires FBR to take appropriate measures including internal controls to combat corruption within its field formations.

    Section 4(1)(j) of FBR Act requires FBR to introduce and maintain a system of accountability of performance, competence and conduct of its employees.

    It has been alleged that abolition of two directorates of internal audit and over burdening of the single directorate of Islamabad with the responsibility of Customs Internal Audit throughout the country is a measure against FBR’s statutory obligation to improve productivity in field formations.

    It is also a measure against the FBR’s statutory obligation to control corruption and to maintain a system of performance accountability of its officers and employees.

    The complainant questioned that why FBR has conceived a unique SRO of its own kind which has the effect of sheltering corruption and revenue losses from the fear of detection.

    It has been alleged in the complaint that the Directorate of Internal Audit Karachi has been abolished to shelter the customs officers posted in Karachi, who are normally responsible for 90 percent of the customs corruption and revenue losses which take place throughout the country in a year.

    It has been further alleged that the Directorate of Internal Audit Lahore has been abolished for more than one reason, all meant to shelter revenue losses from detection and to save corrupt customs officers from accountability.

    It has been alleged in the complaint that the struggle of Directorate of Internal Audit Lahore to recover a revenue loss of Rs60 billion in gold cases and the efforts of the Directorate to take gold cases against customs officers to a logical conclusion have resulted in its abolition just to serve the interests of senior customs officers involved in these cases.

    The gold case made by Internal Audit took a new beginning when in response to a new story published on June 11, 2018, the Federal Tax Ombudsman took suo moto cognizance of these cases involving a revenue loss of Rs60 billion and recommended disciplinary and criminal proceedings against the customs officers responsible for causing the revenue loss.

    The collector of five customs collectorates subsequently filed representations against FTO’s recommendations before the President of Pakistan. However, the Directorate of Internal Audit Lahore had pleaded the gold cases against the customs officers.

    The directorate of internal audit Lahore requested the FBR Policy Board that the operation of SRO may be immediately held in abeyance till determination of its legality and proper evaluation of its pro corruption consequences.

  • FBR says 48 companies integrated sales data

    FBR says 48 companies integrated sales data

    ISLAMABAD: At least 48 leading companies have integrated their sales data with the online system of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR).

    The FBR issued the list of these 48 companies which opted for integrating their retail point of sales (POS) with the FBR in order to get reduced rates of sales tax.

    Following is the list of the companies:

    SERVICE INDUSTRIES LTD

    NISHAT (CHUNIAN) LIMITED

    HOUSE OF ITTEHAD (PRIVATE) LIMITED

    AL-KARAM TEXTILE MILLS (PRIVATE) LIMITED

    GUL AHMED TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED

    TRI-STAR POLYESTER LIMITED

    BATA PAKISTAN LIMITED

    LAKHANY SILK MILLS (PRIVATE) LIMITED

    FIRHAJ FOOTWEARS (PRIVATE) LIMITED

    SERVICE SALES CORPORATION (PVT) LIMITED

    SHAPAR PVT LTD

    BORJAN (PRIVATE) LIMITED

    FAMOUS BRANDS (PRIVATE) LIMITED

    URBAN SOLE

    KHAWAJA TANNERIES (PRIVATE) LIMITED

    SEFAM (PVT) LTD

    THREE STARS HOSIERY MILLS (PRIVATE) LIMITED

    NISHAT MILLS LIMITED

    SHOE PLANET (PRIVATE) LIMITED

    TIMES CLOTHING PVT LIMITED

    CAMBRIDGE GARMENT INDUSTRIES (PRIVATE) LIMITED

    GENERATION (PRIVATE) LIMITED

    KAMAL LIMITED

    NISHAT LINEN (PRIVATE) LIMITED

    MISHA FASHIONS (PVT.) LIMITED

    HUSSAIN MANUFACTURING (PVT.) LIMITED

    RETAIL AVENUE (PVT.) LIMITED

    M/S. AKAZ BRANDS (PVT.) LIMITED

    LOFT COMMERCIALS LIMITED

    NASEEM ENTERPRISES & TRADING (PRIVATE) LIMITED

    AL-RAZZAQ FIBRES (PVT.) LIMITED

    OUTFITTERS STORES

    THE OAKS PAKISTAN PVT LTD

    SAPPHIRE RETAIL LIMITED

    SSFR (PVT.) LIMITED

    KHAADI (SMC-PVT.) LIMITED

    URBAN BRANDS

    LEVI STRAUSS PAKISTAN (PRIVATE) LIMITED

    RAFUM INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED

    AMIR KAMAL

    SHEIKHUPURA TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED

    IBL IDENTITY (PRIVATE) LIMITED

    SANAULLA TEXTILE MILLS

    MRS FARNAZ AHMAD

    SAID AHMED BRANDS (PRIVATE) LIMITED

    HIGHPOINT VENTURES (PRIVATE) LIMITED

    SANAULLA LONGFU TEXTILE (PVT.) LIMITED

    S-LUXE (PRIVATE) LIMITED