In a strategic move to enhance the enforcement and intelligence capabilities within the tax framework, the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has introduced Section 30A in the Sales Tax Act, 1990.
(more…)Tag: FBR
FBR, Pakistan’s national tax collecting agency, plays a crucial role in the country’s economy. Pakistan Revenue is committed to providing readers with the latest updates and developments regarding FBR activities.
-

Appointment of FBR officers for exercising sales tax law
Section 30 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 has explained appointment of Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) officers for exercising sales tax law.
The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) issued the Sales Tax Act, 1990 updated up to June 30, 2021. The Act incorporated amendments brought through Finance Act, 2021.
Following is the text of section 30 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990:
30. Appointment of Authorities.– (1) For the purposes of this Act, the Board may, appoint in relation to any area, person or class of persons, any person to be –
(a) a chief commissioner of Inland Revenue;
(b) a commissioner of Inland Revenue ;
(c) a commissioner of Inland Revenue (Appeals);
(d) an Additional commissioner of Inland Revenue ;
(e) a Deputy commissioner of Inland Revenue;
(ea) District Taxation Officer Inland Revenue;
(f) an Assistant commissioner of Inland Revenue;
(fa) Assistant Director Audit Inland Revenue;
(g) an Inland Revenue Officer;
(h) a Superintendent Inland Revenue;
(i) an Inland Revenue Auditor Officer;
(ia) an inspector Inland Revenue; and
(j) an officer of Inland Revenue with any other designation.
(2) The Chief Commissioner Inland Revenue and Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) shall be sub-ordinate to the Board and Commissioner Inland Revenue shall be sub-ordinate to the Chief Commissioner Inland Revenue.
(2A) The Chief Commissioners Inland Revenue shall perform their functions in respect of such persons or classes of persons or such areas as the Board may direct.
(2B) The Commissioners Inland Revenue shall perform their functions in respect of such persons or classes of persons or such areas as the Chief Commissioner, to whom they are sub-ordinate, may direct.
(3) Additional Commissioner Inland Revenue, Deputy Commissioners Inland Revenue, District Taxation Officer Inland Revenue, Assistant Commissioner Inland Revenue, Assistant Director Audit Inland Revenue, Superintendent Inland Revenue, Inland Revenue Audit Officer, Inland Revenue Officer, Inspector Inland Revenue, and officer of Inland Revenue with any other designation shall be sub-ordinate to the Commissioner Inland Revenue and shall perform their functions in respect of such persons or classes of persons or such areas as the Commissioners, to whom they are sub ordinate, may direct.
(4) Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue, District Taxation Officer Inland Revenue, Assistant Commissioner Inland Revenue, Assistant Director Audit Inland Revenue, Superintendent Inland Revenue, Inland Revenue Audit Officer, Inland revenue Officer, Inspector Inland Revenue Officer an officer of Inland Revenue with any other designation shall be sub-ordinate to the Additional Commissioner Inland Revenue.
(Disclaimer: The text of above section is only for information. Team PkRevenue.com makes all efforts to provide the correct version of the text. However, the team PkRevenue.com is not responsible for any error or omission.)
-

Filing of special, final returns under Sales Tax Act
Sections 27, 28 and 29 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 has explained special returns and final returns.
The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) issued the Sales Tax Act, 1990 updated up to June 30, 2021. The Act incorporated amendments brought through Finance Act, 2021.
Following is the text of sections 27, 28 and 29 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990:
27. Special Returns.– In addition to the return specified under section 26 –
(a) a person registered under this Act shall furnish special return within such date and in such form indicating information such as quantity manufactured or produced, purchases made, goods supplied or payment of arrears made, etc, for such period as the Board may, by a notification in official gazette, specify; and
(b) the commissioner may require any person whether, registered or not, to furnish a return (whether on his own behalf or as an agent or trustee) in a prescribed form and such person shall furnish the return not later than the date specified in this regard.
28. Final Return.– If a person applies for de-registration in terms of section 21, he shall before such de-registration, furnish a final return to the commissioner in the specified form in such manner and at such time as directed by the commissioner.
29. Return deemed to have been made.– A return purporting to be made on behalf of a person by his duly appointed representative shall, for all purposes, be deemed to have been made by such person or under his authority unless proved to the contrary.
-

Retirement for FBR officials for using political influence
Islamabad: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has issued a stern warning to officials and officers, cautioning them against exerting political pressure in service matters and threatening them with dire consequences, including potential retirement.
(more…) -

Filing sales tax returns mandatory for registered persons
Filing the sales tax returns are mandatory for all registered persons under Section 26 of Sales Tax Act, 1990.
The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) issued the Sales Tax Act, 1990 updated up to June 30, 2021. The Act incorporated amendments brought through Finance Act, 2021.
Following is the text of section 26 of Sales Tax Act, 1990:
26. Return.– (1) Every registered person shall furnish not later than the due date a true, complete and correct return in the prescribed form to a designated bank or any other office specified by the Board, indicating the purchases and the supplies made during a tax period, the tax due and paid and such other information, as may be prescribed;
Provided that the Board may, by notification in the official Gazette, require any person or class of persons to submit return on quarterly basis:
Provided further that the Board may, by notification in the official Gazette, require any person or class of persons to submit such return as may be prescribed annually in addition to the monthly return or quarterly return:
Provided also that the return filed electronically on the web or any magnetic media or any other computer readable media as may be specified by the Board shall also be deemed to be a return for the purpose of sub-section (1) and the Board may, by notification in the official Gazette, make rules for determining eligibility of the data of such returns and e-intermediaries who will digitize the data of such returns and transmit the same electronically under their digital signatures.
(2) omitted
(3) A registered person may, subject to approval of the Commissioner Inland Revenue having jurisdiction, file a revised return within one hundred and twenty days of the filing of return under sub-section (1) or, as the case may be, sub-section (2), or under clause (a) or clause (b) of section 27, to correct any omission or wrong declaration made therein:
Provided that the approval under this sub-section shall not be required if revised return is filed within sixty days of filing of return and either the tax payable therein is more than the amount paid or the refund claimed therein is less than the amount as claimed, under the return sought to be revised.
(4) Notwithstanding the penalties prescribed in section 33, if a registered person wishes to file revised return voluntarily along with deposit of the amount of tax short paid or amount of tax evaded along with default surcharge, whenever it comes to his notice, before receipt of notice of audit, no penalty shall be recovered from him:
Provided that in case the registered person wishes to deposit the amount of tax as pointed out by the officer of Inland Revenue during the audit, or at any time before issuance of the show cause notice, he may deposit the evaded amount of tax, default surcharge under section (34), and twenty five percent of the penalty payable under section 33 along with the levied return:
Provided further that in case the registered person wishes to deposit the amount after issuance of show cause notice, he shall deposit the evaded amount of sales tax, default surcharge under section 34, and full amount of leviable penalty under section 33 along with the revised return and thereafter, the show cause notice, shall stands abated.
(5) The Board may, by notification in the official Gazette, require any person or class of persons, for any goods of such description or class, to furnish such summary or details or particulars pertaining to the imports, purchases and supplies during any tax period or periods, in such format as may be specified.
26A. Omitted
26AB. Extension of time for furnishing returns. (1) A registered person required to furnish a return under section 26 may apply, in writing, to the Commissioner for an extension of time to furnish the return.
(2) An application under sub-section (1) shall be made by the due date for furnishing the return in terms of section 2(9) for the period to which the application relates.
(3) Where an application has been made under sub-section (1) and the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant is unable to furnish the return to which the application relates by the due date because of–
(a) absence from Pakistan;
(b) sickness or other misadventure; or
(c) any other reasonable cause,
the Commissioner may, by order in writing, grant the applicant an extension of time for furnishing the return.
(4) An extension of time under sub-section (3) shall not exceed fifteen days from the due date for furnishing the return, unless there are exceptional circumstances justifying a longer extension of time:
Provided that where the Commissioner has not granted extension for furnishing the return under sub-sections (3) or (4), the Chief Commissioner may on an application made by the registered person for
extension or further extension, as the case may be, grant extension or further extension for a period not exceeding fifteen days, unless there are exceptional circumstances justifying a longer extension of time.
(5) An extension or further extension of time granted under sub-sections (3) or (4), as the case may be, shall not, for the purpose of charge of default surcharge under section 34, change the due date for payment of sales tax under section 6.
-

FBR sacks director customs audit on NAB conviction
The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has demonstrated its commitment to maintaining integrity and accountability within its ranks by dismissing a director of the Directorate of Internal Audit – South (Customs), Karachi.
(more…) -

Ch. Tarique posted as Chief Commissioner CTO Lahore
The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) took decisive steps on Friday, announcing the transfer and posting of Ch. Muhammad Tarique, a BS-21 officer of the Inland Revenue Service (IRS), as the Chief Commissioner Inland Revenue at the Corporate Tax Office (CTO) Lahore.
(more…) -

IR officers may determine fair price in transactions
Section 25AA of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 grants Inland Revenue (IR) officers the authority to determine the fair market value of supplies in transactions between associates.
(more…) -

Applications invited for post of CEO FBR Foundation
The Federal Board of Revenue Foundation (FBRF) has officially opened applications for the position of Chief Executive Officer (CEO), with a deadline set for November 30, 2021.
(more…) -

Digital mode to disrupt business transactions: FPCCI
KARACHI: Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) has said that the digital mode of payment for corporate expenses would disrupt business transactions; because almost all sales in the country are made on credit and this credit is secured through ‘post-dated’ cheques issued by buyers in favor of the sellers.
Mian Nasser Hayat Maggo, President FPCCI, in a statement on Thursday expressed dismay that the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) continues to persist with the provisions of the ITO Third Amendment 2021; which seeks to compel companies to make payments for their expenses through digital mode instead of cross cheques; which is the prevalent mode for settling sale and purchase transactions in the country.
He also stated that he was shocked by news reports revealing serious ‘Conflict of Interest’ underpinning this provision of coercing companies to make payments digitally. It has been learnt that this proposal was initiated by a committee of the FBR; and, not by the FBR itself and that committee includes an owner of a B2B FinTech company; which provides software services for digital payments.
FPCCI Chief added that it was that owner of the FinTech Company and a member of that FBR committee as well; who proposed this idea and pushed it to be made part of the law, according to some other committee members.
Mian Nasser Hyatt Maggo added that FPCCI has taken note of FBR’s contention that “3rd party payments are highly prevalent in organized and informal sector whereby businesses do not use their own bank accounts when making payment for supplies and tell their own customers/transaction based informal investors to make direct payments to the principal supplier.
This is highly prevalent in supply chains and has become an accepted norm” FPCCI considers this as a fallacious argument, as such practice cannot be employed by a company as it has to deduct withholding tax on all payments that it makes and submit returns of tax withheld to the FBR, he added.
Mian Nasser Hyatt Maggo explained that a company can only indulge in such practice if it has an ‘Undeclared Business Account’ in a bank. In that case, any such delinquent company can continue to make payments digitally; despite the change in the law; as the bank account used is ‘undeclared’ anyway.
Mian Nasser Hyatt Maggo pointed out that, nowhere else in the world, bank cheques have been discontinued or businesses coerced to use digital mode of payment instead of bank cheques. FBR’s desire to outlaw use of bank cheques by companies is indeed a unique regulation. Digital payments are evolving in Pakistan and developed countries are way ahead in employing digital mode of payments, but they too, have not coerced companies or anyone else to limit or discontinue use of cheques, he added.
FPCCI President emphasized that it is abundantly clear that what the FBR enunciates as problems, that lead to leakage of revenue, pertain more to the non-corporate sector than the corporate sector. The question, therefore, is why companies are being subjected to this third degree? The obvious answer lies in vested interests influencing the FBR to promote a particular mode of business by one stroke of a pen, he added.