Tag: Banking Mohtasib Pakistan

  • President Alvi orders two banks to pay victims of fraud

    President Alvi orders two banks to pay victims of fraud

    ISLAMABAD: Pakistan President Dr. Arif Alvi has ordered two banks i.e. Al Baraka Bank Ltd (ABBL) and Habib Bank Ltd (HBL) to pay their customers in order to provide relief in fraud cases.

    President Dr Arif Alvi has upheld two different decisions of the Banking Mohtasib (BM) ordering Al Baraka Bank Ltd (ABBL) and Habib Bank Ltd (HBL) to pay Rs9.145 million to Mrs. Zahida Naseem and Rs 5 million to Mushtaq Ahmed Bajwa, respectively, who had been swindled out of their money by the management of the banks.

    The President rejected the appeals of both the banks against the decisions of the Banking Mohtasib.

    He regretted that the victims of fraud, including an Overseas Pakistani, suffered a lot at the hands of the banks’ management and no relief was provided to them.

    He urged the public to avail the services of the Banking Mohtasib to seek relief in fraud cases as well as against the maladministration of bank officials/officers.

    According to details of both the cases, Mrs Zahida Naseem (complainant) opened her PKR Account on 03-03-2017 and British Pound Sterling on 28-03-2017 with Al Baraka Bank, at DHA Branch, Lahore. She applied for Term Deposit for an amount of Rs 10.7 million for one year after signing her cheque and TDR Application Form.

    The then Branch Manager, Omer Ikram, provided her fake and fabricated Account Statement and TDR Certificates on bank’s Letter Head.

    However, in July, she came to know that the given account statement and TDR certificates were fake and fabricated.

    The Bank Manger had fraudulently used her cheque and requested for Real Time Gross Settlement instead of TDR. It was later revealed that Ikram had allegedly committed fraud of huge amount of Rs 125 million and was an expert in making and providing tampered and fake bank statements to his clients.

    This was admitted by the bank which had cancelled the policies of clients and had refunded money to respective accounts in different cases. In this case, an amount of Rs 9 million was transferred to the bank account of Mr Ikram’s personal driver.

    Mrs. Naseem requested ABBL to credit the lost funds to her account but without any result. Subsequently, she approached the Banking Mohtasib for the redressal of her grievance.

    In a similar case, Mushtaq Ahmed Bajwa (complainant), an Overseas Pakistani living in Holland, was maintaining a PLS Saving Account with Habib Bank Ltd’s branch in Faisalabad.

    He handed over cash of Rs 5 million to the then branch manager, Akhtar Hussain, on 14-04-2017.

    Hussain filled in the deposit slip, and after signing and stamping it, handed over the counterfoil to the complainant. Later on, his brother informed him in Holland that an internal fraud had been perpetrated and funds deposited by several depositors had been embezzled by the ex-Branch Manager.

    The manager had deceitfully mentioned some imaginary cheque numbers on his deposit slip instead of cash amount personally handed over to him.

    Further, the bank lodged an FIR with FIA Faisalabad against the main accused and his accomplices. The bank did not pay Bajwa his claim despite acknowledging his complaint, after which, the complainant approached the Banking Mohtasib to seek justice.

    The Banking Mohtasib investigated both the cases and, after perusal of facts, ordered that the complainants may be refunded their lost money by the respective banks.

    Wafaqi Mohtasib held that the complainants had entrusted their hard earned money to the concerned banks and it was fiduciary duty of the banks to protect their customers.

    It noted that the appointment of vigilant bank officials, honest and professional staff was the responsibility of the bank and not of the complainants.

    The Ombudsman noted that the bank officials had been duly posted by the management of the banks and they were performing the employer’s business, when the complainants had suffered financial losses due to the unethical and fraudulent activities of the authorized bank officers.

    The bank cannot escape the liability in such cases when the commission of fraud with the accountholder by its management is established and admitted, the BM held.

    The Mohtasib ordered that both the banks were responsible to make good the loss of the complainants without further delay. Subsequently, the banks filed separate appeals against the decisions of the BM.

    President Dr Arif Alvi upheld both the decisions of the Mohtasib on the grounds that banks were given ample opportunity by the Mohtasib to defend and controvert the claims of the complainants, however, banks had failed to discharge the burden and statutory liability cast upon them under the law.

    “No justification has been made to upset the order of the learned Banking Mohtasib”, the President wrote while rejecting the representations of the banks.

  • President rejects Soneri Bank’s appeal in fraud case

    President rejects Soneri Bank’s appeal in fraud case

    ISLAMABAD: President Dr. Arif Alvi has rejected an appeal filed by Soneri Bank Limited against an order made by Banking Mohtasib.

    The President ordered the bank to pay the amount to complainant in fraud case, a statement said on Saturday.

    According to the details, President Dr. Arif Alvi has rejected the representation, filed by the Soneri Bank Ltd (SBL) against the order of the Banking Mohtasib, and has made the bank responsible to make good the loss of the money to the complainant without further delay.

    While upholding the orders of the Banking Mohtasib to pay an amount of Rs 800,000 amount to the complainant, the President stated in his decision that the bank could not escape the liability in a case of this kind, when the commission of fraud with the account holder by its management was established and admitted.

    He said that the ample opportunity had been provided to the Bank before the learned Banking Mohtasib to defend and controvert the claim of the complainant and even before the forum, however, the bank had failed to discharge the burden and statutory liability cast upon it under the law.

    Muhammad Danish Naseem (the complainant) maintains an account with the Soneri Bank Ltd Sargodha Road Branch, Sheikhupura.

    Danish opened his account on 22-10-2018 in the bank branch and requested the Manager to deposit PKR. 2,000,000/- (two million rupees) cash in the said account. Whereas, the Manager gave him deposit slips of Rs. 500,000/-, Rs. 900,000/- and Rs. 600,000/- respectively.

    Despite insistence of the account holder for issuing one deposit slip of amount i.e. Rs. 2 million, the bank manger issued three deposit slips saying that it was to overcome the restrictions of the SBP.

    Later, the account holder wanted to draw money from his account but there was no sufficient balance in his account. He lodged a complaint with the bank’s authorities but his grievance was not addressed.

    Although, the complainant possessed valid deposit slips admittedly issued by the Ex-Manager bearing his genuine signature and Branch Stamp affixed thereon which validated customer claim to the extent that the Bank had not accounted for amounts of PKR. 2,000,000/- in his account.

    Furthermore, the Bank had admitted during the proceedings before the Banking Mohtasib that the receipts in possession of the customers bore signatures of the Bank’s ex-Manager.

    Despite all these proofs, the complainant was compelled to run from pillar to post and no relief was provided to him. Feeling aggrieved, Danish Naseem approached the Banking Mohtasib for his grievance.

    The Banking Mohtasib, under Section 82 D of the BCO read with Section 9 of the Federal Ombudsmen Institutional Reforms Act, 2013 (No. XIV of 2013), advised the Bank to forthwith make good the loss by crediting the account of the complainant with a sum of Rs800,000/- in pursuance of the findings.

    While rejecting representation of the Bank, the President has noted that it is a case of wrong doing and maladministration by the Bank officials and it is, therefore, responsible to make good the loss of the complainant.

    He further stated that the ambit and extent of jurisdiction of Banking Mohtasib was spelt out under Section 82A (3)(a)(e), Section 82B(4)(5) and Section 82F of the Banking Companies Ordinance, 1962.

    The cumulative reading and perusal of these provisions of law undoubtedly leads to the conclusion that the Banking Mohtasib is to inquire into the complainants about banking malpractices, maladministration, wrong doings, the fraudulent transactions, the corrupt and malafide practices by the Bank officials and pass appropriate orders on conclusion of inquiry.

    These powers of the Banking Mohtasib when considered in context with Section 18 and 24 of the Federal Ombudsmen Institutional Reforms Act, 2013 further show that in matters falling within the jurisdiction of the Banking Mohtasib, stated the decision.

  • Banking Ombudsman provides Rs305.5 million monetary relief to customers

    Banking Ombudsman provides Rs305.5 million monetary relief to customers

    KARACHI: The Banking Mohtasib (Ombudsman) Pakistan has provided monetary relief amounting to Rs 305.5 million to the banking customers by disposing of 14,910 complaints during the first half (January to June) of the current calendar year, 2021, according to a press release issued on Tuesday.

    About 99 per cent (14,755) complaints were resolved amicably while only1 per cent (155) complaints required resolution through formal Orders.

    There is no letup in the number of complaints being lodged against commercial banks with the Banking Mohtasib as nearly 20,220 new complaints, including 13,027 from Prime Minister’s Portal, were received from 1st January to 30th June, 2021.

    There has been 81 per cent increase in the number of complaints lodged with the Banking Mohtasib against commercial banks during the first half of the current year, 2021 as against the first half of the last calendar year, 2020 when 11,174 complaints were filed.

    It may be pointed out that during the first half of the last calendar year (2020), the Banking Mohtasib Office had provided monetary relief amounting to Rs 318.6 million to the banking customers by disposing of 11,251 complaints. More complaints were disposed of than received was due to the fact that some complaints were carried forward from the year, 2019.

    With a view to protecting the banking customers from any fraud and forgeries, the Banking Mohtasib Pakistan continuously reminds them not to disclose their personal and financial information to any person.

  • President rejects MCB Bank’s stance on internet banking fraud

    President rejects MCB Bank’s stance on internet banking fraud

    ISLAMABAD: President Dr Arif Alvi on Friday rejected the representation of MCB Bank challenging the order of Banking Mohtasib to credit the lost money to its account holder, who had fallen victim to internet banking fraud.

    (more…)
  • Highest monthly complaints of banking frauds, forgeries register in March 2021

    Highest monthly complaints of banking frauds, forgeries register in March 2021

    KARACHI: The office of Banking Mohtasib Pakistan has said that complaints against banking frauds, forgeries and other regularities were monthly highest received in March 2021 since the inception of Mohtasib office in 2005.

    Complaints against banking frauds and forgeries registered massive increase of 135 percent during three months (January – March) of 2021 as compared with same period of the last year.

    According to a statement issued on Friday, the office of the Banking Mohtasib Pakistan said that over 135 percent increase had been observed in the number of complaints lodged against alleged frauds, forgeries and other irregularities during the first quarter (January – March) of 2021 as compared to the same period of the last year 2020.

    The office of the Banking Mohtasib Pakistan said that 11,732 complaints were received by the Banking Mohtasib Secretariat during the first quarter of 2021 as compared with 4,994 complaints received in the same period of the last year.

    “These also include 7,595 complaints received on Prime Minister’s Portal relating to banking issues as compared to 1,411 complaints received during the first quarter of previous year.”

    Out of total 11,732 complaints, 5,375 complaints were received in the month of March only, which is the highest figure of complaints recorded in a single month since the inception of Banking Mohtasib Pakistan Office in 2005.

    “The increase in number of complaints indicates that the general public feels that their genuine grievances will be resolved amicably by the Banking Mohtasib office,” according to the statement.

    The Banking Mohtasib Secretariat disposed of 4,672 complaints from January 01 to March 31, 2021 out of which only two percent of complaints were resolved through formal orders while remaining 98 percent of complaints were resolved amicably.

    By disposing of these complaints, the Banking Mohtasib Office has provided monetary relief amounting to Rs132.62 million to the banking customers during the first quarter of 2021.

    Banking Mohtasib Pakistan Muhammad Kamran Shehzad urged the general public not to disclose their personal and financial credential to any person in order to protect themselves from any fraud and forgeries.

  • Bank less bother to check taxpayers’ active status while deducting withholding tax

    Bank less bother to check taxpayers’ active status while deducting withholding tax

    KARACHI: In an interesting case an account holder suffered deduction of withholding tax at a higher rate on banking transactions despite the account holder’s name was on the Active Taxpayers List (ATL).

    According to a case study, a complainant lodged a complaint before the Banking Mohtasib Pakistan that the concerned bank had deducted withholding tax on the transactions while treating the account holder as non-file despite the fact the name was on the ATL.

    The case study revealed the complainant stated that he was maintaining a current account in his company’s name with a bank and was also a filer having registered tax payer status which also appeared in Active Taxpayer List (ATL) issued by Federal Board of Revenue (FBR).

    On January 23, 2019, the Bank’s branch deducted a sum of Rs 600/- from the Company’s account treating the Complainant as a Non-Filer to which he protested.

    The branch after completion of certain procedural formalities confirmed that henceforward no withholding tax on cash withdrawals will be recovered as the account status was of a filer, but to his surprise the bank continued recovering withholding tax and each time he was asked to furnish some more documents which he did accordingly, but to no avail.

    Upon reconciliation of his account, he found that the branch has recovered around Rs 293,000/- from the account since January 2019 towards tax deduction.

    On raising the issue, the branch verbally advised him to file income tax refund application with FBR which he found unjust because the branch had illegally recovered WHT from his account and did not rectify its own mistake despite notice since January 2019.

    He demanded that the bank should reverse the withholding tax and flag his account as a filer so that such a lapse did not recur.

    The bank did not pay any heed to his request. Therefore, he approached the office of Banking Mohtasib for redressal of this complaint.

    On Banking Mohtasib Pakistan query, the Bank informed that the said account was opened in November 2018 and the complainant approached the branch in September 2019 for marking of tax exemption on his account, provided NTN Certificate which was sent to the Bank’s central processing unit (CPU) for necessary updating in system, but the same was returned by CPU with the reason “Updated NTN Certificate is required”.

    The branch approached him and he confirmed that the provided certificate was the only updated one and no other certificate was available with him. The branch also checked the stated NTN number on the Bank’s Online Tax Verification Portal that gave NIL report apparently confirming that given certificate was not correct and updated one.

    Upon subsequent request by the branch, on a hit and trial error method basis started adding 0 to 9 in start and end of provided NTN number and checked each Online Tax Verification Portal.

    On query, the branch came to know that one digit (6) was missing on NTN Certificate and was added in writing by hand which is evident from attached certificate and finally account was marked Filer in October 2019.

    Since the deducted tax was already deposited in Government Treasury within 7 days after deduction and cannot be refunded, therefore, he was requested to obtain Tax Deduction Certificate from the Bank and claim advance tax deduction in his Tax Return of 2018-2019 or may lodge his tax refund claim with FBR on the basis of Tax Deduction Certificate.

    The Bank’s comments were shared with the Complainant who through his Income Tax Consultant stated that the last digit in any NTN number is called Check Digit which is not required to check the NTN details and /or ATL status of any tax payer, which showed that the concerned Bank officers (s) have never bothered to check the ATL status or NTN details of the tax payer.

    Upon sharing the above stance of the Complainant, the Bank asserted that the Bank’s internal system does not verify NTN without checking number. In order to ascertain the veracity of both parties’ assertion a demo was arranged in office of Banking Mohtasib Pakistan, visited FBR site for Online Verification System and put Registration No (without check digit) which gave the result that Complainant’s Filing status as “Active”.

    This clearly demonstrates that Bank’s misrepresented the facts to Banking Mohtasib which has been viewed very seriously.

    The Bank was, therefore, advised to refund or adjust the excess tax deducted from the Complainant’s account and the Bank may obtain the refund of the sum so paid from the FBR with the necessary help and coordination from the Complainant, if desired.

    The Bank, however, filed a Representation against the findings of the Banking Mohtasib before the President of Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

  • Careless bank record keeping creates difficulties for foreign currency account holder

    Careless bank record keeping creates difficulties for foreign currency account holder

    KARACHI – A Foreign Currency Account (FCA) holder faced immense inconvenience when his bank was unable to trace his long-maintained account. According to the 2020 Annual Report issued by the Office of Banking Mohtasib Pakistan, the complainant claimed that he had opened an FCA with a local bank branch in 1996 before leaving for Saudi Arabia.

    (more…)
  • Habib Bank tops in customers complaints list

    Habib Bank tops in customers complaints list

    KARACHI: Habib Bank Limited (HBL) has topped in failing to satisfy customers with the services as the highest number of complaints were filed against the bank at the Wafaqi Mohtasib (Ombudsman) Pakistan.

    The annual report for the year 2020 issued by the office of Wafaqi Mohtasib last week revealed that the highest number of complaints against any bank was received against HBL, which is 23.37 percent of the total complaints received during the year.

    The office of the Wafaqi Mohtasib received 22,750 complaints during the year. The banking customers lodged around 5,317 complaints against HBL during the year.

    The banking customers have expressed more dissatisfaction during the current year as the percentage of complaints lodged against the bank out of the total complaints increased.

    The Banking Mohtasib Pakistan received a sum of 14,587 complaints against all banks during 2019. While in the same year the complaints lodged against the HBL were 2,511 which was 17.21 percent of the total complaints.

    Following table shows number of complaints received against each bank during the year under review. The complaints included received at Banking Mohtasib Secretariat and Prime Minister Portal:

    S.No.Bank NameNo. of complaints
    01Habib Bank Limited5,317
    02United Bank Limited3,098
    03MCB Bank Limited1,870
    04Allied Bank Limited1,539
    05Bank Alfalah Limited1,267
    06National Bank of Pakistan821
    07Faysal Bank Limited802
    08The Bank of Punjab759
    09Meezan Bank Limited759
    10JS Bank Limited665
    11Silk Bank Limited647
    12Standard Chartered Bank (Pakistan) Limited548
    13Askari Bank Limited413
    14Bank Al Habib Limited388
    15Bank Islami Pakistan Limited190
    16Soneri Bank Limited164
    17Dubai Islamic Bank Pakistan Limited162
    18Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited120
    19Habib Metropolitan Bank Limited105
    20The Bank of Khyber85
    21Summit Bank Limited65
    22Albaraka Bank (Pakistan) Limited59
    23Sindh Bank48
    24The Punjab Provincial Cooperative Bank Limited37
    25Samba Bank Limited21
    26First Women Bank Limited8
    27SME Bank Limited3
    28The Bank of Tokyo – Mitsubishi UFG Ltd1
    29Institutions other than banks2,789
     Total22,750
  • Bank branch manager defrauds 29 customers

    Bank branch manager defrauds 29 customers

    KARACHI: During investigation of a case before the Banking Mohtasib Pakistan, a bank revealed that one of its branch manager committed fraud of an amount Rs30 million involving 29 customers.

    (more…)
  • Bank irrationally deducts withholding tax from tax filer

    Bank irrationally deducts withholding tax from tax filer

    KARACHI: A bank has deducted irrationally a huge amount as withholding tax from transactions made by an account holder.

    (more…)